LNG storage tanks 9% Ni steel weld inspection via phased-coherent TFM and SVD enhancement
Source abstract
Abstract
9% Ni steel is commonly utilised in liquefied natural gas storage tanks due to its strong resistance to corrosion and oxidation. However, the welds in these tanks are prone to serious defects, necessitating thorough non-destructive testing. Unfortunately, when inspecting nickel-based alloy welds using phased array ultrasonic testing (PAUT) technology the ultrasonic waves are scattered and attenuated because of the coarse columnar grains. To address this challenge, this paper introduces a based on SVD enhancement directivity corrected circular coherence factor weighted TFM imaging algorithm (SVD-DC-CCF). Initially, the CCF matrix is corrected by the directivity and energy attenuation compensation factors, then weighted with the TFM pixel point amplitude. Subsequently, the weighted amplitude matrix undergoes singular value decomposition (SVD), followed by the establishment of an enhancement factor to reconstruct the amplitude matrix. The proposed algorithm is evaluated through experiments on three types of defects in a 30.0 mm thick 9% Ni steel T-shaped fillet weld test block. Results demonstrate superior signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and enhanced image resolution. Compared to TFM results, the SNR increases by 4.97 dB, 4.25 dB, and 4.96 dB, respectively, while the array performance index (API) decreases by 9.80%, 34.39%, and 22.22%, respectively.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
China Jiliang University
Taizhou Special Equipment Inspection and Testing Research Institute
Ningbo Special Equipment Inspection and Research Institute
Taian Special Equipment Inspection and Research Institute
Funding
Research and Development
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.12989/scs.2019.32.5.57110.12989/scs.2019.32.5.571 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.12.00610.1016/j.cirpj.2021.12.006 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.06.04210.1016/j.jmapro.2021.06.042 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11665-022-07601-x10.1007/s11665-022-07601-x ↗
5. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.10759110.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107591 ↗
6. 10.1007/s12666-020-02181-710.1007/s12666-020-02181-7 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ultras.2021.10658210.1016/j.ultras.2021.106582 ↗
8. 10.1088/1361-6501/ab48a310.1088/1361-6501/ab48a3 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.10232410.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102324 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.11416910.1016/j.measurement.2024.114169 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.04.00210.1016/j.ndteint.2005.04.002 ↗
12. 10.1098/rspa.2015.050010.1098/rspa.2015.0500 ↗
13. 10.1121/1.497395410.1121/1.4973954 ↗
14. 10.1080/10589759.2023.227400110.1080/10589759.2023.2274001 ↗
15. 10.1109/TUFFC.2009.112810.1109/TUFFC.2009.1128 ↗
16. 10.1109/TUFFC.2011.190110.1109/TUFFC.2011.1901 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.10.00710.1016/j.ndteint.2017.10.007 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2021.10260110.1016/j.ndteint.2021.102601 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.10852610.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108526 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.01.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2017.01.005 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2021.10250210.1016/j.ndteint.2021.102502 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.10280510.1016/j.ndteint.2023.102805 ↗
23. 10.1109/TUFFC.2022.316362110.1109/TUFFC.2022.3163621 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.05.00210.1016/j.ndteint.2017.05.002 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.11169010.1016/j.measurement.2022.111690 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.10717410.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107174 ↗
27. 10.1186/s10033-023-00889-310.1186/s10033-023-00889-3 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ultras.2022.10676410.1016/j.ultras.2022.106764 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ultras.2023.10708810.1016/j.ultras.2023.107088 ↗