A simplified modal-based method to quantify delamination in carbon fibre-reinforced plastic beam
Source abstract
Abstract
This study contributes to our knowledge about the detection and recognition of carbon fibre-reinforced plastic (CFRP) composites by using a modal analysis technique. Delamination was artificially induced during the manufacturing process of CFRP beams so that the dimension and location of the artificial delamination were known. The first three longitudinal bending modes were considered for detecting, locating, and evaluating the delamination. Contrary to what is commonly practised, the sensor placed on the CFRP structure had a large mass in order to contribute actively to restricting the delamination and hence modifying the structure’s natural frequencies, thus making it much easier to monitor its health condition. The technique was implemented on a beam with a delamination gap of 9% of the beam’s length, positioned within the span of the beam. The results demonstrate that the proposed technique can be effective not only to locate the delamination but also to measure its extent accurately.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Smart Materials for Construction · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, Doha, Qatar
Funding
no
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1142/S021945541440022710.1142/S0219455414400227 ↗
2. 10.1006/jsvi.1999.262410.1006/jsvi.1999.2624 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.08010.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.080 ↗
4. 10.1784/insi.2009.51.9.47710.1784/insi.2009.51.9.477 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.002 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.19710.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.197 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.05.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2004.05.018 ↗
8. 10.1016/0045-7949(95)00290-110.1016/0045-7949(95)00290-1 ↗
9. 10.1115/1.237514110.1115/1.2375141 ↗
10. 10.1177/058310240606589810.1177/0583102406065898 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.01.00410.1016/j.ymssp.2014.01.004 ↗
12. 10.1007/978-81-322-2187-6_20410.1007/978-81-322-2187-6_204 ↗
13. 10.1006/jsvi.1997.130810.1006/jsvi.1997.1308 ↗
14. 10.1088/0964-1726/5/3/01210.1088/0964-1726/5/3/012 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.04.00810.1016/j.matdes.2004.04.008 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0141-0296(96)00149-610.1016/S0141-0296(96)00149-6 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jsv.2009.03.04010.1016/j.jsv.2009.03.040 ↗
18. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.167-168.13210.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.167-168.132 ↗
19. Wenguang L · Shock Vib · 2018 · 12 · 2018
20. Actis R · Am Soc Mech Eng Des Eng Div · 1989 · 18 · 99
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:7(677)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:7(677) ↗
22. Nichols JM · J Sound Vib · 2009 · 322 · 43810.1016/j.jsv.2008.11.025 ↗
23. 10.1177/073168441770348910.1177/0731684417703489 ↗
24. 10.3390/vibration101001110.3390/vibration1010011 ↗
25. 10.1006/jsvi.1995.001510.1006/jsvi.1995.0015 ↗