Research on sector scanning imaging technology of EMAT for through-hole defects in aluminium plates
Source abstract
Abstract
To overcome the drawbacks of traditional electromagnetic acoustic transducers (EMATs) that depend on mechanical scanning, adding to both cost and complexity, this study introduces a sector scanning imaging method utilizing Electromagnetic Ultrasonic Shear Vertical (SV) waves. A simulation model for EMAT was developed, optimizing through variable frequency and unidirectional line focusing coils. The simulation revealed that a novel composite magnetic structure significantly enhanced the magnetic flux density to 1.318 T, a 159.44% increase over conventional magnets, leading to a 102.08% rise in ultrasonic signal intensity and a marked improvement in the signal-to-noise ratio. By converting echo signal time data into spatial coordinates, the technology enables high-resolution defect imaging. The variable frequency-EMAT (VF-EMAT) technique accurately identified defects, with minor discrepancies from actual defect centers, showcasing its precision. The unidirectional line focusing-EMAT (ULF-EMAT) method further improved defect detection accuracy and shape restoration. However, the technique’s reliance on the main-pulse limits its ability to detect near-surface defects, suggesting an avenue for future research.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Performance Monitoring Protecting of Rail Transit Infrastructure, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, China
School of Electrical and Automation Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Jiangxi graduate Student innovation special fund project
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s41745-021-00267-910.1007/s41745-021-00267-9 ↗
2. 10.1115/1.274440710.1115/1.2744407 ↗
3. 10.1109/TPEL.2022.322590410.1109/TPEL.2022.3225904 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.10214910.1016/j.ndteint.2019.102149 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.10.00110.1016/j.ndteint.2018.10.001 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2022.10263110.1016/j.ndteint.2022.102631 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.10239710.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102397 ↗
8. 10.3233/JAE-16221610.3233/JAE-162216 ↗
9. 10.1109/JSEN.2021.305165810.1109/JSEN.2021.3051658 ↗
10. Praveen A, Nikhilesh VK, Manjula K, et al. Wavelet Analysis and De-noising of signal. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol. 2012;4:5534–5538.
11. 10.3390/s1903057310.3390/s19030573 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ultras.2020.10610410.1016/j.ultras.2020.106104 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.11.01810.1016/j.ndteint.2018.11.018 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.optcom.2020.12657010.1016/j.optcom.2020.126570 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2014.06.00810.1016/j.ndteint.2014.06.008 ↗
16. 10.1080/10589759.2010.51122010.1080/10589759.2010.511220 ↗
17. 10.1109/PHM.2017.807915510.1109/PHM.2017.8079155 ↗
18. 10.3390/s2222858910.3390/s22228589 ↗
19. 10.1080/10589759.2021.197210410.1080/10589759.2021.1972104 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.32287210.1063/1.322872 ↗
21. 10.1121/1.42276010.1121/1.422760 ↗
22. 10.1109/58.75302210.1109/58.753022 ↗
23. 10.3233/JAE-19002110.3233/JAE-190021 ↗
24. 10.1080/10589759.2022.206666410.1080/10589759.2022.2066664 ↗
25. 10.1109/TUFFC.2013.286410.1109/TUFFC.2013.2864 ↗
26. 10.1109/FENDT.2016.799200410.1109/FENDT.2016.7992004 ↗