Real-time structural health monitoring of Yusufeli Arch Dam: a detailed analysis of dynamic characteristics during water impoundment
Source abstract
Abstract
Monitoring the dynamic behaviour of large concrete dams during reservoir impoundment is critical for ensuring their structural safety and operational performance. Although arch dams exhibit high rigidity, they are sensitive to environmental influences such as reservoir water level fluctuations and temperature variations, which can significantly affect their modal characteristics. This study presents a real-time structural health monitoring (SHM) approach applied to the Yusufeli Arch Dam, covering both the empty reservoir state and progressive water impoundment stages. Ambient vibration tests were conducted when the reservoir was empty to establish baseline dynamic properties. A cloud-based monitoring platform was developed to continuously collect, store, process, interpret, and visualise sensor data. The platform allows real-time graphing of raw signals and triggers alarms when predefined thresholds are exceeded. Operational modal analysis was employed to track changes in the dam’s natural frequencies and mode shapes during different reservoir conditions. The findings offer valuable insights into the dam’s structural performance, contributing to enhanced safety, long-term durability, and resilience planning for future hydroelectric infrastructure.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dam Engineering and Safety · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Water Systems and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Karadeniz Technical University
Dynamic Academy Software Construction Industry Trade Ltd. Comp
General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works (DSI)
Funding
Karadeniz Technical University Scientific Research Project
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1162/152638005479485310.1162/1526380054794853 ↗
2. Novokshchenov V. Old Aswan Dam: standing the test of time. Civ Eng. 1997;67(10):77–79.
3. 10.1680/cien.144.1.170.3955310.1680/cien.144.1.170.39553 ↗
4. 10.1061/41141(390)2010.1061/41141(390)20 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2015.03.00110.1016/j.jrmge.2015.03.001 ↗
6. 10.1007/978-3-642-80263-8_11210.1007/978-3-642-80263-8_112 ↗
7. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(200005)29:5<577::AID-EQE924>3.0.CO;2-P10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(200005)29:5<577::AID-EQE924>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
8. Okuma N, Etou Y, Kanazawa K, et al. Dynamic properties of a large arch dam after forty-four years of completion. In: Paper presented at: 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering; Beijing, China; 2008.
9. Oliveira S, Espada M, Camara R. Long-term dynamic monitoring of arch dams: the case of Cabril dam, Portugal. In: 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering; Lisbon, Portugal; 2012.
10. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.03910.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.039 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.07610.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.076 ↗
12. 10.7712/120119.7213.1946610.7712/120119.7213.19466 ↗
13. 10.28991/cej-2020-0309160310.28991/cej-2020-03091603 ↗
14. Pereira SB. Structural condition assessment of dams based on continuous dynamic monitoring [dissertation]. Porto (Portugal): University of Porto Faculty of Engineering; 2020.
15. Oliveira S, Alegre A. A study on the influence of horizontal cracking on the modal parameters of Cabril Dam: experimental and numerical results. In: Paper presented at: 8th World Conference on Structural Control and Monitoring; Orlando, (FL), USA; 2022.
16. Kalkan Okur E. Determination of structural behavior and long-term structural health monitoring in Deriner and Yusufeli arch dams by considering structure-water-soil interaction [dissertation]. Trabzon (Türkiye): Karadeniz Technical University Institute of Science; 2024. Turkish.
17. 10.2514/6.2013-162610.2514/6.2013-1626 ↗
18. Ziyad D. Experimental and finite element studies of a large arch dam [dissertation]. Pasadena (CA): California Institute of Technology; 1988.
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1995)9:4(286)10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1995)9:4(286) ↗
20. 10.1002/eqe.429024080510.1002/eqe.4290240805 ↗
21. Mivehchi MR, Ahmadi MT, Hajmomeni A. Effective techniques for arch dam ambient vibration test: application on two Iranian dams. JSEE. 2003;5(2):23–34.
22. Sevim B. Determination of dynamic behavior of arch dams using finite element and experimental modal analysis methods [dissertation]. Trabzon (Türkiye): Karadeniz Technical University Institute of Science; 2010. Turkish.
