journal article·2012-09Open access

Piezoelectric radiofrequency transducers as passive buried sensors

T. Rétornaz, J.-M. Friedt, S. Alzuaga, T. Baron, É. Lebrasseur, G. Martin, T. Laroche, S. Ballandras, M. Griselin, J.-P. Simonnet

Abstract

We demonstrate that single-piezoelectric substrate-based acoustic transducers act as ideal sensors for probing with various RADAR strategies. Because these sensors are intrinsically passive devices working in the radiofrequency range, they exhibit improved interrogation range and robustness with respect to silicon-based radio frequency identification tags. Both wideband (acoustic delay lines) and narrowband (acoustic resonators) transducers are shown to be compatible with pulse-mode and frequency-modulated continuous-wave RADAR strategies, respectively. We particularly focus on the ground-penetrating RADAR (GPR) application in which the lack of local energy source makes these sensors suitable candidates for buried applications in roads, building or civil engineering monitoring. A novel acoustic sensor concept – high-overtone bulk acoustic resonator – is especially suited as sensor interrogated by a wide range of antenna set, as demonstrated with GPR units working in the 100 and 200 MHz range.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Seismic Waves and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Clemena G. · 2003
2. 10.1016/S0926-9851(99)00052-X10.1016/S0926-9851(99)00052-X ↗
3. Morey Rexford M. · 1998
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1996)2:2(94)10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1996)2:2(94) ↗
5. Brooker G. · 2007
6. Lipták B. · 2003 · 1
7. 10.1109/36.71864910.1109/36.718649 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.350465010.1063/1.3504650 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.175427610.1063/1.1754276 ↗
10. Bao X.Q. · 1987 · 583
11. 10.1109/58.72646610.1109/58.726466 ↗
12. Scholl G. · 1998 · 595
13. 10.1109/41.91540410.1109/41.915404 ↗
14. 10.1109/TUFFC.2004.136748610.1109/TUFFC.2004.1367486 ↗
15. 10.1109/TUFFC.2006.164251610.1109/TUFFC.2006.1642516 ↗
16. 10.1109/19.81611110.1109/19.816111 ↗
17. Beckley J. · 2002 · 202
18. Scherr H. · 1996 · 347
19. Bruckner G. · 2003 · 467
20. Oh H. · Int. J. Smart Sens. Intell. Syst. · 2008 · 1 · 940
21. 10.1016/S0925-4005(01)00603-710.1016/S0925-4005(01)00603-7 ↗
22. Seidel W. · 2003 · 1408
23. 10.5194/ars-1-131-200310.5194/ars-1-131-2003 ↗
24. Pohl A. · 1994 · 19510.1109/ULTSYM.1994.401578 ↗
25. Reindl L. · 1997 · 161
26. Hartmann C. · 2002 · 6510.1109/ULTSYM.2002.1193354 ↗
27. Han J. · 2007 · 8 · 16110.1007/978-0-387-73046-2_22 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2007.04.00810.1016/j.coldregions.2007.04.008 ↗
29. 10.1109/TUFFC.2010.146210.1109/TUFFC.2010.1462 ↗
30. 10.1109/TUFFC.2008.84010.1109/TUFFC.2008.840 ↗
31. Kim S. · 2006
32. 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1989.tb02221.x10.1111/j.1365-2478.1989.tb02221.x ↗
33. 10.1109/TIT.1974.105528210.1109/TIT.1974.1055282 ↗
34. 10.1109/MWSYM.2007.38055510.1109/MWSYM.2007.380555 ↗
35. Scheiblhofer S. · 2008 · 121
36. 10.1063/1.326731110.1063/1.3267311 ↗
37. 10.1080/0015019080199787210.1080/00150190801997872 ↗