journal article·2025-10-03

Assessment of non-destructive nuclear and non-nuclear asphalt density testing devices for Australian road construction

Noriko Wood, Azizur Rahman, Ryan H.L. Ip, Jackie Graham

Publisher page

Abstract

Non-nuclear density gauges, also known as Pavement Quality Indicators (PQIs), offer several advantages over widely used destructive test methods and nuclear density gauges (NDGs) for asphalt density measurement. Replacing NDGs with PQIs would simplify regulatory requirements and reduce the cost and complexity of in-situ asphalt density measurement. This is due to the absence of nuclear materials and the ability of PQIs to provide measurements rapidly. However, PQIs have not gained widespread use in Australia due to concerns regarding accuracy. This work assesses the suitability of PQIs for both acceptance and quality control testing by analysing a dataset collected over an extended period and across a wide range of construction sites in Australia. Accuracy was evaluated based on the strength of the relationship between gauge measurements and core density results. Although some evidence supporting the use of PQIs for quality control purposes has been found, their use for acceptance testing remains unwarranted. Recommendations for establishing standard testing methods are provided to encourage wider adoption of PQIs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geophysical Methods and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Charles Sturt University

Fulton Hogan

Auckland University of Technology

Statistical Edge Pty Ltd

Funding

Charles Sturt University

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/036119819615430010510.1177/0361198196154300105 ↗
2. Asphalt Institute. Asphalt pavement construction. n.d. Available from: https://www.asphaltinstitute.org/engineering/frequently-asked-questions/asphalt-pavement-construction/
3. 10.3141/1632-0310.3141/1632-03 ↗
4. 10.1080/10589759.2018.148492110.1080/10589759.2018.1484921 ↗
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.000011310.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000113 ↗
6. VicRoads. Acceptance of field compaction code of practice RC 500.05. Melbourne: Department of Transport; 2017. Available from: https://www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/-/media/files/technical-documents-new/codes-of-practice-rc500/code-of-practice-rc-50005–acceptance-of-field-compaction.ashx
7. Department of Transport and Main Roads. Technical specification transport and main roads specifications MRTS30 asphalt pavements. Queensland Government. 2022. Available from: https://www.tmr.qld.gov.au/-/media/busind/techstdpubs/Specifications-and-drawings/Specifications/5-Pavements-Subgrade-and-Surfacing/MRTS30.pdf?la=en
8. Department of Planning Transport and Infrastructure. Specification: part R28 construction of asphalt pavements. 2018. Available from: https://www.dit.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/488381/Part_R28_Construction_of_Asphalt_Pavements_Effective_July_2018.pdf
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000054510.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000545 ↗
10. 10.1520/JTE10146010.1520/JTE101460 ↗
11. 10.1007/s42452-019-0958-610.1007/s42452-019-0958-6 ↗
12. Australian Asphalt Pavement Association. Nuclear density testing of asphalt pavements – pavement work tips No. 42. 2004. Available from: https://www.afpa.asn.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Worktips-42-Nuclear-density-testing-of-asphalt-pavements.pdf
13. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.10229210.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102292 ↗
14. 10.1080/10589759.2020.183455510.1080/10589759.2020.1834555 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.10360410.1016/j.autcon.2021.103604 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13578910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135789 ↗
17. Tarr K Grobler J. Annual summary report. P59 - best practice in non-destructive testing of assurance of asphalt – year 3 (2019-20). Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads; 2021. Available from: https://www.nacoe.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/P59-PQI-Report-Y3-FINAL.pdf
18. Alderson A. The influence of compaction on the performance of dense-graded asphalt. Report AP-T194-11. Austroads; 2011. Available from: https://austroads.com.au/publications/pavement/ap-t194-11/media/AP-T194-11_The_Influence_of_Compaction_on_the_Performance_of_Dense_Graded_Asphalt.pdf
19. ASTM International. ASTM D2726/D2726M-17. standard test method for bulk specific gravity and density of non-absorptive compacted asphalt mixtures. 2017. Available from: https://www.astm.org/d2726_d2726m-17.html
