journal article·2025-06-03

A fast modeling method of pulsed eddy current with double-coil based on model-driven BP neural network

Zhian Xue, Yuan Li, Huirong Hao

Publisher page

Abstract

The analytical model serves as an important guiding role in practical testing. Currently, there is scarce research on the building of the analytical model for pulsed eddy current (PEC) with double-coil excited by a voltage source. This paper derives a frequency-domain model for PEC from a double-coil’s equivalent circuit. To tackle low modeling efficiency due to complex impedance changes and mutual inductance changes, a BP neural network (BPNN) maps lift-off, thickness, and frequency to impedance changes and mutual inductance changes. Training samples for the BPNN come from analytical models of impedance change and mutual inductance change. The study finds that a BPNN with four hidden layers and Bayesian regularization significantly improves prediction accuracy. Finally, the correctness of the BPNN method is verified. The PEC signals obtained by the BPNN method, the analytical model, and the Comsol finite element method are compared under different thicknesses and lift-offs, and it is found that the consistency of the PEC signals of these three methods is very well. And, the amplitudes of the residual signals between the BPNN method and the analytical model of the PEC signals are relatively small, and the relative errors at the peaks are no more than 0.4%.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Magnetic Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Inner Mongolia University of Technology

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Inner Mongolia Autonomous

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.05.01010.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.05.010 ↗
2. 10.1088/1361-6501/ad2dac10.1088/1361-6501/ad2dac ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.12.01210.1016/j.ndteint.2013.12.012 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.01.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2009.01.005 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10921-022-00885-y10.1007/s10921-022-00885-y ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.07.01210.1016/j.ndteint.2013.07.012 ↗
7. 10.1109/TMAG.2008.91948210.1109/TMAG.2008.919482 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.09.00310.1016/j.ndteint.2017.09.003 ↗
9. 10.1784/insi.2020.62.1.2710.1784/insi.2020.62.1.27 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.114730010.1063/1.1147300 ↗
11. 10.1088/1674-1056/27/3/03030110.1088/1674-1056/27/3/030301 ↗
12. 10.1088/0022-3727/38/16/01910.1088/0022-3727/38/16/019 ↗
13. Li S, Yang J, Wang Z, et al. Review of development and application of defect detection technology. Acta Automatica Sin. 2020;46(11):2319–2336.
14. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.16641210.1016/j.jmmm.2020.166412 ↗
15. 10.1134/S106183092102006610.1134/S1061830921020066 ↗
16. 10.1155/2020/886819010.1155/2020/8868190 ↗
17. 10.1109/TIM.2023.326734010.1109/TIM.2023.3267340 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10921-021-00773-x10.1007/s10921-021-00773-x ↗
19. 10.1109/TIE.2023.331242210.1109/TIE.2023.3312422 ↗
20. 10.1177/0954407024123380510.1177/09544070241233805 ↗
21. 10.1186/s13634-024-01119-110.1186/s13634-024-01119-1 ↗
22. 10.1080/10589759.2022.215159810.1080/10589759.2022.2151598 ↗
23. 10.1109/JSEN.2021.312088210.1109/JSEN.2021.3120882 ↗
24. Cao Y, Zandi Y, Agdas AS, et al. A review study of application of artificial intelligence in construction management and composite beams. Steel Composite Struct. 2021;39(6):685–700.