Nondestructive approach to evaluate strain changes in prestressed concrete by saw-cutting
Source abstract
Abstract
Prestressed concrete members are designed to generate concrete pre-compressive states through the prestressing force. After casting, prestress losses reduce the prestressing force, whose evaluation requires indirect determinations for existing unmonitored members. Pioneer determinations have been made by applying non-destructive methods such as saw-cutting, with limitations related to the use of electric-resistance strain gauges. As an alternative measurement approach, this paper presents a new specific methodology for evaluating concrete strain changes based solely on the use of mechanical strain gauges. The feasibility of the methodology is experimentally assessed through redundant determinations to characterise the behaviour of the Isolated Concrete Block (ICB) generated by saw-cutting a post-tensioned concrete beam. The approach offers a consistent derivation of concrete strain changes and a clear identification of the decompression state. For the selected key parameters of 120 mm distance between the pair of cuts and progressive discretised cut depths until 50 mm, the ICB presented a clear evolutive behaviour and showed full prestress release between 30 and 35 mm cut depth. The robustness of the experimental results obtained from different measurement base lengths demonstrates the viability of the conceived methodology for future applications as a basis for assessing the residual prestressing force.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Universitat Politècnica de València
Funding
Agencia Estatal de Investigación (State Research Agency) of Spain · Generalitat Valenciana
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Nawy EG. Prestressed concrete: a fundamental approach. London: Pearson; 2005.
2. 10.1016/j.measurement.2013.12.00710.1016/j.measurement.2013.12.007 ↗
3. 10.1016/J.MATPR.2023.04.31210.1016/J.MATPR.2023.04.312 ↗
4. Kim BH, Lee IK, Cho SJ. Estimation of existing prestress level on bonded strand using impact-echo test. In: Proceedings of the 6th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring (EWSHM 2012); 2012 July 3–6; Dresden, Germany; Red Hook (NY (USA)). Curran Associates, Inc; 2016. p. 256–263.
5. 10.1098/rsta.2006.193210.1098/rsta.2006.1932 ↗
6. 10.1080/10589759.2025.247523410.1080/10589759.2025.2475234 ↗
7. PIARC. Strategic plan 2020–2023 world-road-association La Défense Cedex. 2020.
8. 10.1177/036119810519280011310.1177/0361198105192800113 ↗
9. 10.1016/J.CSNDT.2014.06.00210.1016/J.CSNDT.2014.06.002 ↗
10. 10.1080/10589759.2024.234064510.1080/10589759.2024.2340645 ↗
11. 10.1080/10589759.2023.225536210.1080/10589759.2023.2255362 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.11654310.1016/j.measurement.2024.116543 ↗
13. 10.3389/fbuil.2022.95606610.3389/fbuil.2022.956066 ↗
14. 10.14359/5168790910.14359/51687909 ↗
15. 10.15554/pcij.09011996.84.9310.15554/pcij.09011996.84.93 ↗
16. 10.15554/PCIJ.05011996.82.9510.15554/PCIJ.05011996.82.95 ↗
17. 10.15554/pcij.09011991.80.9010.15554/pcij.09011991.80.90 ↗
18. 10.15554/pcij.09011993.50.6310.15554/pcij.09011993.50.63 ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000063410.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000634 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.11819410.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118194 ↗
21. 10.14359/1492610.14359/14926 ↗
22. 10.15554/pcij.03011998.62.7110.15554/pcij.03011998.62.71 ↗
23. 10.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2008.10.00410.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2008.10.004 ↗
24. 10.1111/j.1747-1567.2012.00860.x10.1111/j.1747-1567.2012.00860.x ↗
25. 10.2478/cee-2023-001510.2478/cee-2023-0015 ↗
26. 10.1111/j.1747-1567.2005.tb00238.x10.1111/j.1747-1567.2005.tb00238.x ↗
27. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.12.05910.1016/j.engstruct.2016.12.059 ↗
28. Kukay BM. Bridge instrumentation and the development of non-destructive and destructive techniques used to estimate residual tendon stress in prestressed girders [dissertation]. Logan (UT) (USA): Utah State University; 2008. Available from: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/128
29. 10.3390/ma1406133810.3390/ma14061338 ↗
30. Doneux C. Experimental assessment of prestress in existing bridges. Measurement of the remaining prestress by local relaxation of the stresses. In: Forde M, editor. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Structural Faults and Repair; 1997 July 8; Edinburgh, UK; Edinburgh (UK). Engineering Technics Press; 1997. p. 365–371.
31. 10.1016/J.MATPR.2023.03.64710.1016/J.MATPR.2023.03.647 ↗
32. 10.1007/978-3-030-86001-1_210.1007/978-3-030-86001-1_2 ↗
33. 10.1002/suco.20240027110.1002/suco.202400271 ↗
34. 10.1088/1757-899x/1015/1/01203110.1088/1757-899x/1015/1/012031 ↗
35. Mateu-Sánchez JA. Análisis del pretensado residual en vigas mediante el método experimental “saw-cut” [analysis of residual prestressing in beams using the experimental “saw-cut” method] [master’s thesis]. Valencia (Spain): Universitat Politècnica de València; 2023. Available from: https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/198971
36. 10.5169/seals-3016610.5169/seals-30166 ↗
37. 10.3390/app1511619910.3390/app15116199 ↗