journal article·2025-04-07

A multi-stage domain generalisation method via exploiting causal disentanglement for machinery fault diagnosis

Wangpeng He, Mingxuan Li, Chenxiao Feng, Zhihui Wen

Publisher page

Abstract

Traditional intelligent diagnosis models overly rely on the independent and identically distributed assumption, which makes it difficult to generalise to new operating conditions. In addition, it is difficult to collect fault sample data in practical engineering applications. To address the above problems, a multi-stage domain generalisation method via exploiting causal disentanglement is proposed for machinery fault diagnosis. The proposed framework filters out noise interference while preserving critical features through Fast Fourier Transform preprocessing combined with a multi-scale feature adaptive shrinkage ConvNeXt. Specifically, according to the causal analysis hypothesis, signal features are divided into domain-invariant and domain-specific features. As a result, this technique can effectively eliminate interference factors that are not directly causally related to fault categories, while retaining domain-invariant feature classifiers to achieve generalised diagnosis of unknown data. Meanwhile, the generalisation performance of the domain-invariant classifier is further enhanced by a multi-source domain mixup-based augmentation method. Finally, experimental results illustrate the superiority and generalisation ability of the proposed method compared with several popular fault diagnosis methods.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques · Fault Detection and Control Systems · Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Xidian University

Funding

Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi · Shaanxi Key Laboratory Open Project

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/JIOT.2024.337767410.1109/JIOT.2024.3377674 ↗
2. 10.1080/10589759.2024.241369610.1080/10589759.2024.2413696 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.10900110.1016/j.measurement.2021.109001 ↗
4. 10.1007/s00521-022-08017-310.1007/s00521-022-08017-3 ↗
5. 10.1177/1475921724125412110.1177/14759217241254121 ↗
6. 10.1177/1077546324126627710.1177/10775463241266277 ↗
7. 10.1109/JIOT.2024.340982310.1109/JIOT.2024.3409823 ↗
8. 10.1109/TR.2024.347471010.1109/TR.2024.3474710 ↗
9. 10.1109/TIM.2021.307135010.1109/TIM.2021.3071350 ↗
10. 10.1109/TIM.2022.316416310.1109/TIM.2022.3164163 ↗
11. 10.1109/TIM.2021.308848910.1109/TIM.2021.3088489 ↗
12. 10.1109/TIM.2022.315400010.1109/TIM.2022.3154000 ↗
13. 10.1109/TIM.2022.315231610.1109/TIM.2022.3152316 ↗
14. 10.1109/TIE.2018.286802310.1109/TIE.2018.2868023 ↗
15. 10.1007/s41060-024-00609-710.1007/s41060-024-00609-7 ↗
16. Huang Z, Lan Q, Li M, et al. A Multi-scale Feature Adaptation ConvNeXt for Cross-Domain Fault Diagnosis[C]. In: International Conference on Neural Computing for Advanced Applications; Singapore. Springer Nature Singapore; 2024. p. 339–353.
17. 10.1109/TII.2019.294389810.1109/TII.2019.2943898 ↗
18. 10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.0116710.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01167 ↗
19. Zhang H, Cisse M, Dauphin YN, et al. Mixup: beyond empirical risk minimization[C]. In: International Conference on Learning Representations, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 2018.
20. 10.1016/j.ress.2023.10918810.1016/j.ress.2023.109188 ↗
21. Piratla V, Netrapalli P, Sarawagi S. Efficient domain generalization via common-specific low-rank decomposition[c]. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. PMLR; 2020. p. 7728–7738.
22. 10.36001/phme.2016.v3i1.157710.36001/phme.2016.v3i1.1577 ↗
23. Lessmeier C. Kat-Data Center chair of Design and drive technology. Paderborn Germany: Paderborn University; 2024. [Online]. Available https://mb.uni-paderborn.de/kat/forschung/katdatacenter/bearing-datacenter/data-sets-and-download
24. 10.1109/TIM.2021.311630910.1109/TIM.2021.3116309 ↗
25. Gretton A, Sejdinovic D, Strathmann H, et al. Optimal kernel choice for large-scale two-sample tests. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2012;25:1205–1213.
26. 10.1609/aaai.v30i1.1030610.1609/aaai.v30i1.10306 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.10696210.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106962 ↗
28. Ganin Y, Ustinova E, Ajakan H, et al. Domain-adversarial training of neural networks. J Mach Learn Res. 2016;17(59):1–35.
29. Long M, Cao Z, Wang J, et al. Conditional adversarial domain adaptation. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2018;2018:167–179.
30. 10.1109/TMECH.2022.319998510.1109/TMECH.2022.3199985 ↗
31. Dai Z, Liu H, Le QV, et al. Coatnet: marrying convolution and attention for all data sizes. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2021;34:3965–3977.
32. PHMSociety. PHM09 data challenge. 2024 Feb. [Online]. Available https://www.phmsociety.org/competition/PHM/09/apparatus