Optimizing the performance of machine learning algorithms for the condition assessment of utility timber poles
Source abstract
Abstract
This study focuses on evaluating several machine learning algorithms for the condition assessment of utility timber poles. An efficient feature extraction technique combining Hilbert Huang transform (HHT) and wavelet packet transform (WPT) is adopted from the authors’ previous work and implemented to determine damage-sensitive features from vibration data related to five serviceable and eight unserviceable in-situ timber poles. Then, these features are pre-processed using correlation heat map analysis for feature selection. Principal component analysis (PCA) is adopted as the final step of pre-processing for reducing noise interference and enhancing classification accuracy. Afterwards, a feature matrix is formed, which is fed into the selected classifiers for pattern recognition. In addition, the information gain method is also implemented and compared against PCA to examine the effect of feature selection. Finally, selected classifiers are employed using those dominant features, and their performance is evaluated based on six parameters – accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, confusion matrix and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. It was found that choosing the best feature set related to the health state helps to improve the performance of the pattern recognition algorithms to a great extent.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wood Treatment and Properties · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Tree Root and Stability Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Engineering, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia
School of IT, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia
School of Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology (CUET), Chittagong, Bangladesh
Funding
AusNet Services
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.10710.1016/j.rser.2016.09.107 ↗
2. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.270-273.152110.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.270-273.1521 ↗
3. Tanasoiu V, Miclea C, Tanasoiu C. Nondestructive testing techniques and piezoelectric ultrasonics transducers for wood and built in wooden structures. J Optoelectron Adv Mater. 2002;4(4):949–957.
4. 10.1002/978111844311810.1002/9781118443118 ↗
5. 10.3390/app1107297410.3390/app11072974 ↗
6. 10.1016/0305-0483(95)00036-410.1016/0305-0483(95)00036-4 ↗
7. 10.1006/mssp.2001.146210.1006/mssp.2001.1462 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.04210.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.042 ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000253510.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002535 ↗
10. 10.1155/2018/675245610.1155/2018/6752456 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.000056310.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000563 ↗
12. 10.1177/147592171879862210.1177/1475921718798622 ↗
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.000101910.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001019 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10921-021-00821-610.1007/s10921-021-00821-6 ↗
15. 10.1142/S021945542042002X10.1142/S021945542042002X ↗
16. Gong Y, Cao B, Zhang H, et al. Terahertz based thickness measurement of thermal barrier coatings using hybrid machine learning. Case Stud NondestrTest Eval. 2023;1–17.
17. 10.1002/978111854838710.1002/9781118548387 ↗
18. 10.1080/0020772005019777610.1080/00207720050197776 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.culher.2020.09.00510.1016/j.culher.2020.09.005 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jweia.2017.10.02210.1016/j.jweia.2017.10.022 ↗
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000253510.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002535 ↗
22. 10.1109/72.91451710.1109/72.914517 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.06.01610.1016/j.measurement.2012.06.016 ↗