Stress and defect detection of x80 pipes based on acoustic characteristics analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Non-destructive testing based on vibration characteristics is one of the effective methods for evaluating structural integrity. In this study, a non-destructive testing method based on acoustic vibration characteristics, finite element, and experimental methods is proposed for X80 pipe. The influence of pipe stress (the elastic region), defect, and percussion on the acoustic vibration characteristics of pipe is explored. The simulation and experimental results show that the stress state of the pipe increases the dominant vibration frequency and shows a good linear relationship. The increase of pipe defects decreases the main frequency of vibration, showing a negative linear correlation; the percussion position, the signal receiving position, and the percussion intensity do not significantly percussion the results, indicating that the method is robust. In summary, the vibration of the pipe under percussion can be used as the basis for evaluating the structural state of the pipe. This study guides the design of pipe detection methods based on vibration characteristics.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
China University of Petroleum-Beijing
Funding
Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by Beijing Association for Science and Technology · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Science and Technology Research Project of Pipechina · Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2024.10529010.1016/j.ijpvp.2024.105290 ↗
2. Yaorong F, Lincang J, Li Weiwei Lu , Chunyu H. Advances and prospects of X80 pipeline steel and steel pipe development and application in China. Oil & Gas Storage and Transp. 2020;39(6):612–622.
3. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.10487010.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104870 ↗
4. Weng G, Ding J, Cao J, et al. Experiment and numerical simulation of stress detection for oil and gas pipelines based on magnetic stress coupling of pipeline steel[c]//structures. Vol. 55. Elsevier; 2023. p. 2478–2490.
5. 10.1016/j.finel.2024.10423910.1016/j.finel.2024.104239 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.10798910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107989 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.10301910.1016/j.ndteint.2023.103019 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.10288110.1016/j.ndteint.2023.102881 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2023.11958010.1016/j.actamat.2023.119580 ↗
10. Yukun L, Jinchuan Y, Shoutian J, et al. Study on the measurement method of welding residual stress of X80 pipeline based on coercivity. Press Vessel. 2022;39(9):9–18.
11. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2024.10310010.1016/j.ndteint.2024.103100 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.aei.2024.10249210.1016/j.aei.2024.102492 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2023.10512310.1016/j.ijpvp.2023.105123 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.17086710.1016/j.jmmm.2023.170867 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2024.17181610.1016/j.jmmm.2024.171816 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13655010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136550 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.11085410.1016/j.measurement.2022.110854 ↗
18. Runkun L, Wang B, Wang H, et al. Internal inspection system of self-driven wall thickness continuous scanning for industrial pipeline based on electromagnetic ultrasonic. Instr Technol Sens. 2024;7:94–99+104.
19. H AC W BL. Residual stress identification in thin plates based on modal data and sensitivity analysis. 2021.
20. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.10532110.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.105321 ↗
21. 10.1007/s40997-022-00588-910.1007/s40997-022-00588-9 ↗
22. 10.3389/fmats.2022.87611110.3389/fmats.2022.876111 ↗
23. Kumar SG, Kumar SB, Praveenkumar K, et al. Bending analysis and residual stress measurement of thin stainless-steel alloy. In: Proceedings; 2022.
24. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.11788210.1016/j.engstruct.2024.117882 ↗
25. Tianqi W. Study on local vibration of steel bridge deck considering geometric defects and residual stress. South China University of Technology; 2020.
26. 10.3389/fmats.2022.87611110.3389/fmats.2022.876111 ↗
27. Daihui LIAO, Aiguo CHENG, Huichao XIE. Modal analysis and optimization of car body structure considering stamping residual stress and thickness variation. Vibr And Shock. 2010;29(3):4.
28. Gao T. Research on the calculation method of natural frequency of rectangular thin plate with welding residual stress. Vibr And Impact. 2014;33(9):3.
29. Shiming G. Residual stress test of VPPA-MIG hybrid welding of high strength aluminum alloy[d]. Inner Mongolia University of Technology; 2020.
30. Feng B, Gang Y, Yue G. Pipeline damage identification method based on vibration modal test. Mech Des And Res. 2021.
31. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2023.10923910.1016/j.apacoust.2023.109239 ↗
32. 10.32604/sdhm.2024.05019510.32604/sdhm.2024.050195 ↗
33. LIAO Chunhui. Study on nondestructive screening method for internal defects of ancient building wood components. Beijing Forestry University; 2015.
34. Zhigao L, Yanjun L, Yuyuan C, et al. Research on knock detection defect recognition based on EM clustering. Aviat Comput Technol. 2022;52(2):53–57.
35. Liang S. Simulation analysis of blade delamination detection based on knocking method[d]. Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2015.
36. Haiqing L. Nondestructive monitoring method of high-speed rail based on vibration signal[d]. Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2013.
37. Research on structural defect detection method based on vibration signal[d]. Harbin Engineering University; 2018.
38. Ma S. Numerical simulation and experimental study of ultrasonic lamb wave propagation in welded joints[D]. Harbin Institute of Technology; 2018.
39. Ma X. Pattern recognition of material defect ultrasonic testing based on comsol simulation[D]. Nanchang Hangkong University; 2019.