Determination of Poisson’s ratio of coal gangue-based shotcrete materials using a non-contact test method
Source abstract
Abstract
Preparing shotcrete materials using coal gangue is an effective method of disposal and use of gangue solid waste, while testing the Poisson’s ratio of coal gangue-based shotcrete materials (CGSM) is an important step in evaluating the mechanical properties of such materials. Therefore, to study the evolution of the Poisson’s ratio of CGSM under different influencing factors, detailed test schemes and procedures were designed based on the non-contact test method of Poisson’s ratio. The accuracy of the non-contact test method is verified. In addition, changes in the Poisson’s ratio of CGSM under different factors were studied. Results show that the Poisson’s ratio of CGSM tends to reduce with prolonged curing. When the particle sizes of coal gangue are 0 ~ 2.5 and 2.5 ~ 5 mm, fine particles can fill interstitial voids in shotcrete materials. As the mass concentration and cement content increase, the Poisson’s ratio of CGSM gradually decreases; as the sand content rises, the Poisson’s ratio gradually increases.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Concrete and Cement Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory for Fine Exploration and Intelligent Development of Coal Resources, School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.12521610.1016/j.fuel.2022.125216 ↗
2. 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9500.2014.06.00910.3969/j.issn.1008-9500.2014.06.009 ↗
3. 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3363.2007.02.00210.3969/j.issn.1673-3363.2007.02.002 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.energy.2020.11879010.1016/j.energy.2020.118790 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.12.00110.1016/j.resconrec.2013.12.001 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.05.01910.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.05.019 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.05210.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.052 ↗
8. 10.13545/j.cnki.jmse.2020.01.01510.13545/j.cnki.jmse.2020.01.015 ↗
9. 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2018.051810.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2018.0518 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.eml.2020.10074810.1016/j.eml.2020.100748 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.08.01310.1016/j.compgeo.2015.08.013 ↗
12. 10.7520/1001-4888-16-20510.7520/1001-4888-16-205 ↗
13. 10.1088/2631-8695/ACEA5610.1088/2631-8695/ACEA56 ↗
14. Young WC, Budynas RG, Sadegh AM. Roark’s formulas for stress and strain[M]. McGraw-Hill Education; 2012.
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13245610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132456 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.13003210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.130032 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0075110.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00751 ↗
18. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.295-297.35910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.295-297.359 ↗
19. 10.1155/2020/885387010.1155/2020/8853870 ↗
20. 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2022.03.00610.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2022.03.006 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.03810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.038 ↗
22. 10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.12.01410.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.12.014 ↗
23. 10.1007/S11356-021-15638-Z10.1007/S11356-021-15638-Z ↗
24. 10.1007/s00603-018-1555-510.1007/s00603-018-1555-5 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.03.05010.1016/j.measurement.2016.03.050 ↗
26. 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2022.132710.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2022.1327 ↗
27. 10.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2022.11136710.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2022.111367 ↗
28. 10.1080/71382045410.1080/713820454 ↗
29. 10.1117/12.797292510.1117/12.7972925 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10787110.1016/j.measurement.2020.107871 ↗
31. 10.1080/10589759.2023.229977710.1080/10589759.2023.2299777 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.28610.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.286 ↗
33. 10.3321/j.issn:1005-023X.2006.03.00510.3321/j.issn:1005-023X.2006.03.005 ↗