Evaluation of ground conductor corrosion based on EMI technique with asymmetric sensor layout
Source abstract
Abstract
The ground conductor is prone to corrosion, which affects its ability to diverge current and the normal operation of the power system. The traditional detection method can’t detect its corrosion degree intuitively. This paper proposes a novel method based on Electromechanical impedance (EMI) technique to evaluate the corrosion degree of the grounding conductor. Firstly, based on the analysis of corrosion of metals. The change of ground conductor radius Δr is used as the corrosion parameter. A linear model of peak frequency Δfm and corrosion parameter Δr in asymmetric layout is established by analysing EMI and conductor mechanical admittance. Secondly, the EMI coupling models with different sensor layouts were built on the finite element software. It is verified that the asymmetric sensor layout effectively improves the sensitivity to corrosion. The linear model greatly improves the assessment accuracy compared with the Mean Absolute Percentage Deviation (MAPD) and Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) damage index. Thirdly, the proposed method is verified in a real grounding conductor corrosion experiment. The method based on the EMI technique with asymmetric sensor layout can evaluate the corrosion of the grounding conductor well.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province · Fuzhou University research start-up project
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.epsr.2021.10717410.1016/j.epsr.2021.107174 ↗
2. 10.3390/mi1205051310.3390/mi12050513 ↗
3. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.672-674.78310.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.672-674.783 ↗
4. Li LW, Zhou JY. A new type of on-line ground resistance measuring instrument with two pliers. Autom Electr Power Syst. 2003;27(14):83–86+95.
5. 10.1109/TPWRD.1986.430803610.1109/TPWRD.1986.4308036 ↗
6. 10.1109/TPWRD.1986.430803710.1109/TPWRD.1986.4308037 ↗
7. 10.1108/ACMM-08-2020-235610.1108/ACMM-08-2020-2356 ↗
8. 10.1515/corrrev-2019-011210.1515/corrrev-2019-0112 ↗
9. Hai-Tao H, Peng MF, Liu CL, et al. A new intelligent system for monitoring grounding grids. J Electr Power Sci And Tech. 2008;23(3):4.
10. 10.1080/10589759.2022.213716310.1080/10589759.2022.2137163 ↗
11. 10.1080/10589759.2021.190084610.1080/10589759.2021.1900846 ↗
12. 10.1080/10589759.2022.212296710.1080/10589759.2022.2122967 ↗
13. 10.1177/1045389X970080040610.1177/1045389X9700800406 ↗
14. 10.1088/1361-665X/ace86810.1088/1361-665X/ace868 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12531610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125316 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.10986510.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109865 ↗
17. 10.1002/stc.304910.1002/stc.3049 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.11020210.1016/j.measurement.2021.110202 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11417210.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114172 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.10963410.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109634 ↗
21. 10.1109/JSEN.2022.315764610.1109/JSEN.2022.3157646 ↗
22. 10.1177/1045389X1986177610.1177/1045389X19861776 ↗
23. 10.1088/1361-665X/ac9baa10.1088/1361-665X/ac9baa ↗
24. 10.1088/1361-665X/accc1910.1088/1361-665X/accc19 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.11092510.1016/j.measurement.2022.110925 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.10700110.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107001 ↗
27. 10.1007/s00170-019-04733-810.1007/s00170-019-04733-8 ↗
28. 10.1108/SR-03-2021-010910.1108/SR-03-2021-0109 ↗
29. 10.1115/1.142105610.1115/1.1421056 ↗
30. 10.1177/1045389X21101495110.1177/1045389X211014951 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11417610.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114176 ↗
32. Giurgiutiu V. Structural health monitoring with piezoelectric wafer active sensors. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;531.
33. 10.1016/j.corsci.2021.10989310.1016/j.corsci.2021.109893 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10880610.1016/j.measurement.2020.108806 ↗