journal article·2022-01-02

Experimental investigation on bend-region crack detection using TE11 mode microwaves

Guanren Chen, Takuya Katagiri, Noritaka Yusa, Hidetoshi Hashizume

Publisher page

Abstract

This study experimentally investigates the efficacy of TE11 mode microwaves in detecting bend-region cracks. Three types of bends with different dimensions were deployed in a 3 m piping system and then tested, with an axial or circumferential slit machined at different angular positions to simulate a crack. The TE11 mode microwaves were excited using self-designed TE11 mode microwave probes and utilised for crack detection. The experimental results show clear reflection peaks at the bend position, demonstrating the feasibility of applying TE11 mode microwaves in the detection of bend-region cracks. Furthermore, the peak location of reflection is in accordance with the angular position of the slit. The findings also indicate that the peak amplitude of reflection is affected by the factors of mode conversion of microwaves at a bend. In addition, the experimental results also manifest an excellent signal-to-noise ratio to both two types of slits, suggesting that the microwave NDT is a powerful tool for bend-region inspection.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Microwave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Quantum Science and Energy Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/978111901921310.1002/9781119019213 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.measurement.2017.07.05810.1016/j.measurement.2017.07.058 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.05.03210.1016/j.measurement.2012.05.032 ↗
4. Sugawara K · JSAEM Stud Appl Electromagn Mech · 2001 · 10 · 313
5. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2010.10.00110.1016/j.ndteint.2010.10.001 ↗
6. 10.2320/matertrans.M201700810.2320/matertrans.M2017008 ↗
7. 10.3233/JAE-17114410.3233/JAE-171144 ↗
8. 10.1115/1.278910710.1115/1.2789107 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ultras.2004.02.01310.1016/j.ultras.2004.02.013 ↗
10. 10.1784/insi.2009.51.7.37310.1784/insi.2009.51.7.373 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.08.02110.1016/j.measurement.2018.08.021 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0041-624X(01)00064-610.1016/S0041-624X(01)00064-6 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jsv.2015.02.03610.1016/j.jsv.2015.02.036 ↗
14. 10.3233/JAE-17100110.3233/JAE-171001 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.10220810.1016/j.ndteint.2019.102208 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.137375610.1063/1.1373756 ↗
17. 10.1115/1.199021010.1115/1.1990210 ↗
18. 10.1115/1.199021110.1115/1.1990211 ↗
19. 10.7567/JJAP.50.04660110.7567/JJAP.50.046601 ↗
20. 10.1121/1.479034910.1121/1.4790349 ↗
21. 10.1143/JJAP.49.11660210.1143/JJAP.49.116602 ↗
22. 10.1115/1.403154710.1115/1.4031547 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.02.02610.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.02.026 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.09.00710.1016/j.ndteint.2017.09.007 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2009.07.00610.1016/j.ijpvp.2009.07.006 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.10212510.1016/j.ndteint.2019.102125 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2014.12.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2014.12.004 ↗
28. 10.1109/22.56663810.1109/22.566638 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.12.00510.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.12.005 ↗
30. 10.1115/1.400106110.1115/1.4001061 ↗
31. Ishimoto J · Prog Nucl Energ · 2011 · 2 · 498
32. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.01.00510.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.01.005 ↗
33. 10.1109/MMM.2008.91992510.1109/MMM.2008.919925 ↗
34. 10.1080/10589759.2011.63360810.1080/10589759.2011.633608 ↗
35. Katagiri T · Trans JSME · 2018 · 84 · 17