Analysis of acoustic emission signals during bending deformation of magnesium alloy sheet
Source abstract
Abstract
Acoustic emission (AE) refers to an elastic wave occurring during plastic deformation and fracture. In this work, AE techniques were utilised to investigate the characteristics of bending deformation of magnesium alloy sheets (AZ31B). In the experiments, AZ31B sheets with thicknesses of 1 mm and 3 mm were examined. During bending deformation, a significant number of AE signals were generated in the initial stage when plastic deformation. Subsequently, the occurrence of AE signals decreased. The plastic deformation characteristics and the number of AE hit counts were analysed. In the bending process, complete material fracture does not occur instantaneously; instead, cracks propagate progressively as bending advances, generating signals with short durations. AE signals produced at the point of fracture are characterised by short durations. Furthermore, the AE characteristics were analysed based on the presence or absence of lubrication. When proper lubrication was applied, the total hit count of AE signals was significantly reduced. Signals with long durations, low peak amplitudes, and low energy were predominantly minimized. This analysis provided insights into the characteristics of AE signals generated by friction. By examining the AE characteristics during bending deformation, the features of AE signals associated with the bending and fracture of magnesium alloy sheets were identified
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Laser and Thermal Forming Techniques · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Seoul National University of Science and Technology
San Diego State University
Funding
the National Research Foundation of Korea
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.6028/jres.089.00810.6028/jres.089.008 ↗
2. 10.12989/sem.2015.54.6.107510.12989/sem.2015.54.6.1075 ↗
3. 10.1016/0142-1123(86)90055-110.1016/0142-1123(86)90055-1 ↗
4. 10.1179/imtr.1980.25.1.4110.1179/imtr.1980.25.1.41 ↗
5. Huang M, Jiang L, Liaw PK, et al. Using acoustic emission in fatigue and fracture materials research. Jom. 1998;50:1–14.
6. 10.1016/0963-8695(92)90636-U10.1016/0963-8695(92)90636-U ↗
7. Kaphle MR. Analysis of acoustic emission data for accurate damage assessment for structural health monitoring applications. : Queensland University of Technology; 2012 https://eprints.qut.edu.au/53201/.
8. Watson JR, Yuyama S, Pullin R, et al. Acoustic emission monitoring applications for civil structures. In: Bridge management 5 : Inspection, maintenance, assessment and repair. Vol. 5. London, United Kingdom: Thomas Telford Limited 2005. p. 563–570.
9. 10.1016/j.dibe.2023.10029410.1016/j.dibe.2023.100294 ↗
10. 10.1177/147592171984970010.1177/1475921719849700 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00413-110.1016/S0924-0136(00)00413-1 ↗
12. 10.1016/S1359-6462(96)00503-910.1016/S1359-6462(96)00503-9 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00441-610.1016/S0924-0136(00)00441-6 ↗
14. 10.1007/s11740-013-0452-810.1007/s11740-013-0452-8 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.08.00210.1016/j.jmapro.2017.08.002 ↗
16. 10.1007/s00170-021-07770-410.1007/s00170-021-07770-4 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.11775810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117758 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.10942010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.109420 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00760-910.1016/S0924-0136(01)00760-9 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.06610.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.066 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00339-210.1016/S0924-0136(98)00339-2 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11581010.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115810 ↗
23. 10.7736/JKSPE.019.10610.7736/JKSPE.019.106 ↗
24. 10.1007/s12540-024-01771-010.1007/s12540-024-01771-0 ↗
25. 10.1007/978-3-540-69972-910.1007/978-3-540-69972-9 ↗
26. Tensi HM. The Kaiser-effect and its scientific background. J Acoustic Emiss. 2004;22:s1–s16.
27. 10.1016/j.wear.2009.12.01010.1016/j.wear.2009.12.010 ↗