20. ASTM International. ASTM D6752/6752M-18. standard test method for bulk specific gravity and density of compacted asphalt mixtures using automatic vacuum sealing method. 2018. Available from: https://www.astm.org/d6752_d6752m-18.html
21. 10.1109/M2VIP49856.2021.966499110.1109/M2VIP49856.2021.9664991 ↗
22. 10.1080/1058975070184869710.1080/10589750701848697 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.10426210.1016/j.autcon.2022.104262 ↗
24. Department of Transport and Main Roads. Nuclear gauge testing manual. Queensland Government; 2023 (ed. 4, amendment 1). Available from: https://www.tmr.qld.gov.au/business-industry/Technical-standards-publications/Nuclear-gauge-testing-manual
25. Troxler Electronic Laboratories, Inc. Manual of operation and instruction model 4640-B thin layer density gauge. Research Triangle Park (NC): Troxler Electronic Laboratories Inc.; 2009.
26. 10.1061/9780784482810.06210.1061/9780784482810.062 ↗
27. Wen H Rose M Timm A. Review of non-nuclear density gauges as possible replacement for ITD’s nuclear density gauges. Report RP 210. Idaho Transportation Department; 2015. Available from: https://apps.itd.idaho.gov/apps/research/Completed/RP210.pdf
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13203110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132031 ↗
29. 10.1080/10589759.2023.225536310.1080/10589759.2023.2255363 ↗
30. 10.1080/10589759.2015.111189010.1080/10589759.2015.1111890 ↗
31. 10.1080/10589759.2012.69578410.1080/10589759.2012.695784 ↗
32. Trans Tech Systems. TransTech systems’ pavement quality IndicatorTM Technical application Brief. 2016. Available from: http://transtechsys.com/pdf/techBrief380.pdf
33. TransTech Systems. Pavement quality indicator PQI-380 Operator’s handbook (Vers. 1.6). 2021. Available from: http://www.transtechsys.com/pdf/PQI380Manual.pdf
34. 10.1201/978100325112510.1201/9781003251125 ↗
35. 10.28991/cej-2020-0309153810.28991/cej-2020-03091538 ↗
36. Romero P. Evaluation of non-nuclear gauges to measure density of hot-mix asphalt pavements. Salt Lake City (UT) USA: The University of Utah; 2002. Available from: https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/DOT/documents/dresearch/SPRMarylandFINALREPORTV4pdf.pdf
37. 10.3141/2081-1310.3141/2081-13 ↗
38. 10.28991/cej-2019-0309137410.28991/cej-2019-03091374 ↗
39. 10.3923/jas.2010.3091.309710.3923/jas.2010.3091.3097 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.18610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.186 ↗
41. ASTM International. ASTM D7113/D7113M-10. standard test method for density of bituminous paving mixtures in place by the electromagnetic surface contact methods. 2010. Available from: https://www.astm.org/d7113_d7113m-10.html
42. Austroads. Guide to pavement technology part 3: pavement surfacings. Austroads Ltd. Sydney; 2009. Available from: https://austroads.com.au/publications/pavement/agpt03/media/AGPT03-09_Guide_to_Pavement_Technology_Part_3_Pavement_Surfacings_Ed1.2.pdf
43. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.718-720.191410.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.718-720.1914 ↗
44. 10.1080/10298436.2023.219877010.1080/10298436.2023.2198770 ↗
45. Kvasnak A Williams R Ceylan H et al. Investigation of electromagnetic gauges for determining In-place HMA density. Final report. Report No. IHRB Project TR-547. Iowa State University; 2007. Available from: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/23882
46. Sargand S Kim S Farrington S. A working review of available non-nuclear equipment for determining In-place density of asphalt. Report No. FHWA/OH-2005/18. The Ohio Department of Transportation; 2005. Available from: https://trid.trb.org/view/781627
47. Tarr K. Final report. P59 – best practice non-destructive testing in assurance of asphalt: evaluation of the pavement quality indicator (2021-22). Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads; 2023. Available from: https://www.nacoe.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/P59_21_22_Rep_Best-practise-non-descructive-testing-in-assurance-of-aspahlt_Y4_For-Publication.pdf
48. Williams S. Non-nuclear methods for HMA density measurements. Final report. Report No. MBTC 2075. University of Arkansas; 2008. Available from: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/17014
49. Darra S. Development of an improved system for Oregon to accurately quantify dense-graded hot mix asphalt pavement density [masters thesis]. Oregon State University; 2009. Available from: https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_dissertations/1z40kz10b
50. Padlo P Mahoney J Aultman-Hall L et al. Correlation of nuclear density readings with cores cut from compacted roadways. Final report. Report No. CT-2242-F-05-5. 2005. Available from: https://trid.trb.org/View/788441s