Research on hydrogen-indulced damage detection technology using shear horizontal SH 0 mode nonlinear ultrasonic guided waves
Source abstract
Abstract
Hydrogen-enriched natural gas pipelines are vulnerable to hydrogen-induced damage, such as cracking, over time, posing safety risks. Regular inspection of high-grade steel pipelines in hydrogen-rich environments is crucial. Ultrasonic testing, known for its sensitivity to early internal defects in plate-like structures, is a promising method for detecting such anomalies. However, its effectiveness in detecting hydrogen-induced damage in pipelines has not been fully validated. This study proposes using Shear Horizontal (SH0) mode nonlinear ultrasonic guided waves for detecting hydrogen-induced damage. X80 steel was selected for the research, with pre-tensile and electrochemical hydrogen charging experiments to prepare the samples. Nonlinear ultrasonic testing with SH0 guided waves was conducted on samples with varying damage levels to observe changes in the ultrasonic nonlinear coefficient during the damage process. A microcrack cluster damage model was developed using MATLAB and COMSOL, combining finite element analysis and 3D X-ray Microscopy (XRM) to explore the relationship between nonlinear ultrasound and hydrogen damage. Results show that as cracks propagate, the nonlinear coefficient first increases and then decreases. Simulations reveal the propagation mechanism of nonlinear ultrasound in hydrogen-induced damage, providing theoretical support for enhanced detection. This approach improves the ability to detect hydrogen-induced damage in pipelines.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Inner Mongolia University
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Young Talents in Higher Education Institutions of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.26945/d.cnki.gbjku.2023.00046710.26945/d.cnki.gbjku.2023.000467 ↗
2. 10.3390/ma1513455110.3390/ma15134551 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.10494810.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104948 ↗
4. Trimborn N. Detecting and quantifying high temperature hydrogen attack (HTHA). In: 19th World Conference on Non-Destructive Testing (WCNDT 2016); 13-17 June 2016; Munich, Germany. e-Journal of Nondestructive Testing. 2016; 21(7). https://www.ndt.net/?id=19344.
5. 10.1007/978-1-4615-2848-7_21110.1007/978-1-4615-2848-7_211 ↗
6. Voillaume H, Costain J, Murray D. Phased array ultrasound and total focusing method for the detection and sizing of HTHA and HIC in critical pressurized components. In: NDE 2019 - Conference & Exhibition; 5-7 Dec 2019; Bengaluru, India. 2019. https://www.ndt.net/?id=25756.
7. 10.1080/0950711880944751110.1080/09507118809447511 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.10976510.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109765 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.130615910.1063/1.1306159 ↗
10. 10.26935/d.cnki.gbjgu.2020.00003410.26935/d.cnki.gbjgu.2020.000034 ↗
11. Hong H. Research and design of sensor mechanisms for weld defect detection based on characteristic guided waves[d]. Jiangsu University; 2018. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=TI3o-D_a8xnwmqUJm4C0N6aw2ITwrprRBcRdm2eXOMsJQ18crA0mV_Y4qbtZpmTUcPN55_kqLsZstFDHtBPwPMEan_2Y2M36ptSLZhlgLYyjENwF4tZv4xZltgh6NTtOyC5Wv88E-xIyIb9KSPjGU0snBFJ5dHDKnkEU6MZGSt7RpyczyQ7amCSdW0DMHvjB&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS.
12. 10.26944/d.cnki.gbfju.2020.00309810.26944/d.cnki.gbfju.2020.003098 ↗
13. Han J. Research on defect detection methods for aluminum plates using SH0 mode guided wave full-focus imaging technology. Electr Power Sci Technol Environ Protect. 2022;38(6):484–491.
