Rapid concrete surface roughness assessment with smartphone LiDAR
Source abstract
Abstract
Concrete surface roughness is integral to interface shear resistance and overall integrity between concrete cast at different times, influencing structure safety. This interface is found at common construction joints that enable composite action between precast and cast-in-place concrete elements or monolith behaviour between two cast-in-place pours. Traditional on-site roughness evaluation relies on qualitative methods, such as visual comparison with predefined surface profiles. These assessment methods are subjective, time-consuming, and inconsistent. The absence of quantitative methods creates a notable gap in the data-to-decision framework. Recent advancements in smartphone LiDAR technology hold potential to provide a solution. Our study introduces a novel method that leverages smartphone LiDAR technology to precisely measure concrete roughness quantitatively. Data is acquired from the LiDAR system in the form of a point cloud, which captures the three-dimensional (3D) structure of the surface. Our study comprises comprehensive laboratory experiments to assess LiDAR operability, followed by on-site experiments for roughness quantification across five sites with varying levels of concrete roughness. The LiDAR data are compared with ground truth 3D data collected using a structured light sensor. The results demonstrate that the proposed method presents a reliable alternative for measuring concrete surface roughness in the field.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Conservation Techniques and Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo
Ministry of Transportation of Ontario (MTO)
Funding
Ontario Ministry of Transportation · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Horgan R. FIU bridge collapse | lessons learnt three years since Florida tragedy. New Civil Engineer. 2021 [cited 2021 Mar 15]. Available from: https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/fiu-bridge-collapse-lessons-learnt-three-years-since-florida-tragedy-15-03-2021/
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.04.02310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.04.023 ↗
3. Mummery L. Surface texture analysis: the handbook. Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany: Hommelwerke GmbH; 1992.
4. National Transportation Safety Board. Pedestrian bridge collapse over SW 8th street Miami Florida March 15 2018. (Highway Accident Report NTSB/HAR-19/02). Washington (DC); 2019. Available from: https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/HAR1902.pdf
5. Canadian Standards Association. Canadian highway bridge design code. 12th ed. Toronto (ON): CSA Group; 2019.
6. Canadian Standards Association. Design of concrete structures (A23.3: 19). Revised June 2019. Toronto (ON): CSA Group; 2019.
7. 10.1080/10589759.2024.233706710.1080/10589759.2024.2337067 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.04510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.045 ↗
9. Lansard M. The best 3D scanners in 2023 for every application. Aniwaa; 2022 [cited 2022 Feb 18]. Available from: https://www.aniwaa.com/buyers-guide/3d-scanners/best-3d-scanner/
10. International Concrete Repair Institute. Selecting and specifying concrete surface preparation for sealers coatings polymer overlays and concrete repair. 2013.
11. 10.1520/D7682-17R2210.1520/D7682-17R22 ↗
12. American Society for Testing and Materials. “Test method for measuring pavement macrotexture depth using a volumetric technique.” ASTM international. “Test method for replication and measurement of concrete surface profiles using replica putty.” ASTM International. 2019.
13. Maerz N Myers JJ. Final technical report: development of a prototype imaging concrete roughness measurement device. 2001. 00–20.
14. 10.1680/macr.2007.0002410.1680/macr.2007.00024 ↗
15. Grzelka M, Majchrowski R, Sadowski L. Investigations of concrete surface roughness by means of 3dDScanner. Prace Instytutu Elektrotechniki. 2011(251):97–108.
16. Stein S. Lidar is one of the iPhone and iPad Pro’s coolest tricks: Here’s what else it can do. CNET. 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 2]. Available from: https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/lidar-is-one-of-the-iphone-ipad-coolest-tricks-its-only-getting-better/
17. Majchrowski R. Spiral sampling in surface topography measurements. Poznań: Poznań Polytechnic; 2008.
18. International Organization for Standardization. Geometrical product specifications (GPS) - surface texture: profile method - terms definitions and surface texture parameters. 1997.
19. International Organization for Standardization. Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — Surface texture: areal — Part 2: terms definitions and surface texture parameters. 2021.
20. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Surface texture (Surface roughness waviness and lay). (NY): ASME; 2009.
21. British Standards Institution. Geometrical product specifications (GPS). Surface texture: areal. Part 2 terms definitions and surface texture parameters. London: British Standards Institution; 2022.
22. American Concrete Institute. Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318–19) [and] commentary on building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318R–19). 2019.
23. EN 1992-1-1. Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures - Part 1–1: general rules and rules for buildings. Brussels: EN CEN; 2005.
24. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.10.00310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.10.003 ↗
25. Santos PMD, Júlio ENBS. Comparison of methods for texture assessment of concrete surfaces. ACI Mater J. 2010;107(5):433–440
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.13110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.131 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.10435010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104350 ↗
28. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72567-X10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72567-X ↗
29. Gwyddion. One-dimensional roughness parameters chapter 4. Data processing and analysis. 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 11]. Available from: http://gwyddion.net/documentation/user-guide-en/roughness-iso.html
30. 10.1117/12.257788510.1117/12.2577885 ↗
31. Carroll J. Understanding the latest in high-speed 3D imaging: part one. Vision Systems Design. 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 6]. Available from: https://www.vision-systems.com/cameras-accessories/article/14073140/understanding-the-latest-in-high-speed-3d-imaging-part-one
32. 10.1117/2.2201804.0510.1117/2.2201804.05 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41598-021-01763-910.1038/s41598-021-01763-9 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.fri.2023.20053510.1016/j.fri.2023.200535 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.10396910.1016/j.earscirev.2022.103969 ↗
36. 10.1109/LGRS.2022.316666510.1109/LGRS.2022.3166665 ↗
37. Mummery L. 3D videos and point cloud (RGBD) streaming for iOS. [cited 2024 Apr 3]. Available from: https://record3d.app/