Efficient identification of 2D/3D particle morphology parameters based on a dual-stage neural network approach
Source abstract
Abstract
The macroscopic mechanical behaviour of geotechnical materials in underground space resources is significantly influenced by particle morphology parameters. Traditional two-dimensional (2D) image analysis methods are unable to accurately reflect the three-dimensional (3D) geometric characteristics of particles and suffer from issues such as low efficiency and insufficient automation. To address these problems, this paper proposes a rapid identification method for 2D/3D size parameters of particles based on a dual-stage neural network model. Firstly, particle models are generated and rendered using computer graphics software to construct a large-scale annotated dataset. Subsequently, a two-stage neural network model is designed: the first stage extracts 2D size parameters of particles through image segmentation and identification, while the second stage constructs a 3D parameter recognition network based on multi-view images to achieve precise measurement of the three-dimensional geometric features of particles. The experimental results demonstrate that this method exhibits high recognition accuracy and efficiency. Specifically, the dual-stage network model (e.g. Mobile-UNet + MobileViT) excels in 2D parameter recognition, with MAE reaching 1.67 pixels, MSE reaching 5.38 pixels, and R2 reaching 98.51%. In 3D parameter recognition, the model with bidirectional input significantly improves recognition accuracy. Additionally, the lightweight network design maintains high accuracy while reducing the number of parameters, showing potential for deployment on edge computing devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction · Granular flow and fluidized beds · Mineral Processing and Grinding
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Army Engineering University of PLA
Southwest Jiaotong University
Sichuan Sanhe College of Professionals
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.10357210.1016/j.rineng.2024.103572 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.11.01710.1016/j.cemconres.2004.11.017 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.05.02410.1016/j.advwatres.2019.05.024 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevE.100.01290410.1103/PhysRevE.100.012904 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.apt.2017.04.01610.1016/j.apt.2017.04.016 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.12.09410.1016/j.powtec.2016.12.094 ↗
7. 10.1038/s42254-023-00617-910.1038/s42254-023-00617-9 ↗
8. 10.1680/jgeot.21.0018010.1680/jgeot.21.00180 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.11.01510.1016/j.jrmge.2022.11.015 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.10629810.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106298 ↗
11. E Gallagher. Optoelectronic coarse particle size analysers for industrial measurement and control. University of Queensland; 1976.
12. Carlsson O, Nyberg L. A method for estimation of fragment size distribution with automatic image processing International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting. 1983;1983:333–345.
13. Nyberg L, Carlsson O, Schmidtbauer B. Estimation of the size distribution of fragmented rock in ore mining through automatic image processing. International Measurement Conference. 1983:293–302.
14. 10.1049/ip-vis:2005081010.1049/ip-vis:20050810 ↗
15. 10.3182/20091014-3-CL-4011.0002510.3182/20091014-3-CL-4011.00025 ↗
16. 10.3390/jimaging803007210.3390/jimaging8030072 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2023.01.00610.1016/j.geotexmem.2023.01.006 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.10662410.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106624 ↗
19. 10.1002/rvr2.11410.1002/rvr2.114 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.10717010.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107170 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.powtec.2015.12.02910.1016/j.powtec.2015.12.029 ↗
22. 10.1007/s11440-019-00845-310.1007/s11440-019-00845-3 ↗
23. 10.3390/ma1315328610.3390/ma13153286 ↗
24. 10.1111/mice.1342110.1111/mice.13421 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.10569910.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105699 ↗
26. 10.1007/s11440-022-01616-310.1007/s11440-022-01616-3 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.autcon.2024.10532810.1016/j.autcon.2024.105328 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jag.2024.10435210.1016/j.jag.2024.104352 ↗
29. 10.1007/s42452-022-05031-x10.1007/s42452-022-05031-x ↗
30. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.10123510.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101235 ↗
31. 10.1088/1361-6501/abae9010.1088/1361-6501/abae90 ↗
32. 10.1039/b816680c10.1039/b816680c ↗
33. 10.1080/10589759.2024.243114610.1080/10589759.2024.2431146 ↗
34. 10.1080/10589759.2023.217037410.1080/10589759.2023.2170374 ↗
35. 10.1080/10589759.2023.223454810.1080/10589759.2023.2234548 ↗
36. Blender free and open source 3D creation suite. 2024. Available from: https://www.blender.org/
37. Xu W-J. MEGGS-Particles: an open source database of the 3D geometric model of geotechnical particles. 2020.
38. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.10591510.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105915 ↗
39. Image Pro Plus. 2024. Available from: https://mediacy.com/image-pro/
40. 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.02.02210.1016/j.powtec.2020.02.022 ↗
41. Simonyan K, Zisserman A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2015.
42. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Jian, S. Deep residual learning for image recognition Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2015:770–778.
43. Huang G, Liu Z, Maaten L, Weinberger, Kilian Q. Densely connected convolutional networks Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2018:4700–4708.
44. Howard AG Zhu M Chen B et al. MobileNets: efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. 2017.
45. 10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_2810.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 ↗
46. Dosovitskiy A Beyer L Kolesnikov A et al. An image is worth 16x16 words: transformers for image recognition at scale. 2021.
47. 10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.0098610.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00986 ↗
48. Mehta S Rastegari M. MobileViT: light-weight general-purpose and mobile-Friendly vision transformer. 2022.
49. Kingma DP Ba J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. 2017.