Simulation based on optimisation of pulsed eddy current probe design
Source abstract
Abstract
There is a need for a pulsed eddy current (PEC) to detect very small defects and deep buried subsurface flaws reliably in metallic structures such as aircraft wings. This paper reports an investigation into the sensitivity for a pancake PEC probe to variations in the material conductivity of specimens. Three experimental coil parameters are modelled: (a) coil inner radius, (b) coil width and (c) coil height. Based on the predicted signals, the sensitivity of the PEC probe as a function of coil parameters has been formulated. Through matrix numerical simulation experiments using orthogonal array, the weighting of each parameter to the sensitivity has been derived. Subsequently, a theoretical model for probe optimisation is established in order to realise the maximum sensitivity, based on which a probe is designed with improved sensitivity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. R.A. Smith, Capabilities and limitations of transient eddy-currents in multi-layered aircraft skins, Proceedings of the NDT 2000, British Institute of NDT, September (2000), pp. 211–216
2. Renken C.J. · Mater. Eval. · 2001 · 59 · 356
3. F. Thollon and N. Burais, Modelling and characterization of pulsed eddy current. Application to NDT of riveted assemblies in aeronautic structures, Second International Workshop on Electric and Magnetic Fields, Leuven, Belgium, 18–20 May (1994)10.1007/978-1-4615-1961-4_59 ↗
4. F. Thollon, B. Lebrun, N. Burais, and Y. Jayet, Eddy current NDT of installed fasteners in aircraft structures: Simulation and experimental results, 6th ECNDT, Nice, France, 24–28 October (1994)10.1016/0963-8695(94)00010-H ↗
5. 10.1109/20.37644110.1109/20.376441 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.165668010.1063/1.1656680 ↗
7. 10.1784/insi.2006.48.2.10310.1784/insi.2006.48.2.103 ↗
8. 10.1109/TMAG.2008.200624610.1109/TMAG.2008.2006246 ↗
9. 10.1109/TMAG.2007.90493010.1109/TMAG.2007.904930 ↗
10. 10.1109/TMAG.2004.82500910.1109/TMAG.2004.825009 ↗
11. 10.1109/TMAG.1985.106418410.1109/TMAG.1985.1064184 ↗
12. J. Wilde and Y. Lai, Design optimization of an eddy current sensor using the finite-elements method, European Microelectronics Packaging and Interconnection Symposium Cracow, Poland, 16–18 June (2002)
13. Comsol, User's Handbook of Comsol Multiphysics, 2006
14. 10.1109/TMAG.2006.87704210.1109/TMAG.2006.877042 ↗
15. Taguchi G. · 1987