An ANN-based instrumented indentation method for evaluating biaxial residual stress in metallic materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Residual stresses in metallic components can significantly impact their mechanical performance. Accurately evaluating biaxial residual stresses is crucial for analysing mechanical behaviour and assessing service safety. This study proposes a novel biaxial residual stress evaluation method that integrates spherical indentation with neural network tools. Dimensional analysis and correlation analysis were first employed to select the optimal analytical parameters (such as the plasticity parameters, the dimensionless loading work, and the ellipticity of the residual imprint) for evaluating biaxial residual stresses. Then, an artificial neural network (ANN) was applied to map the relationships between the analytical parameters and the biaxial residual stresses based on a database constructed by finite element simulations. With these relationships, an ANN-based instrumented indentation method to evaluate biaxial residual stresses was established. Finally, numerical and experimental validations were conducted to ensure the accuracy and reliability of this newly proposed method. The advantage of this method is to measure arbitrary biaxial residual stresses in a non-destructive way without using stress-free specimens which are difficult to obtain in engineering.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Zhejiang University of Technology
Beihang University
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China · Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Zhejiang
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.27110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.271 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10853-014-8792-010.1007/s10853-014-8792-0 ↗
3. 10.1088/0034-4885/70/12/R0410.1088/0034-4885/70/12/R04 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.04.06910.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.04.069 ↗
5. In: Lu J, Ed. Handbook of measurement of residual stresses. Lilburn, GA, USA: Fairmont Press; 1996.
6. 10.1007/s11340-013-9729-210.1007/s11340-013-9729-2 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.02910.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.029 ↗
8. 10.1111/j.1475-1305.1987.tb00640.x10.1111/j.1475-1305.1987.tb00640.x ↗
9. 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.09.53110.1016/j.proeng.2012.09.531 ↗
10. 10.1080/1058975920895274210.1080/10589759208952742 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.10.00210.1016/j.ndteint.2013.10.002 ↗
12. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.494-495.65510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.494-495.655 ↗
13. 10.1080/1058975840895290410.1080/10589758408952904 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.12.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2012.12.004 ↗
15. 10.1080/10589759.2023.219464910.1080/10589759.2023.2194649 ↗
16. 10.1007/s11998-024-01019-x10.1007/s11998-024-01019-x ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2025.11113410.1016/j.compscitech.2025.111134 ↗
18. Peng G, Zhang T. Progress in instrumented indentation methods for determination of surface residual stress. Chin J Theor Appl Mech. 2022;54(8):2287–2303.
19. 10.1007/s11340-024-01119-010.1007/s11340-024-01119-0 ↗
20. 10.1557/JMR.1996.009110.1557/JMR.1996.0091 ↗
21. 10.1557/JMR.1996.009210.1557/JMR.1996.0092 ↗
22. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00226-210.1016/S1359-6454(98)00226-2 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.07.04110.1016/j.msea.2014.07.041 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.36819610.1063/1.368196 ↗
25. 10.1016/S1359-6462(03)00290-210.1016/S1359-6462(03)00290-2 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.00610.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.006 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.02.02110.1016/j.jmrt.2020.02.021 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10771810.1016/j.measurement.2020.107718 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.10.03410.1016/j.msea.2005.10.034 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.07.02410.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.07.024 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.05.00110.1016/j.ijplas.2019.05.001 ↗
32. 10.1002/nme.695710.1002/nme.6957 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.10518610.1016/j.engappai.2022.105186 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11336710.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113367 ↗
35. 10.1520/JTE2013023610.1520/JTE20130236 ↗
36. 10.1520/JTE2017073010.1520/JTE20170730 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.04.01010.1016/j.mechmat.2019.04.010 ↗
38. 10.1115/1.148575610.1115/1.1485756 ↗
39. 10.1557/mrc.2018.24010.1557/mrc.2018.240 ↗
40. 10.3390/met1004044010.3390/met10040440 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2011.09.00910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2011.09.009 ↗
42. 10.1016/0024-3795(82)90229-410.1016/0024-3795(82)90229-4 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10870510.1016/j.matdes.2020.108705 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.01810.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.018 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.08.02010.1016/j.actamat.2005.08.020 ↗
46. 10.1177/1464420723117945410.1177/14644207231179454 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.10.38210.1016/j.ceramint.2024.10.382 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.07.12210.1016/j.jmapro.2024.07.122 ↗