Determining the effects of timber strength and wood species on the mechanical properties of CLT using non-destructive and destructive methods
Source abstract
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the effects of production parameters such as wood species and timber strength classes on some mechanical properties of CLT panels using both non-destructive and destructive methods. Additionally, the study compared the strength values obtained from non-destructive and destructive testing methods on CLT panels and elucidated the relationship between them through regression analyses. CLT panels were produced using spruce and alder timbers, as well as hybrid panels formed from combinations of these two wood species. According to the TS EN 338 standard, the C and D strength classes of the timbers were determined non-destructively using an acoustic testing device. Among the timbers whose strength classes were determined, a total of 6 different strength classes were selected for spruce and alder. The bending strength, modulus of elasticity, and screw withdrawal force tests were performed on the CLT panel groups both non-destructive and destructive. As a result of the regression analyzes, the determination coefficient (R2) between non-destructive screw withdrawal force and destructive bending strength values varied between 0.6135–0,9997. Moreover, the R2 value calculated between non-destructive and destructive modulus of elasticity values for CLT panels was found to be between 0.7076–0.9997.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wood Treatment and Properties · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Karadeniz Technical University
HC Panel Forest Products Consulting Services Industry and Trade Limited Company
Funding
TUBITAK
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. 2018 IBC. Group A tall mass timber proposals review guide. American wood council. 2021 [2021 Mar 20]. Available from: www.awc.org/tallmasstimber
2. 10.13073/FPJ-D-20-0007610.13073/FPJ-D-20-00076 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.10185610.1016/j.jobe.2020.101856 ↗
4. Larasatie P, Albee R, Muszynski L, et al. Global CLT industry survey: the 2020 updates. In: World Conference on Timber Engineering; Santiago, Chile. WCTE; 2020. p. 1–8.
5. 10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.13210.1016/j.procir.2016.11.132 ↗
6. 10.1109/SIU.2014.683024810.1109/SIU.2014.6830248 ↗
7. Yüncüler M. TS 647 ve Avrupa ahşap yapı standardı Eurocode-5’in örneklerle karşılaştırılması [Master’s thesis]. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü); 2019.
8. TS EN 338. Structural timber – strength classes. Ankara: Turkish Standards Institution; 2016.
9. 10.5552/drind.2017.172810.5552/drind.2017.1728 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.07610.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.076 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.09110.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.091 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.04.05210.1016/j.engstruct.2017.04.052 ↗
13. 10.1007/978-981-15-0802-8_2610.1007/978-981-15-0802-8_26 ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000191210.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001912 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.05.09010.1016/j.engstruct.2019.05.090 ↗
16. 10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.11-62610.3801/IAFSS.FSS.11-626 ↗
17. 10.1617/s11527-017-1069-810.1617/s11527-017-1069-8 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cscm.2016.03.00410.1016/j.cscm.2016.03.004 ↗
19. 10.3390/su902029210.3390/su9020292 ↗
20. 10.1007/978-981-13-7603-0_1910.1007/978-981-13-7603-0_19 ↗
21. 10.1680/jcoma.15.0006310.1680/jcoma.15.00063 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.11774110.1016/j.indcrop.2023.117741 ↗
23. 10.1007/s40725-018-0071-x10.1007/s40725-018-0071-x ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11689510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116895 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10552610.1016/j.jobe.2022.105526 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00342-010.1016/S0022-460X(03)00342-0 ↗
27. 10.3390/f1212173410.3390/f12121734 ↗
28. 10.1007/s00107-020-01644-410.1007/s00107-020-01644-4 ↗
29. Hellier CJ. Handbook of nondestructive evaluation. 2nd ed. US: McGraw-Hill Professional; 2012.
30. Bell ER Peck EC Krueger NT. Young’s modulus of wood determined by a dynamic method. Report 1775. Madison (WI): U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory; 1950.
31. Galiginaitis SV Bell ER Fine AM et al. Nondestructive testing of wood laminates. Final report. Office of Naval Research University of Louisville Institute of Industrial Research; 1954.
32. Jayne BA. Mechanical properties of wood fibres. 1959.
33. James WL. Dynamics strength and elastic properties of wood. 1962.
34. 10.1520/STP45112S10.1520/STP45112S ↗
35. Senft JF, Suddarth SK, Angleton HD. A new approach to stress grading of lumber. For Prod J. 1962;12:183–186.
36. Pellerin RF, Ross RJ. Nondestructive evaluation of wood. Madison (WI), USA: Forest Products Society; 2002. p. 210.
37. 10.1007/s43452-021-00288-210.1007/s43452-021-00288-2 ↗
38. 10.1080/15583058.2021.191923910.1080/15583058.2021.1919239 ↗
39. 10.1080/10589759.2020.172826710.1080/10589759.2020.1728267 ↗
40. Thelandersson S, Larsen HJ. Timber engineering. Hoboken, New Jersey, United States: John Wiley & Sons; 2003.
41. Yılmaz S, Karahasan OŞ, Altunışık AC, et al. A new type notched slab approach for timber-concrete composite construction: experimental and numerical investigation. Struct Eng Mech, An Int’l J. 2022;81(6):737–750.
42. TS 1265. Sawn timber (coniferous) - for building construction. Ankara: Turkish Standards Institution; 2012.
43. TS EN 14081. Timber structures - strength graded structural timber with rectangular cross section - part 1: general requirements. Ankara: Turkish Standards Institution; 2019.
44. TS EN 408+A1. Timber structures - structural timber and glued laminated timber - determination of some physical and mechanical properties. Ankara: Turkish Standards Institution; 2014.
45. Park HM, Fushitani M, Byeon HS, et al. Static bending strength performances of Cross-laminated wood panels made with six species. Wood Fiber Sci. 2016;48(2):1–13.
46. 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.06.00210.1016/j.istruc.2022.06.002 ↗
47. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:1(132)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:1(132) ↗
48. 10.1007/s00107-011-0521-710.1007/s00107-011-0521-7 ↗
49. ANSI/APA PRG 320-2012. Standard for performance-rated cross-laminated timber. Washington (DC): American National Standards Institute; 2019.
50. 10.1201/9781315641645-28510.1201/9781315641645-285 ↗
51. Diebold R, Schleifer A, Glos P. Machine grading of structural sawn timber from various softwood and hardwood species. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood; Sopron, Hungary. University of Wester Hungary; 2000. p. 139–146.
52. Hanhijärvi A Ranta-Maunus A. Development of strength grading of timber using combined measurement techniques. Report of the Combigrade project-phase 2. 2008.