journal article·2026-05-04

Improved nondestructive sensor for field-friendly measurement of total flux leakage to detect corrosion damage to steel wires in concrete structures

Sangho Lee, Imjong Kwahk, Ji-Young Choi, Changbin Joh, Joo-Hyung Lee, Kwang-Yeun Park

Publisher page

Abstract

This study introduces the M8 sensor, an improved non-destructive sensor designed to detect cross-sectional losses of steel wires. The ‘M’ in M8 denotes ‘magnet’. Developed as an alternative to the previously used solenoid sensor – which required labour-intensive field winding on tendons or cables – the M8 sensor offers enhanced workability and testing reproducibility. Operating on the same principle as the solenoid sensor, the M8 sensor uses primary coils consisting of eight bar-shaped electromagnets to generate magnetic flux within the steel wires, while a secondary coil measures the total magnetic flux. Variations in the total magnetic flux along the wire length enable the identification of any cross-sectional loss. Numerical simulations were performed to investigate the magnetic flux density distributions in the M8 and solenoid sensors. The results indicated equivalent distributions in both sensors. This implies that the M8 sensor can operate on the same principle. Experimental demonstrations of the M8 and solenoid sensors indicated that the M8 sensor successfully detected a 6.7% cross-sectional loss in the tendon. This confirmed the comparable performance of the M8 and solenoid sensors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Smart Materials for Construction

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology

Funding

Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement · Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11498510.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114985 ↗
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000088810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000888 ↗
3. Nims DK Devabhaktuni V. Magnetic sensor for nondestructive evaluation of deteriorated prestressing strand - phase I final report. Toledo (OH): The University of Toledo University Transportation Center; 2011.
4. 10.1016/S0963-8695(00)00051-710.1016/S0963-8695(00)00051-7 ↗
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-156110.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561 ↗
6. ACI committee 228 report on nondestructive test methods for evaluation of concrete in structures (ACI 228.2R–13). Farmington Hills (MI): American Concrete Institute; 2013.
7. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.10976510.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109765 ↗
8. 10.1177/147592171668434010.1177/1475921716684340 ↗
9. 10.3390/ma1224411610.3390/ma12244116 ↗
10. 10.3390/ma1213215410.3390/ma12132154 ↗
11. 10.1080/10589759.2012.69578510.1080/10589759.2012.695785 ↗
12. 10.1007/s13349-013-0061-410.1007/s13349-013-0061-4 ↗
13. 10.3390/app1021739810.3390/app10217398 ↗
14. Madsen SF, Mieritz CF. Current distribution and magnetic fields in complex structures using comsol multiphysics. In: Proceedings of COMSOL users conference; Stuttgart (Germany). Burlington (MA): COMSOL; 2011 Oct 26–28.
15. Kennedy MW, Akhtar S, Bakken JA, et al. Analytical and experimental validation of electromagnetic simulations using COMSOL®, re inductance, induction heating and magnetic fields. In: Proceedings of COMSOL users conference; Stuttgart (Germany). Burlington (MA): COMSOL; 2011 Oct 26–28.
16. 10.1109/EMC/SI/PI/EMCEurope52599.2021.955935710.1109/EMC/SI/PI/EMCEurope52599.2021.9559357 ↗
17. Theryo TS, Hartt WH, Paczkowsk P. Guidelines for sampling, assessing, and restoring defective grout in prestressed concrete bridge post-tensioning ducts. McLean (VA): Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, Federal Highway Administration; 2013. p. FHWA-HRT-13–028.
18. Hamming RW. Digital filters. Mineola (NY): Dover Publication Inc; 1997.
19. 10.1109/78.49255210.1109/78.492552 ↗