A pseudo-3D computational approach for ultrasonic inspection of thin composite laminates with delamination emanating from a countersunk hole
Source abstract
Abstract
The work presented in this article focused on the development of a pseudo-3D computational approach for visualizing computational ultrasonic inspection models for thin composite laminates with complex geometry. The approach creates a 3D dataset by merging several 2D models along different cross-sectional slices of the material under inspection. The approach was applied to a 2.6 mm thick carbon fiber epoxy laminate with an annulus-shaped artificial defect concentric with a 4 mm diameter through hole, shadowed by a 100° countersink. Investigations were performed using water immersion ultrasonic pulse-echo and single-sided pitch-catch setups operating at a 5 MHz frequency. Time-of-flight comparisons between computational and experimental A-scans validated the computational results, demonstrating a calibration error of 4%. Defect sizes measured in the C-scans of the computational model matched the actual outer diameter and width of the annulus, with a difference of 18% and 6%, respectively. Findings within the experimental dataset were similar, with the largest difference associated with the defect width being off by 0.088 mm. The pseudo-3D approach revealed that a normal incidence water immersion setup was ineffective in detecting defects from the countersunk geometry, while an oblique incidence inspection at 8.4375° was successful in capturing the defect with reasonable accuracy.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Optical measurement and interference techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Clarkson University
TRI Austin Inc
Funding
Air Force Research Laboratory · Office of Naval Research
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/978047061224810.1002/9780470612248 ↗
2. 10.3390/ma1417481210.3390/ma14174812 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.06.11210.1016/j.ceramint.2019.06.112 ↗
4. 10.1155/2018/506194810.1155/2018/5061948 ↗
5. Ngo M. Investigation of delamination initiation and propagation in the vicinity of fastener locations in primary composite structures [dissertation]. San Diego (CA): University of California San Diego; 2019.
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11631610.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116316 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.10783010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107830 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11111010.1016/j.compositesb.2023.111110 ↗
9. 10.1007/s00170-020-05310-010.1007/s00170-020-05310-0 ↗
10. nasa.gov [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jun 17]. Available from: https://llis.nasa.gov/lesson/765
11. 10.3389/fmats.2022.98664510.3389/fmats.2022.986645 ↗
12. Blitz J, Simpson G. Ultrasonic methods of non-destructive testing. London (UK): Springer; 1996.
13. Dominguez N, Ithurralde G, Reverdy F. Advanced ultrasonic 2D phased-array probes. In: Proceedings of the 18th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing; Durban, South Africa; 2012 Apr 16–20. NDT.net.
14. 10.1016/j.cja.2019.09.01710.1016/j.cja.2019.09.017 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11755410.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117554 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10875510.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108755 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ultras.2021.10665710.1016/j.ultras.2021.106657 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.494049910.1063/1.4940499 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10801610.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108016 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ultras.2022.10671610.1016/j.ultras.2022.106716 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.04.02410.1016/j.compositesb.2014.04.024 ↗
22. 10.3390/s2002055910.3390/s20020559 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2020.10010410.1016/j.jcomc.2020.100104 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ultras.2017.11.00210.1016/j.ultras.2017.11.002 ↗
25. 10.5772/2995410.5772/29954 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.10.01710.1016/j.jcp.2013.10.017 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2024.10736910.1016/j.compstruc.2024.107369 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cma.2023.11671810.1016/j.cma.2023.116718 ↗
29. 10.3390/app803045010.3390/app8030450 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.03.02210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.03.022 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.meafoo.2022.10002710.1016/j.meafoo.2022.100027 ↗
32. 10.1109/AT-EQUAL.2009.2910.1109/AT-EQUAL.2009.29 ↗
33. DA4518U [Internet]. Plainfield (CT). [cited 2023 Feb 13]. Available from: https://prepregs.com/da-4518u/
34. Abaqus - SIMULIA User Assistance [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jun 15]. Available from: https://help.3ds.com
35. 10.1177/030932472092458010.1177/0309324720924580 ↗
36. 10.1080/00218464.2019.159886210.1080/00218464.2019.1598862 ↗
37. DuPont™ Kapton® 500VN polyimide film 125 micron thickness [Internet]. [cited 2023 Apr 1]. Available from: https://www.matweb.com/search/datasheet_print.aspx?matguid=338573ad1bdf4586aa17fab95f3a57d7
38. DuPont™ Kapton® HN (Polyimide) [Internet]. [cited 2023 Apr 1]. Available from: http://sterlingplasticsinc.com/materials/dupont-kapton-hn-polyimide/
39. 10.1117/12.265728110.1117/12.2657281 ↗
40. 3D slicer image computing platform [Internet]. [cited 2024 Feb 26]. Available from: https://slicer.org/
41. Prisma [Internet]. [cited 2022 Mar 14]. Available from: https://sonatest.com/products/flaw-detectors-phased-array/prisma
42. Utstudio+ [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 21. Available from: https://sonatest.com/products/software/utstudio