journal article·2022-09-03Open access

Sinogram interpretability based CT artefact reduction for multi-material workpieces

N. Grozmani, D. Chupina, B. Montavon, R. H. Schmitt

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) is a technology for the simultaneous inspection of internal and external features of workpieces. However, beam hardening and scattered radiation artefacts caused by the different material densities and atomic numbers commonly confound CT measurements of multi-material workpieces. Multispectral CT (MSP CT) measurements reduce artefacts by combining multiple CT volumes performed with different x-ray spectra. However, all known simulation-based CT parameter optimisation approaches for industrial applications consider only the single-spectrum case. This paper investigates the CT radon space, focusing on sinogram interpretability. Multispectral CT x-ray spectra can be determined by defining and analysing sinogram areas corresponding to equivalent volume slice artefacts. Validation indicates that the two MSP CT spectra recommended via a proposed CT simulation considering critical sinogram areas cause an artefact reduction. Results are quantified by a standard deviation reduction of measured geometrical features.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Radiation Dose and Imaging · Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

WZL , RWTH Aachen University, Chair of Production Metrology and Quality Management, Aachen, Germany

Department of Production Metrology and Quality Management, Fraunhofer Institute for Production Technology IPT, Aachen, Germany

Funding

Ministry of Education · Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cirp.2014.05.01110.1016/j.cirp.2014.05.011 ↗
2. 10.1088/1361-6501/ab10cc10.1088/1361-6501/ab10cc ↗
3. 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.07.03010.1016/j.clinimag.2020.07.030 ↗
4. 10.2214/AJR.12.911610.2214/AJR.12.9116 ↗
5. Buzug TM · 2008
6. Gusenbauer C · 2016
7. 10.1016/j.csndt.2016.05.00110.1016/j.csndt.2016.05.001 ↗
8. 10.1109/TVCG.2007.7059810.1109/TVCG.2007.70598 ↗
9. Xue H · 2009 · 904
10. 10.1016/S0167-8140(15)40951-X10.1016/S0167-8140(15)40951-X ↗
11. 10.1016/j.phro.2018.05.00410.1016/j.phro.2018.05.004 ↗
12. 10.1109/NSSMIC.2018.882443710.1109/NSSMIC.2018.8824437 ↗
13. 10.1177/230949901985117610.1177/2309499019851176 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.12.01410.1016/j.ejmp.2019.12.014 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cirp.2020.05.00910.1016/j.cirp.2020.05.009 ↗
16. 10.1007/s00330-005-2919-210.1007/s00330-005-2919-2 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.10.01410.1016/j.ejmp.2020.10.014 ↗
18. Ennen A · 2014
19. 10.1787/4e3f14db-en10.1787/4e3f14db-en ↗
20. 10.1088/1361-6501/aae4d610.1088/1361-6501/aae4d6 ↗
21. BDG. Porositätsanalyse und -beurteilung mittels industrieller röntgencomputertomographie (ct) 1–36. BGD - Richtlinienentwurf P 203 E. 2019.
22. O’-Rourke J · 2008