journal article·2026-01-02

Vibration-based structural damage detection using FRF and modal constant curvature

Nedjmeddine Meziane, Mustapha Dahak, Noureddine Touat

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper presents a new method for locating and quantifying damage in beam-like structures based on the modal constant curvatures and natural frequency extracted from the measurements of the Frequency Response Function (FRF). The modal constant curvature is very effective for localising the damage due to the discontinuity created near the damaged zone. However, in classical vibrational measurement techniques, the discontinuity is confounded by measurement noise. To overcome these limitations, a new index is developed by normalising the curvature of the first fourth vibration mode. The new index gives a value of 1 in the damage location with the elimination of all the values that can distort the results. In order to make the index sensitive for damage depth, quantification charts are developed based on natural frequency ratios. Numerical simulations on a cantilever beam demonstrated the high sensitivity of the proposed method, with errors of under 0.4%. Experimental tests on a cantilever beam confirmed its reliability, with errors of under 3.6%. The method’s low sensitivity to disturbance makes it a robust method for locating and quantifying damage in mechanical structures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/10589759.2023.228707110.1080/10589759.2023.2287071 ↗
2. 10.1080/10589759.2024.232437310.1080/10589759.2024.2324373 ↗
3. 10.1080/10589759.2024.230427710.1080/10589759.2024.2304277 ↗
4. 10.1080/10589759.2022.211447510.1080/10589759.2022.2114475 ↗
5. Sinou JJ. A review of damage detection and health monitoring of mechanical systems from changes in the measurement of linear and non-linear vibrations. Mechanical Vibrations: Measurement, Effects and Control. 2009:643–702.
6. 10.1098/rsta.2000.071710.1098/rsta.2000.0717 ↗
7. 10.1177/05831024980300020110.1177/058310249803000201 ↗
8. 10.1177/147592171036541910.1177/1475921710365419 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jsv.2007.09.00910.1016/j.jsv.2007.09.009 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.06.02710.1016/j.ymssp.2019.06.027 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.sigpro.2013.04.02710.1016/j.sigpro.2013.04.027 ↗
12. 10.1590/1679-7825179510.1590/1679-78251795 ↗
13. 10.3390/s2115521510.3390/s21155215 ↗
14. 10.1155/2014/60712510.1155/2014/607125 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jsv.2017.05.00710.1016/j.jsv.2017.05.007 ↗
16. 10.1080/10589759.2023.227401710.1080/10589759.2023.2274017 ↗
17. 10.1080/10589759.2018.151844510.1080/10589759.2018.1518445 ↗
18. 10.1006/jsvi.1997.096110.1006/jsvi.1997.0961 ↗
19. 10.1080/0305215X.2020.174629410.1080/0305215X.2020.1746294 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.apm.2020.09.01210.1016/j.apm.2020.09.012 ↗
21. 10.1080/17415977.2021.190084010.1080/17415977.2021.1900840 ↗
22. 10.1016/0022-460X(91)90595-B10.1016/0022-460X(91)90595-B ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.10745710.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107457 ↗
24. 10.22055/JACM.2020.35156.258010.22055/JACM.2020.35156.2580 ↗
25. 10.1080/10589759.2022.207793810.1080/10589759.2022.2077938 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.04.01510.1016/j.jsv.2006.04.015 ↗
27. 10.1080/10589759.2023.218196010.1080/10589759.2023.2181960 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.02010.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.020 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.apm.2018.11.02510.1016/j.apm.2018.11.025 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.06.00110.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.06.001 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.07010.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.070 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.01.00410.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.01.004 ↗
33. 10.1088/0266-5611/21/2/R0110.1088/0266-5611/21/2/R01 ↗
34. Bui HD. Fracture mechanics. inverse problems and solutions. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media; 2007.
35. 10.1016/j.crme.2018.09.00310.1016/j.crme.2018.09.003 ↗
36. 10.1080/10589759.2016.122630210.1080/10589759.2016.1226302 ↗
37. Salehi M, Zisei-Rad S, Ghayour M, et al. A structural damage detection technique based on measured frequency response functions. Contemp Eng Sci. 2010;3:215–226.
38. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.10718510.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107185 ↗
39. 10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00190-110.1016/S0022-460X(03)00190-1 ↗
40. 10.1002/stc.36910.1002/stc.369 ↗
41. 10.1177/168781402098732910.1177/1687814020987329 ↗
42. Reddy DM, Swarnamani S. Application of the FRF curvature energy damage detection method to plate like structures. World J Modell Simul. 2012;8:147–153.
43. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.12310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.123 ↗
44. Kim JB, Lee ET, Eun HC. Damage detection by the curvature of POMs extracted from measured FRF data. J Vibroeng. 2014;16:434–446.
45. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.06.00810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.06.008 ↗
46. Tada H, Paris P, Irwin G. The stress analysis of cracks handbook. Hellertown (PA): Del Research Corp; 1973.
47. 10.1177/1077546321102676310.1177/10775463211026763 ↗
48. EWINS DJ. Modal testing theory, practice and application. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
49. 10.1080/17415977.2018.144283410.1080/17415977.2018.1442834 ↗