journal article·2017-07-03

Measurement uncertainty analysis for compressive loading-based ultrasonic wave propagation

Bulent Tutmez

Publisher page

Abstract

As a non-destructive test, the ultrasonic pulse velocity measure is one of the convenient tools suggested to estimate elasticity and strength properties of rocks. Since the experimental procedure and identification process cover various uncertainty sources, an extensive measurement uncertainty analysis is required to determine the variations in the testing procedure and measurement. As a generally accepted document for the measurement uncertainty, the ‘Guide to expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM)’ recommends Taylor and Monte Carlo methods to evaluate the measurement uncertainties. In this study, both random and systematic uncertainties encountered in ultrasonic wave propagation are analysed and appraised. Starting from the conventional methods recommended in GUM and further approaches proposed previously, a copula-based evaluation procedure is proposed in order to improve the consideration of dependencies in the measurement data.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Flow Measurement and Analysis · Engineering Applied Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Engineering, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ultras.2008.03.00810.1016/j.ultras.2008.03.008 ↗
2. 10.1201/978020396445310.1201/9780203964453 ↗
3. 10.1046/j.1365-2478.1997.00337.x10.1046/j.1365-2478.1997.00337.x ↗
4. 10.1007/s00603-013-0399-210.1007/s00603-013-0399-2 ↗
5. Dunn PF · 201010.1201/b14890 ↗
6. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology · 2008
7. NASA Measurement Quality Assurance Handbook – Annex 3 · Measurement uncertainty analysis principles and methods · 2010
8. 10.1017/CBO978113913508510.1017/CBO9781139135085 ↗
9. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology · 2008
10. 10.1088/0026-1394/45/2/N0110.1088/0026-1394/45/2/N01 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.11.05910.1016/j.talanta.2010.11.059 ↗
12. 10.1088/0026-1394/47/3/01710.1088/0026-1394/47/3/017 ↗
13. Chary KB · Proceedings of the National Seminar on Non-destructive Evaluation · 2006
14. Karakus M · 35th APCOM Symposium · 2011
15. 10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00242.x10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00242.x ↗
16. 10.1007/s00769-009-0518-710.1007/s00769-009-0518-7 ↗
17. 10.1017/CBO978051175553810.1017/CBO9780511755538 ↗
18. Desenfant M · 13th International Metrology Congress 2007 · 2009
19. 10.1088/0026-1394/51/4/S22810.1088/0026-1394/51/4/S228 ↗
20. 10.1088/0026-1394/43/6/N0210.1088/0026-1394/43/6/N02 ↗
21. 10.1007/978-1-4757-3076-010.1007/978-1-4757-3076-0 ↗
22. 10.1002/asmb.v29.110.1002/asmb.v29.1 ↗
23. 10.1016/B978-044450896-6.50010-810.1016/B978-044450896-6.50010-8 ↗
24. 10.1002/047086307210.1002/0470863072 ↗
25. 10.1287/mnsc.45.2.20810.1287/mnsc.45.2.208 ↗
26. Karakus M · Proceedings of the 21th International Mining Congress and Exhibition of Turkey (IMCET2009) · 2009
27. 10.1186/s40467-014-0025-110.1186/s40467-014-0025-1 ↗
28. 10.1088/0026-1394/51/4/S17610.1088/0026-1394/51/4/S176 ↗
29. 10.1088/0026-1394/50/6/65410.1088/0026-1394/50/6/654 ↗