A new method for eddy current testing of crack length in aircraft load-bearing components based on resonance method
Source abstract
Abstract
Aircraft bearing beams are critical structures securing landing gear, yet prone to fracture during service. Detecting hidden defects beneath composite layers remains challenging. To address this, a novel eddy current sensor was designed and developed with high sensitivity and the ability to detect hidden cracks in the large lift-off state. A novel three-dimensional model has been proposed for detecting defects in aircraft load-bearing components under the application of composite materials. The model utilizes the calculation and matching of coil impedance of the large lift-off eddy current scattering field, and analyzes eddy current diffusion at defect endpoints under composite layers. Simulations and experiments demonstrate the coil resonant probe outperforms non-resonant counterparts, and the optimized probe can detecting defects as small as 5 mm (length) × 0.2 mm (width) × 0.5 mm (depth) . Eddy current penetration increases with sector defect radius until stabilizing beyond a threshold radius. The novelty lies in the resonance-enhanced impedance matching method, which significantly improves sensitivity for detecting sub-composite cracks under large lift-off (3 mm). .
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Nanchang Hangkong University
State-Owned Wuhu Machinery Factory
Funding
Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education Fund · Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi · Doctoral Startup Fund
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.03.01010.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.03.010 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.10571110.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105711 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.10484710.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104847 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.10790710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107907 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.08010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.080 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.10875910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108759 ↗
7. 10.3390/ma1805105610.3390/ma18051056 ↗
8. 10.3390/aerospace1203026610.3390/aerospace12030266 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.10597610.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105976 ↗
10. 10.1098/rspa.2017.019410.1098/rspa.2017.0194 ↗
11. Zanini F, Hermanek P, Rathore J, et al. Investigation on the accuracy of CT porosity analysis of additive manufactured metallic parts [C]. Int Symp Digit Ind Radiol Comput Tomogr. 2015:22–25.
12. 10.1016/j.infrared.2023.10457910.1016/j.infrared.2023.104579 ↗
13. Zhan P. Comparative study on penetration and eddy current testing for welding defects in aluminum alloy. Fourth Int Conf Test Technol Autom Eng (TTAE 2024). 2024;13439:350–355.
14. 10.1177/002029401880138210.1177/0020294018801382 ↗
15. 10.3390/s11030252510.3390/s110302525 ↗
16. Huang SL, Peng LS, Sun HY. Review of non-destructive testing and online monitoring technology for aero-engine blade defects. Meas Control Technol. 2023;42(5):1–11.
17. Lysenko I Mirchev Y Levchenko O et al. Advantages of using eddy current array for detection and evaluation of defects in aviation components. 2023.
18. 10.1134/S106183090802009510.1134/S1061830908020095 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.10.01010.1016/j.ndteint.2009.10.010 ↗
20. 10.1177/1045389X1455413710.1177/1045389X14554137 ↗
21. Zhang S, Hu S, Lu W. FEM simulation of eddy current testing for hidden corrosion in multi-layer conductive plates. Comput Simul. 2012;29(5):391–395.
22. Wang L, Zhang B, Peng Y, et al. Eddy current testing of internal defect in additive/subtractive hybrid manufacturing. Acta Aeronautica ET Astronautica Sin. 2020;41(3):292–300.
23. 10.1080/10589759.2024.233706110.1080/10589759.2024.2337061 ↗
24. 10.1109/TIM.2022.321930710.1109/TIM.2022.3219307 ↗