Ultrasonic imaging of concrete-embedded corroded steel liners using linear and nonlinear evaluation
Source abstract
Abstract
This study explores the efficacy of horizontally polarised shear (SH) waves in ultrasonic inspection of concrete-embedded steel liner plates, focusing on corrosion detection. SH-waves are found to significantly improve the localisation and potential dimensional assessment of embedded plate-like structures compared to compressional (P) waves, as evidenced by SH C-scans. Anomalies corresponding to severe corrosion are discernible in SH C-scans, whereas they are minimally visible in P-wave scans. Nonlinear evaluation explores harmonic-based imaging, including second harmonic generation (SHG) and third harmonic generation. Nonlinear SH-wave evaluation accurately locates the most severely corroded embedded plate, whereas comparative P-wave evaluations fail. However, potential FFT sidelobe contamination in the results warrants consideration. These results suggest a promising use for nonlinear waveform distortion in SH-wave-based corrosion detection though conclusive evidence of the source of SHG is uncertain. Experiments utilised an automatic scanner system for consistent control. The concrete specimen investigated herein contained pre-corroded plates which hint at heightened nonlinear effects when corrosion occurs post-embedment due to corrosion-induced cracking. These findings encourage further investigation into SH-waves for nonlinear ultrasonic detection of concrete-embedded steel liner plates and the development of instrumentation tailored to such methods.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Lund university
Funding
Energiforsk
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.03610.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.036 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.anucene.2022.10948710.1016/j.anucene.2022.109487 ↗
3. 10.1201/978100322301610.1201/9781003223016 ↗
4. 10.1186/s43065-020-00012-z10.1186/s43065-020-00012-z ↗
5. 10.1016/j.trac.2013.09.00710.1016/j.trac.2013.09.007 ↗
6. 10.1016/0301-5629(76)90033-810.1016/0301-5629(76)90033-8 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ultras.2024.10727710.1016/j.ultras.2024.107277 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.11418110.1016/j.measurement.2024.114181 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.11015510.1016/j.measurement.2021.110155 ↗
10. 10.1080/10589759.2022.212348110.1080/10589759.2022.2123481 ↗
11. 10.1134/S106377101002005310.1134/S1063771010020053 ↗
12. Kyung-Young J, Lissenden CJ, Solodov I, et al. Measurement of nonlinear ultrasonic characteristics. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2020.
13. 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.11210610.1016/j.measurement.2022.112106 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jsv.2024.11842910.1016/j.jsv.2024.118429 ↗
15. 10.3390/ma1706128810.3390/ma17061288 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10921-014-0273-510.1007/s10921-014-0273-5 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.35746310.1063/1.357463 ↗
18. 10.3367/ufnr.0176.200601g.009710.3367/ufnr.0176.200601g.0097 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.10302710.1016/j.ndteint.2023.103027 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00241-X10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00241-X ↗
21. 10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00186-510.1016/S0041-624X(02)00186-5 ↗
22. 10.1070/PU1971v013n06ABEH00428110.1070/PU1971v013n06ABEH004281 ↗
23. 10.1070/PU2006v049n01ABEH00587610.1070/PU2006v049n01ABEH005876 ↗
24. 10.1109/TUFFC.2004.132076310.1109/TUFFC.2004.1320763 ↗
25. 10.3390/infrastructures803005310.3390/infrastructures8030053 ↗
26. 10.1109/ULTSYM.2000.92266810.1109/ULTSYM.2000.922668 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.482125210.1063/1.4821252 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jsv.2023.11773210.1016/j.jsv.2023.117732 ↗
29. 10.1109/ULTSYM.2002.119351810.1109/ULTSYM.2002.1193518 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.00210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.002 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jsv.2022.11724710.1016/j.jsv.2022.117247 ↗
32. 10.1177/1475921721105713810.1177/14759217211057138 ↗
33. 10.3390/cmd302001410.3390/cmd3020014 ↗
34. 10.1121/10.000962110.1121/10.0009621 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13369110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133691 ↗
36. 10.1177/147592172093698310.1177/1475921720936983 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ultras.2004.12.00510.1016/j.ultras.2004.12.005 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.00510.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.005 ↗
39. 10.1109/JSEN.2016.263124410.1109/JSEN.2016.2631244 ↗
40. 10.1109/TIM.2018.286926310.1109/TIM.2018.2869263 ↗
41. 10.1109/TIM.2019.290870410.1109/TIM.2019.2908704 ↗
42. 10.1109/LGRS.2019.295257110.1109/LGRS.2019.2952571 ↗
43. 10.1007/s10921-020-00745-710.1007/s10921-020-00745-7 ↗
44. 10.1109/TIM.2005.86125110.1109/TIM.2005.861251 ↗
45. 10.1016/0020-7225(79)90008-910.1016/0020-7225(79)90008-9 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2010.09.00210.1016/j.ndteint.2010.09.002 ↗
47. 10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00125-910.1016/S0029-5493(99)00125-9 ↗
48. Nilsson M, Ulriksen P, Rydén N. Studies into the Use of non-linear ultrasound to detect corroded steel plates embedded in concrete. In: Al-Neshawy F, Ferreira M, and Bohner E, et al. editors. Proceedings of the International Conference on Non-destructive Evaluation of Concrete in Nuclear Applications, Espoo, Finland. Aalto University; 2023. p. 259–267.
49. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.10437610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104376 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12291510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122915 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.dib.2022.10823510.1016/j.dib.2022.108235 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.ultras.2017.06.02010.1016/j.ultras.2017.06.020 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ultras.2017.10.02210.1016/j.ultras.2017.10.022 ↗
54. 10.3390/ma1417485510.3390/ma14174855 ↗
55. 10.3390/MA1205081310.3390/MA12050813 ↗
56. 10.1134/S106377101704006610.1134/S1063771017040066 ↗