A novel metering system consists of capacitance-based sensor, gamma-ray sensor and ANN for measuring volume fractions of three-phase homogeneous flows
Source abstract
Abstract
Measuring the volume fraction of different types of fluids with two or three phases is so vital. Among all available methods, two of them, capacitance-based and gamma-ray attenuation, are so popular and widely used. Moreover, nowadays, AI which stands for Artificial Intelligence can be seen almost in all areas, and the measuring section is no exception. In this paper, the main goal is to predict the volume fraction of a three-phase homogeneous fluid which contains water, oil, and gas materials. To opt for an optimised method, a combination of capacitance-based sensors, gamma-ray attenuation sensor and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) is utilised. To train the proposed metering system which is a MLP type, two inputs are considered. For the first input, the concave sensor is simulated in COMSOL Multiphysics software and different combinations of three phases (different volume fractions) are applied. Then through theoretical investigations of gamma-ray sensor, Barium-133 which radiates 0.356 MeV is used. This way, the second required input is generated. Finally, to implement a new and accurate metering system, a number of networks with different characteristics are run in the MATLAB software. The best structure had a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) equal to 0.33, 3.68 and 3.75 for the water, gas and oil phases, respectively. The accuracy of the presented metering system is illustrated by the received outcomes. The novelty of this study is proposing a new combined method that can measure a three-phase homogeneous fluid’s volume fractions containing water, gas and oil, precisely.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Flow Measurement and Analysis · Fluid Dynamics and Mixing · Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Kermanshah University of Technology
Australian University
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia Named After Patrice Lumumba
Sergo Ordzhonikidze Russian State University for Geological Prospecting
Ajman University
University of Southampton
Universidad de la Costa
Funding
Ajman University Internal Research Grant · the RUDN University Scientific Projects · this article are solely the author(s) responsibility
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/0957-0233/8/7/00110.1088/0957-0233/8/7/001 ↗
2. 10.2118/18219-MS10.2118/18219-MS ↗
3. Taherian MR Habashy TM. Microwave device and method for measuring multiphase flow. US Patent No.5 485 743 1996.
4. 10.1088/0957-0233/24/1/01200310.1088/0957-0233/24/1/012003 ↗
5. 10.1080/10589759.2023.230149210.1080/10589759.2023.2301492 ↗
6. 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.328175410.1109/ACCESS.2023.3281754 ↗
7. 10.3390/s2315695910.3390/s23156959 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2023.10240610.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2023.102406 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.08.02710.1016/j.apradiso.2017.08.027 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2020.10955210.1016/j.apradiso.2020.109552 ↗
11. 10.3390/fractalfract704028310.3390/fractalfract7040283 ↗
12. 10.1140/epjp/i2017-11766-310.1140/epjp/i2017-11766-3 ↗
13. 10.3390/sym1304061310.3390/sym13040613 ↗
14. 10.1007/978-1-4471-4060-3_210.1007/978-1-4471-4060-3_2 ↗
15. Hammer EA. Advanced experimental techniques In Crowe, C. T., editor. Multi-phase flow handbook. Boca Raton (FL) (USA): CRC Press; 2006.
16. 10.1109/JSEN.2021.312462510.1109/JSEN.2021.3124625 ↗
17. 10.1145/268437.26844010.1145/268437.268440 ↗
18. Pennec F Achkar H Peyrou D et al. Verification of contact modeling with COMSOL multiphysics software. 2007.
19. 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2017.04.00810.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2017.04.008 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2016.10.02910.1016/j.expthermflusci.2016.10.029 ↗
21. 10.3390/fractalfract702017910.3390/fractalfract7020179 ↗
22. Falcone G. Key multiphase flow metering techniques. Devel Pet Sci. 2009;54:47–190.
23. 10.1631/jzus.2005.A140510.1631/jzus.2005.A1405 ↗
24. https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/Xcom/html/xcom1.html
25. Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A. Deep learning. United States: MIT press; 2016 Nov 10.
26. 10.1038/nature1453910.1038/nature14539 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ins.2016.01.03910.1016/j.ins.2016.01.039 ↗
28. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2012;25:1–9.
29. 10.1109/MSP.2012.220559710.1109/MSP.2012.2205597 ↗
30. Dean J, Corrado G, Monga R, et al. Large scale distributed deep networks. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2012;25:1–11.
31. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.9010.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
32. Bishop CM, Nasrabadi NM. Pattern recognition and machine learning. (NY): Springer; 2006 Aug 17.
33. 10.1162/neco.1992.4.1.110.1162/neco.1992.4.1.1 ↗
34. 10.1109/JSEN.2022.321046710.1109/JSEN.2022.3210467 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2018.02.01710.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2018.02.017 ↗
36. Gurney K. An introduction to neural networks. London: Taylor & Francis e-Library; 2004.
37. 10.3390/pr1103094010.3390/pr11030940 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12916510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129165 ↗
39. 10.1111/ffe.1403210.1111/ffe.14032 ↗
40. 10.1090/qam/1066610.1090/qam/10666 ↗
41. 10.1137/011103010.1137/0111030 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2016.08.00110.1016/j.apradiso.2016.08.001 ↗
43. 10.7717/peerj-cs.62310.7717/peerj-cs.623 ↗
44. 10.3390/math917209110.3390/math9172091 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10842710.1016/j.measurement.2020.108427 ↗
46. 10.1371/journal.pone.030143710.1371/journal.pone.0301437 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2016.10.00110.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2016.10.001 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.09.01710.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.09.017 ↗