journal article·2025-05-04

Theoretical limits of magnetic detection of structural surface defects at the nanometre scale

Wolfgang Körner, Daniel F. Urban, Christian Elsässer

Publisher page

Abstract

We present a theoretical study on the magnetic signals of structural surface defects like cracks or indents combined with inhomogeneities on the surface or subsurface inclusions of soft ferromagnetic metals like body-centred cubic Fe or amorphous CoFeB. We discuss limits of early detection of small surface defects on the basis of calculated magnetic stray fields few tens of nm above the surface. The considered surface imperfections have extensions of a few nm which correspond to low multiples of the magnetic exchange lengths of Fe or CoFeB. The detection of such small inhomogeneities requires that the sensor is about as close to the surface as the size of the inhomogeneity is. Furthermore, the step width of a scanning sensor must be of the same size as well. Both these requirements may be fulfilled for instance by scanning microscopy with diamond nitrogen-vacancy-centre quantum sensors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Fraunhofer Institute for Mechanics of Materials IWM

University of Freiburg

Funding

Fraunhofer (collaboration research project “Quantum Magnetometry Application Laboratory

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13246010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132460 ↗
2. 10.1080/10589759.2022.203815010.1080/10589759.2022.2038150 ↗
3. Wang Y, Zoughi R. Interaction of surface cracks in metals with open ended coaxial probes at microwave frequencies. Mater Eval. 2000;58:1228.
4. Wang N, Zoughi R. Moment method solution for modeling the interaction of open ended coaxial probes and surface cracks in metals. Mater Eval. 2002;60:1253.
5. 10.3390/met608017210.3390/met6080172 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10630810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106308 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.10756410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107564 ↗
8. 10.1002/ente.20230101210.1002/ente.202301012 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msea.2024.14625710.1016/j.msea.2024.146257 ↗
10. 10.1007/s11340-015-0027-z10.1007/s11340-015-0027-z ↗
11. 10.1007/s11340-021-00758-x10.1007/s11340-021-00758-x ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10682410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106824 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matchar.2022.11205910.1016/j.matchar.2022.112059 ↗
14. 10.1038/s42254-021-00380-910.1038/s42254-021-00380-9 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.489918610.1063/1.4899186 ↗
16. 10.1016/B978-0-08-036364-6.50008-910.1016/B978-0-08-036364-6.50008-9 ↗
17. 10.1109/TMAG.2004.83674010.1109/TMAG.2004.836740 ↗
18. Exl L, Suess D, Schrefl T. Micromagnetism. In: Coey M, and Parkin S, editors. Handbook of magnetism and magnetic materials. Cham: Springer; 2021. p. 16.
19. 10.1063/1.490767710.1063/1.4907677 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.487592710.1063/1.4875927 ↗
21. 10.1109/20.61969810.1109/20.619698 ↗
22. 10.1017/CBO978051184500010.1017/CBO9780511845000 ↗
23. Ayachit U. The ParaView guide: A parallel visualization application kitware. ISBN 9781930934306. 2015.
24. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0530410.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05304 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41467-018-04798-110.1038/s41467-018-04798-1 ↗
26. 10.1088/0953-2048/22/6/06401310.1088/0953-2048/22/6/064013 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.08140610.1103/PhysRevB.86.081406 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.10516310.1016/j.rinp.2021.105163 ↗