A hybrid approach for nondestructive assessment and design optimisation and testing of in-service machinery
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Complex rotating machinery requires regular condition monitoring inspections to assess their running conditions and their structural integrity to prevent catastrophic failures. Machine failures can be divided into two categories. First is the wear and tear during operation, they range from bearing defects, gear damage, misalignment, imbalance or mechanical looseness, for which simple condition-based maintenance techniques can easily detect the root cause and trigger remedial action process. The second factor in machine failure is caused by the inherent design faults that usually happened due to many reasons such as improper installation, poor servicing, bad workmanship and structural dynamics design deficiency. In fact, individual machines components are generally dynamically well designed and rigorously tested. However, when these machines are assembled on sight and linked together, their dynamic characteristics will change causing unexpected behaviour of the system. Since nondestructive evaluation provides an excellent alternative to the classical monitoring and proved attractive due to the possibility of performing reliable assessments of all types of machinery, the novel dynamic design verification procedure – based on the combination of in-service operation deflection shape measurement, experimental modal analysis and iterative inverse finite element analysis – proposed here allows quick identification of structural weakness, and helps to provide and verify the solutions. Keywords: modal analysisODSFEMDDVdesignvertical pump
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems · Advanced Sensor Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1098/rsta.2000.071410.1098/rsta.2000.0714 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.10.01810.1016/j.ymssp.2009.10.018 ↗
3. 10.2172/24929910.2172/249299 ↗
4. Dossing, O. and Staker, C.H. 1987.Operational deflection shapes: background, measurement and applications, 1372–1378. London: Proceedings of the 5th International Modal Analysis Conference.
5. Ewins D.J. · 2000
6. 10.1080/1058975050020963810.1080/10589750500209638 ↗
7. 10.1006/mssp.1998.121110.1006/mssp.1998.1211 ↗
8. 10.1080/1058975050014914910.1080/10589750500149149 ↗
9. James G.H. · J. Anal. Exp. Modal Anal. · 1995 · 10 · 260
10. 10.1080/10589759.2010.48961010.1080/10589759.2010.489610 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2008.10.00210.1016/j.ymssp.2008.10.002 ↗
12. Di Maio D. · Proc. SPIE. · 2006 · 6345 · 1
13. Marscher, W.D. and Jen, C.W. 1999.Use of operating detection and mode shapes for machinery diagnostics, 65–71. Kissimmee, FL: Proceedings of 17th International Modal Analysis Conference.
14. McHargue, P.L. and Richardson, M.H. 1993.Operating detection shapes from time versus frequency domain measurements, 581–587. Kissimmee, FL: Proceedings of the 11th International Modal Analysis Conference.
15. 10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00274-210.1016/S0020-7683(00)00274-2 ↗
16. Pascual, R., Golinval, J.C. and Razeto, M. 1999.On-line damage assessment using operating detection shapes, 238–243. Kissimmee, FL: Proceedings of 17th International Modal Analysis Conference.
17. 10.1016/j.measurement.2010.09.00510.1016/j.measurement.2010.09.005 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.measurement.2011.08.00310.1016/j.measurement.2011.08.003 ↗
19. Rao S.S. · 2005
20. Noroozi, S., Dupac, M. and Rahman, A.G.A. 2012.Dynamic design verification (DDV) of vertical pump using, combined modal analysis (MA), finite element analysis (FEA) & operation deflection shape (ODS), 18–23. Athens, Greece: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Vouliagmeni Beach. March 7–9
21. Swanson E. · J Sound Vib. · 2005 · 39 · 10
22. Tongue B.H. · 2002
23. Vold, H., Schwarz, B. and Richardson, M. 2000.Measuring operating deflection shapes under non-stationary conditions, Vol. 2, 1655–1660. San Antonio, TX: Proceedings of the International Modal Analysis Conference – IMAC.
24. 10.1016/S0168-874X(01)00061-010.1016/S0168-874X(01)00061-0 ↗
25. 10.1080/1058975090347361710.1080/10589750903473617 ↗
26. R.J. Jenneskens, Operational deflection shape analysis and vibration solving for a motion simulator, Tech. Rep., University of Eindhoven, DCT 2006.135 (206), pp. 1–49
27. LMS International, Tutorial: Operational deflection shape analysis, 2005
28. Schwarz, B. and Richardson, M. 2001.Measurements required for displaying operating deflection shapes, 1–6. Proceedings of the International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC XXII). February 5–8
29. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.11.01510.1016/j.ymssp.2005.11.015 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.11.00910.1016/j.ymssp.2005.11.009 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.measurement.2003.04.00110.1016/j.measurement.2003.04.001 ↗
32. Hassoun M.H. · 1995
33. Nedjah N. · 2010
34. 10.1002/978047043469710.1002/9780470434697 ↗