Non-destructive testing and assessment of dynamic incompatibility between third-party piping and drain valve systems: an industrial case study
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents the outcome of an industrial case study that involved condition monitoring of piping system that showed signs of excess fatigue due to flow-induced vibration. Due to operational requirements, a novel non-destructive assessment stratagem was adopted using different vibration analysis techniques - such as experimental modal analysis and operating deflection shapes - and complemented by visual inspection. Modal analysis carried out near a drain valve showed a dynamic weakness problem (several high-frequency flow-induced vibration frequency peaks), hence condition-based monitoring was used. This could easily be linked to design problem associated with the dynamic incompatibility due to dissimilar stiffness between two third-party supplied pipe and valve systems. It was concluded that this is the main cause for these problem types especially when systems are supplied by third parties, but assembled locally, a major cause of dynamic incompatibility. It is the local assembler's responsibility to develop skills and expertise needed to sustain the operation of these plants. This paper shows the technique used as result of one such initiative. Since high amplitude, low-frequency displacement can cause low cycle fatigue, attention must be paid to ensure flow remains as steady state as possible. The ability to assess the level of design incompatibility and the level of modification required using non-destructive testing is vital if these systems are to work continuously. © 2014 Taylor & Francis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Agency ONE. Nuclear power plant operating experiences from the IAEA/NEA incident reporting system. 2002–2005. p. 1–56. France: OECD Publication; 2006.
2. 10.1115/1.802700.ch3710.1115/1.802700.ch37 ↗
3. OlsonDE. Pipe vibration testing and analysis. Companion guide to the ASME boiler & pressure vessel code (Vol. Chapter 37). New York, NY: ASME; 2002.
4. Garison WG. Major fires and explosions analyzed for 30-year period, Hydrocarbon Process. 1988;67:115–120.
5. Olson DE. Piping vibration experience in power plants, pressure vessel and piping technology, a decade of progress. Book No. H0030. New York: ASME; 1985.
6. Wachel JC, Morton SJ, Atkins KE. Piping vibration analysis. 19th Turbomachinery Symposium; 1990 Sep; Texas A&M University.
7. WachelJC. Piping vibration and stress,vibration institute, machinery vibration monitoring and analysis seminar; 1981 Apr; New Orleans, LA. p. 1–20.
8. Wachel JC. Displacement method for determining acceptable piping vibration amplitudes, PVP-Vol. 313-2. Vol. 2, International pressure vessels and piping codes and standards. New York: ASME; 1995.
9. RaoSS. Mechanical vibration. SI ed.London: Prentice Hall; 2005.
10. BlevinsRD. Flow induced vibration. 2nd ed.New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1990.
11. ChenSS. Flow-induced vibration of circular cylindrical structures. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation; 1987.
12. Dai HL, Wang L, Qian Q, Gan J. Vibration analysis of three-dimensional pipes conveying fluid with consideration of steady combined force by transfer matrix method, Appl Math Comput.2012;219:2453–2464.10.1016/j.amc.2012.08.081 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.07.00110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.07.001 ↗
14. 10.1016/0308-0161(95)00022-410.1016/0308-0161(95)00022-4 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0308-0161(02)00085-610.1016/S0308-0161(02)00085-6 ↗
16. ChenSS. Flow-induced vibration of circular cylindrical structures. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation; 1987.
17. 10.1016/j.jsv.2007.05.02310.1016/j.jsv.2007.05.023 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jsv.2007.06.04610.1016/j.jsv.2007.06.046 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jsv.2011.05.02210.1016/j.jsv.2011.05.022 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jsv.2010.02.01010.1016/j.jsv.2010.02.010 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2006.06.00310.1016/j.ijpvp.2006.06.003 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jsv.2005.02.03210.1016/j.jsv.2005.02.032 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jsv.2003.06.03010.1016/j.jsv.2003.06.030 ↗
24. 10.1115/1.141037010.1115/1.1410370 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.08.02410.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.08.024 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.10.01810.1016/j.ymssp.2009.10.018 ↗
27. DossingO, StakerCH. Operational deflection shapes: background. measurement and applications. Proceedings of the 5th International Modal Analysis Conference; 1987 April 6-9; London, Imperial College of Science & Technology (UK): Union College, Graduate and Continuing Studies;1987.
28. MarscherWD, JenCW. Use of operating deflection and mode shapes for machinery diagnostics. Proc. SPIE Vol. 3727, Bethel, CT, USA. Proceedings of the 17th International Modal Analysis Conference; 1999; Florida (USA).
29. McHargue PL, Richardson MH. Operating detection shapes from time versus frequency domain measurements. IMAC-XI The 11th International Modal Analysis Conference and Exposition; 1993; Florida (USA): SEM Proceedings, Bethel, CT, USA, 1993.
30. Pascual R, Golinval JC, Razeto M. On-line damage assessment using operating detection shapes. In: Wicks, AL, DeMichele, DJ Proceedings of 17th International Modal Analysis Conference; 1999 February 8–11; Florida: Society of Photo-optical Instrumentation Engineers, Society for Experimental Mechanics (U.S.)1999.
31. TongueBH. Principles of vibration. 2nd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
32. 10.1016/S0308-0161(03)00132-710.1016/S0308-0161(03)00132-7 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.06.00910.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.06.009 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.03.01310.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.03.013 ↗
35. 10.1016/S1644-9665(12)60103-410.1016/S1644-9665(12)60103-4 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.01.04910.1016/j.measurement.2012.01.049 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.03.00610.1016/j.measurement.2012.03.006 ↗
38. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000035310.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000353 ↗
39. 10.1177/107754630404137010.1177/1077546304041370 ↗
40. Ong ZC, Rahman AGA, Ismail Z. Determination of damage severity on rotor shaft due to crack using damage index derived from experimental modal data, Exp Techniques. Forthcoming 2012.10.1111/j.1747-1567.2012.00823.x ↗
41. 10.1177/105678951246675510.1177/1056789512466755 ↗