journal article·2022-03-04

Measurement of core bond strength in reinforced concrete column using magneto rheological fluid assisted Ultrasonic measuring technique

S. Herald Lessly, Senthil Rajendran

Publisher page

Abstract

The present work deals with the investigation of core compressive strength in reinforced concrete column with the slip angle orientation and bond stress relationship using Magneto rheological fluid (MR fluid)-based non-destructive testing principle. Ultrasonic method is used to obtain the crack width and slip angle orientation of the rebar. In addition to that, the bond strength can be determined through the rheological disturbance in the MR fluid medium. Experiments to determine the axial compression behaviour of cylindrical concrete specimens were carried out by placing the MR fluid discs at three distinct zones. Ultrasonic waves were generated and scattered over the MR fluid disc based on two different angles of propagation (90ᴼ and 45ᴼ). The results demonstrated that the percentage of variation in the measured rebar strain for M30/RRD 1.0 is found to be 25.75% of the values measured for M30/RRD 0.5. The maximum bond strength is found to be 24.63 MPa for M30/RRD 1.5 with slip orientation angle of 14ᴼ. Moreover, the minimum difference in the observed values of ultrasound pulse velocity was −0.78 m/s for M20/RRD 1.0 with the magnetic field strength of 40 mT.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Concrete Properties and Behavior · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Guindy, Anna University, Chennai, India

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.09410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.094 ↗
2. Model code for concrete structures 2010. International Federation for structural concrete: fib. CEB-FIP; 2013.
3. Bond of reinforcement in concrete: State – of- Art report. Bulletin 10.fib. CEB-FIP; 2000.
4. 10.1002/eqe.297410.1002/eqe.2974 ↗
5. Mains RM. · ACI J Proc · 1951 · 48 · 225
6. fib Bulletin 10. Bond of reinforcement in concrete; 2000.
7. Goto Y · ACI J Proc · 1971 · 68 · 244
8. Fernandez Ruiz M · J Struct Engg · 2007 · 133 · 1
9. 10.3390/s1804098010.3390/s18040980 ↗
10. correlated solutions, Vic- 3D. Reference manual; 2010.
11. 10.1002/suco.20170005910.1002/suco.201700059 ↗
12. ASTM E3100-17 · 2017
13. Ohtsu M · 2015
14. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.02.00610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.02.006 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.02.00210.1016/j.cemconres.2013.02.002 ↗
16. 10.1177/147592171246116210.1177/1475921712461162 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.12.03710.1016/j.engstruct.2013.12.037 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.02.02010.1016/j.engstruct.2010.02.020 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.04410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.044 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.05410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.054 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.04410.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.044 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.01310.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.013 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00137-610.1016/S0008-8846(03)00137-6 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.05110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.051 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.10.01210.1016/j.cemconres.2003.10.012 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.autcon.2005.07.00310.1016/j.autcon.2005.07.003 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matdes.2006.10.00910.1016/j.matdes.2006.10.009 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0304-8853(02)00680-710.1016/S0304-8853(02)00680-7 ↗
29. Melle S · 2002
30. Masaakimotozawa and Tatsuo Saw Ada · Int J Modern Phys B · 2007 · 21 · 4914
31. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.11.04010.1016/j.jmmm.2010.11.040 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.72710.1103/PhysRevLett.82.727 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ultras.2007.08.00210.1016/j.ultras.2007.08.002 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.09.00610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.09.006 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.pnucene.2004.09.01510.1016/j.pnucene.2004.09.015 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2011.08.01910.1016/j.jmmm.2011.08.019 ↗
37. Motozawa M · 2005
38. Aouar WH, Finite element analysis based modeling of magnetorheological dampers. M.S Thesis. Virginia: Polytechnic Institute and state University; 2002.
39. 10.1021/ie400864d10.1021/ie400864d ↗
40. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.01.01210.1016/j.cemconres.2009.01.012 ↗
41. 10.1016/0950-0618(96)00003-710.1016/0950-0618(96)00003-7 ↗
42. Ali HAM · Chin J Phys · 602
43. Duddu · 2012 · 1
44. Duddu and Pulugurtha · Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect · 2017 · 100250
45. 10.1038/323533a010.1038/323533a0 ↗
46. Vora K · Int J Eng Dev Res · 2014 · 1 · 193
47. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11996810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119968 ↗
48. Bramantya MA · J Phys · 2010 · 22 · 1
49. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:11(1690)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:11(1690) ↗
50. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11790210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117902 ↗
51. Bramantya MA · 2008 · 1