High frequency ultrasonics for precursor damage assessments in CFRP composite structures
Source abstract
Abstract
Accurate detection of early-stage fatigue damage in composite materials is essential for structural integrity assessment yet remains challenging due to microscale damage initiation. While guided wave ultrasonics has been widely employed, its sensitivity at low damage levels is limited. This study presents an alternative approach based on high-frequency P-waves (> 10 MHz) to characterise early-stage damage in Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) composites. Using high frequency P-waves along the thickness direction, nonlinear ultrasonic parameters and sideband peak modulation are evaluated in CFRP specimens at ~20% of fatigue life. Specimens are subjected to tensile–tensile fatigue loading four-layer woven CFRP composite, with three damage induction stages separated by 8-hour relaxation periods to simulate fatigue evolution. The results show that nonlinear features in P-wave are sensitive to microstructural changes such as matrix cracking, fibre breakage, and edge delamination. Notably, sideband peak analysis showed higher sensitivity in detecting early-stage damage and outperformed conventional harmonic indicators in capturing subtle changes in material states. Ultrasonic assessments are validated using residual strengths, confirming high-frequency P-waves as reliable indicators of precursor damage in CFRP composites. These findings demonstrate the potential of P-wave – based nonlinear ultrasonics as a viable alternative to guided wave for early-stage damage evaluation in composites.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Engineering and Materials Science Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Georgia Southern University
University of South Carolina
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s00170-014-6022-110.1007/s00170-014-6022-1 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ast.2018.06.02010.1016/j.ast.2018.06.020 ↗
3. Othman R, Ismail NI, Pahmi MA, et al. Application of carbon fiber reinforced plastics in automotive industry: a review. J Mech Manuf. 2018;1:144–154.
4. Ahmad H, Markina AA, Porotnikov MV, et al. A review of carbon fiber materials in automotive industry. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. vol. 971. IOP Publishing; 2020. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/971/3/03201
5. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.02510.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.025 ↗
6. 10.1007/s41062-020-00417-510.1007/s41062-020-00417-5 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.09.02310.1016/j.compositesa.2018.09.023 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.13110.1016/j.procir.2013.06.131 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10875710.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108757 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11347510.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113475 ↗
11. Hossen MR, Ahmed H, Sadaf AI, et al. Development of a non-destructive ultrasonic technique for in-situ battery health monitoring. In: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2023. doi: 10.1115/IMECE2023-113961
12. 10.1117/12.200984510.1117/12.2009845 ↗
13. 10.1533/9780857093554.2.23810.1533/9780857093554.2.238 ↗
14. Hall AJ, Brennan IV, Raymond E, et al. Damage precursor investigation of fiber-reinforced composite materials under fatigue loads. Aberdeen (MD), USA: US Army Research Laboratory; 2013.
15. 10.1177/072551361455473210.1177/0725513614554732 ↗
16. 10.1115/1.406570710.1115/1.4065707 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.243146710.1063/1.2431467 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.09.00610.1016/j.ymssp.2007.09.006 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.271433310.1063/1.2714333 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.349180110.1063/1.3491801 ↗
21. 10.1117/12.251478610.1117/12.2514786 ↗
22. 10.1088/1361-665X/aadd2d10.1088/1361-665X/aadd2d ↗
23. 10.1177/1045389X1350057210.1177/1045389X13500572 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ultras.2017.12.01110.1016/j.ultras.2017.12.011 ↗
25. 10.1088/0964-1726/21/8/08501910.1088/0964-1726/21/8/085019 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ultras.2022.10685810.1016/j.ultras.2022.106858 ↗
27. Kundu T, Eiras JN, Li W, et al. Fundamentals of nonlinear acoustical techniques and sideband peak count. In: Kundu T, editor. Nonlinear ultrasonic and vibro-acoustical techniques for nondestructive evaluation. Springer Cham; 2019. p. 1–88.10.1007/978-3-319-94476-0 ↗
28. 10.1177/1045389X1454987010.1177/1045389X14549870 ↗
29. 10.3390/ma1012144410.3390/ma10121444 ↗
30. 10.3390/ma1012143610.3390/ma10121436 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ultras.2019.01.00210.1016/j.ultras.2019.01.002 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41598-025-98774-710.1038/s41598-025-98774-7 ↗
33. 10.3390/ma1220338310.3390/ma12203383 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.01610.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.016 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10681110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106811 ↗
36. 10.1111/ffe.1419910.1111/ffe.14199 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11660410.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116604 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10665910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106659 ↗
39. 10.1117/12.252208410.1117/12.2522084 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.04810.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.048 ↗
41. 10.1002/wics.19910.1002/wics.199 ↗
42. Ellwood R. The effect of microstructure and fatigue on the acoustoelastic response of aerospace materials. University of Nottingham 2012.
43. 10.1063/1.508395710.1063/1.5083957 ↗
44. Landau LD, Pitaevskii LP, Kosevich AM, et al. Theory of elasticity: volume 7. Vol. 7. Elsevier; 2012.
45. 10.1016/j.ultras.2021.10667010.1016/j.ultras.2021.106670 ↗
46. 10.1121/2.000168110.1121/2.0001681 ↗
47. 10.1063/1.496382910.1063/1.4963829 ↗
48. 10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00124-910.1016/S1359-835X(98)00124-9 ↗
49. Bocchieri RT. Time-dependent deformation of a nonlinear viscoelastic rubber-toughened fiber composite with growing damage. The University of Texas at Austin; 2001.
50. Gandhi N. Determination of dispersion curves for acoustoelastic Lamb wave propagation. Georgia Institute of Technology; 2010.
51. Gandhi N, Michaels JE, Lee SJ. Acoustoelastic Lamb wave propagation in a homogeneous, isotropic aluminum plate. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, San Diego, California, USA. American Institute of Physics; 2011.