Micro-indentation analysis of aluminium alloys: simultaneous evaluation of tensile properties and hardness characterisation via Knoop indentation
Source abstract
Abstract
Nondestructive evaluation of mechanical properties and hardness for aluminum alloys is essential for ensuring structural integrity during service. This study establishes a quantitative relationship between the loading coefficient, unloading work, and elastoplastic constitutive behavior of aluminum alloys using Knoop micro-indentation data and dimensional analysis. Systematic calibration via finite element analysis (FEA) yielded a mechanical model defined by only eight parameters, enabling simultaneous determination of tensile stress-strain behavior, Knoop hardness (HK), and ultimate tensile strength from indentation measurements. Validation included forward/inverse analyses of 40 simulated scenarios and experimental tests on four aluminum alloys (6061-T651, 7075-T651, 2024-T4, 5052-H32). Results showed strong agreement between predictions and experimental data, with maximum relative deviations below 2% for HK and under 10% for tensile strength. The model provides an accurate, efficient nondestructive method for assessing aluminum alloy properties, supporting in-service structural evaluation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
China Construction Buer Curtain Wall & Decoration Co., Ltd
GuangXi University
Changsha University of Science & Technology
Beijing Luqiaotong International Engineering Consulting & Project Management Co., LTD
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.2174/187414010070101006010.2174/1874140100701010060 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jmps.2022.10486010.1016/j.jmps.2022.104860 ↗
3. Ming L, Dongyang H, Chenghui G. Study on fracture toughness of semiconductor material using Vickers and Berkovich indenters. Chin J Theor Appl Mech. 2021;53(2):413–423.
4. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.06.01710.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.06.017 ↗
5. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10465210.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104652 ↗
7. 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.71.0210.3221/IGF-ESIS.71.02 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2023.10494210.1016/j.ijpvp.2023.104942 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.15610.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.156 ↗
10. 10.18485/aeletters.2018.3.2.210.18485/aeletters.2018.3.2.2 ↗
11. 10.3390/ma1817415910.3390/ma18174159 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.10857010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108570 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.11061610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.110616 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.05.08910.1016/j.msea.2018.05.089 ↗
15. 10.1073/pnas.192221011710.1073/pnas.1922210117 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10338-023-00382-310.1007/s10338-023-00382-3 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2025.10559810.1016/j.euromechsol.2025.105598 ↗
18. 10.1093/oso/9780198507765.001.000110.1093/oso/9780198507765.001.0001 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.mser.2004.05.00110.1016/j.mser.2004.05.001 ↗
20. Johnson KL. Contact mechanics[M]. Cambridge university press; 1987.
21. 10.1016/j.apm.2017.07.04210.1016/j.apm.2017.07.042 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apm.2018.11.02410.1016/j.apm.2018.11.024 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.04.00910.1016/j.tafmec.2019.04.009 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmps.2024.10555710.1016/j.jmps.2024.105557 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.10340310.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103403 ↗
26. 10.1520/JTE2017073010.1520/JTE20170730 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.measen.2024.10145310.1016/j.measen.2024.101453 ↗
28. 10.1007/s11998-024-01019-x10.1007/s11998-024-01019-x ↗
29. 10.1177/0022034561040006040110.1177/00220345610400060401 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2017.03.00910.1016/j.mechmat.2017.03.009 ↗
31. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00568-210.1016/S1359-6454(02)00568-2 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.04.01010.1016/j.mechmat.2019.04.010 ↗
33. 10.1080/10589759.2024.231521010.1080/10589759.2024.2315210 ↗
34. 10.1007/s12540-015-5176-110.1007/s12540-015-5176-1 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.11910.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.119 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.12511010.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.125110 ↗
37. Alsoufi MS, Alhazmi MW, Ghulman HA, et al. Surface roughness and Knoop indentation micro-hardness behavior of aluminium oxide (Al2O3) and polystyrene (C8H8) n materials. Int J Mech Mechatron Eng. 2016;16(6):43–49.
38. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.07.01410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.07.014 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.05.03910.1016/j.ceramint.2020.05.039 ↗
40. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00245-210.1016/S1359-6454(01)00245-2 ↗
41. Zhang XB, Shang PJ. Study on influence of strain hardening exponent on yield strength and tensile strength. Mech Engineer. 2017;5:106–109 1002－2333（2017）05－0102－04 .
42. ISO 6892–1:2019. Metallic materials — tensile testing — part 1: method of test at room temperature [S]. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 2019.
43. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.06.01810.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.06.018 ↗
44. ISO 6507–1:2018. Metallic materials — Vickers hardness test — part 1: test method [s]. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 2018.
45. ASTM E92-17. Standard test methods for Vickers hardness and Knoop hardness of metallic materials. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2017.