14. 10.26991/d.cnki.gdllu.2022.00235510.26991/d.cnki.gdllu.2022.002355 ↗
15. 10.27670/d.cnki.gcqdu.2022.00238810.27670/d.cnki.gcqdu.2022.002388 ↗
16. 10.26991/d.cnki.gdllu.2021.00257210.26991/d.cnki.gdllu.2021.002572 ↗
17. 10.11973/wsjc20200401110.11973/wsjc202004011 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ultras.2018.03.00810.1016/j.ultras.2018.03.008 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.05.03610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.05.036 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.218454010.1063/1.2184540 ↗
21. 10.1143/JJAP.40.357910.1143/JJAP.40.3579 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.501380310.1063/1.5013803 ↗
23. 10.26991/d.cnki.gdllu.2020.00224410.26991/d.cnki.gdllu.2020.002244 ↗
24. 10.1177/147592171878445110.1177/1475921718784451 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.10.00610.1016/j.ndteint.2016.10.006 ↗
26. 10.1007/s10921-014-0273-510.1007/s10921-014-0273-5 ↗
27. 10.1117/1.OE.55.1.01100210.1117/1.OE.55.1.011002 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.10302710.1016/j.ndteint.2023.103027 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ultras.2017.12.01110.1016/j.ultras.2017.12.011 ↗
30. 10.1088/1402-4896/ad418c10.1088/1402-4896/ad418c ↗
31. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/8/08501910.1088/0964-1726/23/8/085019 ↗
32. Boivin G, Viens M, Belanger P. Development of a low frequency shear horizontal piezoelectric transducer for the generation of plane SH waves. AIP Conf Proc. 2016;1706(3):0019.
33. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.04.00110.1016/j.ndteint.2016.04.001 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.363869110.1063/1.3638691 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.493168510.1063/1.4931685 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.493678110.1063/1.4936781 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.494847310.1063/1.4948473 ↗
38. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/11/11LT0110.1088/0964-1726/25/11/11LT01 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ultras.2016.10.01110.1016/j.ultras.2016.10.011 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ultras.2019.06.00110.1016/j.ultras.2019.06.001 ↗
41. 10.1080/10589759.2023.217037210.1080/10589759.2023.2170372 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.matchar.2022.11173610.1016/j.matchar.2022.111736 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.corsci.2023.11163810.1016/j.corsci.2023.111638 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.matchar.2022.11173610.1016/j.matchar.2022.111736 ↗
45. 10.1007/s11663-023-02882-610.1007/s11663-023-02882-6 ↗
46. 10.1007/s11837-024-06706-z10.1007/s11837-024-06706-z ↗
47. 10.27061/d.cnki.ghgdu.2023.00124110.27061/d.cnki.ghgdu.2023.001241 ↗
48. 10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61097-210.1016/S1003-6326(11)61097-2 ↗
49. 10.1063/1.487941510.1063/1.4879415 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ultras.2023.10694510.1016/j.ultras.2023.106945 ↗
51. 10.27034/d.cnki.ggxiu.2022.00215010.27034/d.cnki.ggxiu.2022.002150 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.08.04610.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.08.046 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.piutam.2012.03.00210.1016/j.piutam.2012.03.002 ↗
54. 10.3139/146.11036810.3139/146.110368 ↗
55. Meng X. Research on nonlinear ultrasonic detection method for closed cracks in metal plates based on mixing frequency [D]. Beijing University of Technology; 2017. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=TI3o-D_a8xnUsaMpPBWt58KJfhOQRL47z_tbMd92H0mh6Ybwt_TeTfTdBv_NhfGOBrieaae6PIwiBPZ9ZYTmEpCROlEPeGpFm3bvttLSDh1mxMEXfD_mBkdK6rR4y1-G3eVgJlpZMB5kOyk9WCmmEmMBiRG5HY9br5Yk7E6C4owFLw0HYE8yRRjk1mCAeXGT&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS.
56. Zhuang D. Study on ultrasonic response characteristics of metal plastic deformation [D]. Hebei University of Technology; 2015. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=TI3o-D_a8xlaL_vzXjU22bv1OrwsjZv_4S2QGkIW4XcHlEewQJVWdPP4PWVMSUEkVId92fFGgWMCZq7L84fiBfawAfHUDM8xzrucpikhVIahrzaJWl7bgCEYVy_NXYcnLBY--4QmSLw0MeDFssk9S0E0Qd0PP77Rs_SYwWpW3MrUS3zeO5sAEThQQC444_fe&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS.
57. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.01.03810.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.01.038 ↗
58. Matlack KH, Wall JJ, Jacobs LJ, et al. Nonlinear ultrasound to monitor radiation damage in structural steel. 6th Eur Workshop Struct Health Monit. 2012;18(4):1–8.
59. 10.1063/1.36432710.1063/1.364327 ↗
60. 10.1007/s10921-015-0323-710.1007/s10921-015-0323-7 ↗
61. 10.1098/rspa.2003.118110.1098/rspa.2003.1181 ↗
62. 10.1121/1.40565110.1121/1.405651 ↗
63. 10.1121/1.41957710.1121/1.419577 ↗
64. 10.1080/1478643050036535810.1080/14786430500365358 ↗