Bone damage detection using ultrasonic guided waves: multi-feature integration and machine learning approaches
Source abstract
Abstract
Reliable detection of bone damage remains challenging due to the complex propagation of ultrasonic guided waves (UGW) and the variability of biological tissues. Most existing methods rely on single-domain handcrafted features, which limits robustness and generalisation, particularly in small-sample and heterogeneous scenarios. This study proposes a non-invasive bone damage detection framework that integrates multi-domain feature extraction, genetic algorithm (GA)-based feature selection, and a multi-feature input fully connected neural network (MFI-FCNN). UGW signals were collected from bovine cortical bone specimens with three damage severities at varying positions. A 21-dimensional feature set was constructed from time-domain, frequency-domain, and time-frequency descriptors, together with two CEEMD-based features: energy entropy and an average spatial distance-based damage metric. GA-based feature selection enhanced class separability and reduced redundancy. The proposed framework was evaluated under three protocols, including single-position, multi-position, and small-sample classification. Experimental results show that MFI-FCNN consistently outperformed conventional methods, including SVM and shallow MLP, achieving up to 100% accuracy on independent validation sets and exhibiting strong robustness to noise. These results demonstrate the effectiveness and adaptability of the proposed framework for UGW-based bone damage detection.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Bone health and osteoporosis research · Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Anhui Medical University
Funding
by the Key Project of Natural Science in Universities of Anhui Province · Anhui Excellent Young Teachers Training Project · Chuzhou Science and Technology Plan Project
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jbspin.2021.10513510.1016/j.jbspin.2021.105135 ↗
2. 10.14283/jfa.2021.410.14283/jfa.2021.4 ↗
3. 10.1186/s12873-021-00537-w10.1186/s12873-021-00537-w ↗
4. 10.2214/ajr.157.6.195087210.2214/ajr.157.6.1950872 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.10502610.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105026 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11914-023-00856-w10.1007/s11914-023-00856-w ↗
7. Glushkov E, Glushkova N, Ermolenko O, et al. Analysis of the ultrasonic guided wave sensitivity to the bone structure for osteoporosis diagnostics. In: Physics and Mechanics of New Materials and Their Applications: Proceedings of the International Conference PHENMA 2020, Kitakyushu, Japan. Springer; 2021. p. 409–424. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-76481-4_3510.1007/978-3-030-76481-4_35 ↗
8. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.303348010.1109/ACCESS.2020.3033480 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ultras.2022.10681610.1016/j.ultras.2022.106816 ↗
10. Flores W, Díaz D, Aguilera A, et al. Tailored convolutional neural network applied to fragility fracture classification using ultrasonic guided wave spectrum images. In: 2024 IEEE UFFC Latin America Ultrasonics Symposium (LAUS), Montevideo, Uruguay. IEEE; 2024. p. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/laus60931.2024.10553069
11. 10.1121/10.002817310.1121/10.0028173 ↗
12. Tran TNHT, Le LH, Li B, et al. Visualization of ultrasonic-guided-wave propagation behaviors in human long bone. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2024;95:106335.10.1016/j.bspc.2024.106335 ↗
13. Tran TNHT, Le LH, Ta D. Ultrasonic guided waves in bone: a decade of advancement in review. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2022;69(10):2875–2895.10.1109/TUFFC.2022.3197095 ↗
14. Chen H, Li Y, Tran TN, et al. Wave mode variation of multi-wavelength photoacoustic guided waves in cortical bone. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Beijing, China. IOP Publishing; 2024. p. 012019.
15. 10.1121/10.003460410.1121/10.0034604 ↗
16. Shen F, Wang Y, Liu C. Change detection in SAR images based on improved non-subsampled shearlet transform and multiscale feature fusion CNN. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens. 2021;14:12174–12186.10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3126839 ↗
17. 10.1007/s42399-023-01608-810.1007/s42399-023-01608-8 ↗
18. Tang C, Zhang W, Li H, et al. Cnn-based qualitative detection of bone mineral density via diagnostic CT slices for osteoporosis screening. Osteoporos Int. 2021;32(5):971–979.10.1007/s00198-020-05673-w ↗
19. 10.3390/en1518669510.3390/en15186695 ↗
20. El Mountassir M, Yaacoubi S, Ragot J, et al. Feature selection techniques for identifying the most relevant damage indices in SHM using guided waves. In: Proceedings of the 8th European Workshop On Structural Health Monitoring, EWSHM, Bilbao, Spain; 2016. p. 5–8.
21. 10.3390/app907144910.3390/app9071449 ↗
22. Kumar H, Das H. Software fault prediction using wrapper based feature selection approach employing genetic algorithm. In: 2022 OPJU International Technology Conference on Emerging Technologies for Sustainable Development (OTCON), Chhattisgarh, India. IEEE; 2023. p. 1–7.
23. 10.1259/bjr.2018043710.1259/bjr.20180437 ↗
24. 10.1155/2022/161246810.1155/2022/1612468 ↗
25. 10.1148/ryai.23024010.1148/ryai.230240 ↗
26. 10.1007/s00198-023-06913-510.1007/s00198-023-06913-5 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.diii.2024.02.00110.1016/j.diii.2024.02.001 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.dajour.2022.10007110.1016/j.dajour.2022.100071 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2024.11052710.1016/j.apacoust.2024.110527 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.06.08310.1016/j.neucom.2015.06.083 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.08.00710.1016/j.asoc.2014.08.007 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41598-018-28155-w10.1038/s41598-018-28155-w ↗
33. 10.1016/j.measurement.2025.11731010.1016/j.measurement.2025.117310 ↗
34. 10.1088/1361-6501/aadc4710.1088/1361-6501/aadc47 ↗
35. 10.1142/S179353691000042210.1142/S1793536910000422 ↗
36. 10.1177/147592172198957710.1177/1475921721989577 ↗
37. 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x ↗
38. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.03.01210.1016/j.cmpb.2019.03.012 ↗
39. 10.3390/app1217839210.3390/app12178392 ↗
40. Zhang Z. Improved Adam optimizer for deep neural networks. In: 2018 IEEE/ACM 26th International Symposium on Quality of Service (IWQoS) Banff, AB, Canada. IEEE; 2018. p. 1–2.