journal article·2014-01-02

Effect of system variables on the uncertainty of the mass point leak rate methodology using first-order regression

Christopher C. Daniels, Nicholas G. Garafolo

Publisher page

Abstract

Advances in nondestructive testing for leak rate characterisation are rare because procedures are well accepted; however, for many critical applications, an understanding of the accuracy and reliability of a reported leak rate is equally as important as the leak rate itself (e.g., manned spacecraft and nuclear power industry). Although it is known that the mass point leak rate method can achieve high accuracies, the measurement uncertainty and limitations of the method are less understood. Using a least-squares regression on a mass–time population and a statistical analysis of regression uncertainty, this study investigated the influence of (1) differential pressure, (2) steady-state and transient temperature, (3) volume size, (4) gas type, (5) sampling time duration, and (6) sampling interval on the reported mass point leak rate value. The analyses accounted for all significant sources of error. An experimental evaluation and validation of the method were conducted on a capillary-type, National Institute of Standards and Technology traceable leak standard and, where appropriate, simultaneous measurements were taken using a helium leak detector for comparison. The mass point technique was shown to provide high-accuracy results for various gases and volume sizes. Across the range of temperatures and pressures, the uncertainty measurements of the mass point technique were between ± 0.34% and ± 0.72%. When the temperature of the test section was varied ± 5°C during the experiment, the mass point technique results deviated 2–4% from those of the standard.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Groundwater flow and contamination studies · Water Systems and Optimization · Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. Garafolo NG · Res Nondestruct Eval. · 2013
2. Garafolo NG, Daniels CC. Comprehensive mass point leak rate technique. Part I: methodology with uncertainty and experimental error analysis, JSNDI/ASNT Fourth Japan – US Symposium on Emerging NDE Capabilities for a Safer World, Maui, Hawaii; 7–11 June 2010.
3. MoorePO., JacksonCNJr., SherlockCN, editors. Nondestructive testing handbook, leak testing. 3rd ed., Vol. 1. American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Inc; 1998.
4. 10.2514/1.A3204910.2514/1.A32049 ↗
5. 10.1115/1.400641810.1115/1.4006418 ↗
6. Garafolo NG, Daniels CC. An experimental investigation of leak rate performance of a subscale composite elastomer-retainer docking seal. J Spacecraft Rockets. 2013;50(3):709–714. doi:10.2514/1.A32380.10.2514/1.A32380 ↗
7. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Project technical requirements specification for the low impact docking system (LIDS) government furnished equipment (GFE), No. JSC-63686 REV. A; 2008 26 September.
8. American Nuclear Society.Containment system leakage testing requirements, ANSI/ANS-56.8-2002 (R2011); 2011.
9. Wash-1400
10. Wash-1400. The reactor safety study, nuclear regulatory commission. Washington, DC; 1975.
11. 10.1115/1.282068310.1115/1.2820683 ↗
12. American National Standards Institute. American National Standard of Calibration – U.S. Guide to Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. NCSL International, R2007 ED. Boulder, CO; 1997.
13. 2009