23. 10.1088/1742-6596/744/1/01203710.1088/1742-6596/744/1/012037 ↗
24. Ghanaat Y, Clough RW, Redpath BB. Experimental study of dam-water-foundation interaction. In: Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering; Spain; 1992.
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:8(926)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:8(926) ↗
26. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.01.01210.1016/j.engstruct.2006.01.012 ↗
27. 10.1002/eqe.63710.1002/eqe.637 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jsv.2007.01.00810.1016/j.jsv.2007.01.008 ↗
29. Wang H, Li D, Tu J. Challenge in the study of ultimate capacity of high arch dams under earthquakes. In: Second European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology; Istanbul, Türkiye; 2014.
30. 10.1007/s12205-011-0815-710.1007/s12205-011-0815-7 ↗
31. 10.12989/sem.2011.37.6.59310.12989/sem.2011.37.6.593 ↗
32. 10.12989/cac.2012.10.3.27710.12989/cac.2012.10.3.277 ↗
33. 10.12989/acc2013.1.3.22710.12989/acc2013.1.3.227 ↗
34. 10.12989/cac.2014.14.5.59910.12989/cac.2014.14.5.599 ↗
35. 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000089010.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000890 ↗
36. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000152010.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001520 ↗
37. Altunışık AC, Günaydın M, Sevim B, et al. System identification of arch dam model strengthened with CFRP composite materials. Steel Compos Struct. 2017;25(2):231–244.
38. 10.1007/978-981-99-6026-2_4810.1007/978-981-99-6026-2_48 ↗
39. 10.3390/w1618269410.3390/w16182694 ↗
40. 10.3390/w1605074610.3390/w16050746 ↗
41. 10.3390/app1201048110.3390/app12010481 ↗
42. 10.1002/eqe.5510.1002/eqe.55 ↗
43. 10.1002/eqe.11810.1002/eqe.118 ↗
44. 10.1007/BF0324143010.1007/BF03241430 ↗
45. Lemos JV, Oliveira S, Mendes P. Analysis of the dynamic behaviour of Cabril Dam considering the influence of contraction joints. In: 7th European Conference on Structural Dynamics; Southampton, (UK); 2008 Jul 7–9.
46. 10.1155/2014/69270910.1155/2014/692709 ↗
47. Brincker R, Ventura CE, Andersen P. Why output-only modal testing is a desirable tool for a wide range of practical applications. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC); Kissimmee, (FL), USA; 2003.
48. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199911)28:11<1327::AID-EQE869>3.0.CO;2-V10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199911)28:11<1327::AID-EQE869>3.0.CO;2-V ↗
49. Ghanaat Y, Hall RL, Redpath BB. Measurement and computation of dynamic response of arch dams including interaction effects. J Seismol Earthq Eng. 2000;2:1–19.
50. Mendes P, Oliveira S, Guerreiro L, et al. Dynamic behavior of concrete dams monitoring and modeling. In: 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering; Vancouver, Canada; 2004 Aug 1–6.
51. 10.1002/eqe.57510.1002/eqe.575 ↗
52. 10.1007/s10921-009-0061-910.1007/s10921-009-0061-9 ↗
53. Küçükbaşol Y. Coruh River and Yusufeli Dam: a dam review in terms of social, economic and environmental impacts. Dergi Park. 2015;5(2):133–158.
54. General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works (DSI). Ankara (Türkiye): DSI; 2024.
55. Structural Vibration Solution A/S. Operational Modal Analysis. Release 4.0. Denmark; 2023.
56. Okur FY. Development of engineering softwares for damage detection and long-term structural health monitoring of engineering structures [dissertation]. Trabzon (Türkiye): Karadeniz Technical University Institute of Science; 2023. Turkish.
57. 10.1155/stc/626788410.1155/stc/6267884 ↗
58. 10.1007/978-3-030-64594-6_3210.1007/978-3-030-64594-6_32 ↗
59. 10.1007/s13349-024-00828-310.1007/s13349-024-00828-3 ↗