Conductivity measurement of metal tube based on high-frequency eddy current method
Source abstract
Abstract
Metal materials, particularly metal tubes, are essential in industries, such as aerospace, nuclear power, and oil and gas. Ensuring their safety and integrity is critical, with conductivity being a key parameter related to hardness and material defect detection. Eddy current testing (ECT) is widely used for this purpose due to its high speed and non-contact nature. In this paper, high-precision measurement of metal tube conductivity is achieved using high-frequency single-frequency signals. Starting from the classical Dodd-Deeds solution, Bessel functions and the skin effect in eddy currents are leveraged for the approximation, leading to a simplified conductivity calculation formula. At high frequencies (on the order of MHz), the real part of the coil impedance is inversely proportional to the square root of the tube conductivity. Additionally, the influence of both metallic tube and coil parameters on the proposed method is also investigated. Experimental validations are carried out to confirm the accuracy of the simplified formula and conductivity measurement. Results indicate the proposed conductivity measurement method significantly improves measurement speed while maintaining accuracy, with less than 1.75% relative error.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Beihang University
Tsinghua University
The Silesian University of Technology
Aviation Industry Corporation of China Beijing Precision Engineering Institute for Aircraft Industry
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Hangzhou International Innovation Institute · Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TIM.2025.354549410.1109/TIM.2025.3545494 ↗
2. 10.1023/A:102266402944710.1023/A:1022664029447 ↗
3. 10.3390/s1703057910.3390/s17030579 ↗
4. 10.1109/JSEN.2025.357975410.1109/JSEN.2025.3579754 ↗
5. 10.1109/TIM.2017.266984310.1109/TIM.2017.2669843 ↗
6. 10.1088/1361-6420/aa909a10.1088/1361-6420/aa909a ↗
7. 10.3390/s11030252510.3390/s110302525 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.165668010.1063/1.1656680 ↗
9. 10.1109/TIM.1978.431467110.1109/TIM.1978.4314671 ↗
10. 10.3233/JAE-2007-86910.3233/JAE-2007-869 ↗
11. 10.3233/JAE-2004-56410.3233/JAE-2004-564 ↗
12. She S, Zheng X, Guo R, et al. Simplified analytical model for pulsed eddy current testing of asymmetric cylinders and tubes with physics-guided multi-scale ResNet for property estimation. SSRN Electron J. 2024, Art. no. 5155433.
13. Xin W Lei Y. Analysis of a pulsed eddy current testing method for ferromagnetic pipeline wall thickness determination considering minor hysteresis. In: Chen Z Xie S Li Y editors. Electromagnetic nondestructive evaluation (XVIII). Amsterdam Netherlands: IOS Press; 2015. p. 117–124.10.3233/978-1-61499-509-8-117 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.17086710.1016/j.jmmm.2023.170867 ↗
15. 10.3390/s1809276910.3390/s18092769 ↗
16. 10.1109/TIM.2020.300511410.1109/TIM.2020.3005114 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.11328510.1016/j.measurement.2023.113285 ↗
18. 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.336680010.1109/ACCESS.2024.3366800 ↗
19. 10.1109/TIM.2005.86124410.1109/TIM.2005.861244 ↗
20. Xia Z, Yan J, Huang R, et al. Fast estimation of metallic pipe properties using simplified analytical solution in eddy-current testing. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2022;72:1–13.10.1109/TIM.2022.3224516 ↗
21. Huang P Guo J Bao Z. A novel measurement method of conductivity and radius for non-magnetic metallic rod. IEEE Sens J. 2025;25(4):6723–6731.10.1109/JSEN.2024.3520427 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.11349610.1016/j.measurement.2023.113496 ↗
23. Huang P Xu H Feng J et al. Simultaneous measurement of conductivity and diameter of an infinite length metallic rod using the phase signature of induced eddy current. IEEE Sens J. 2024;24(16):25891–25899.10.1109/JSEN.2024.3409023 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.02.00610.1016/j.ndteint.2012.02.006 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2015.04.00110.1016/j.ndteint.2015.04.001 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.02.01010.1016/j.ndteint.2016.02.010 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.114831910.1063/1.1148319 ↗
28. 10.1109/TIM.2023.325903710.1109/TIM.2023.3259037 ↗