journal article·2025-07-03Open access

Identification of weld defects from ultrasonic signals using GASF and an improved DCGAN-ResNet network

Yuan Chen, Hao Shen, Guangming Zhang, Ming Dong, Xiang Wan

Abstract

In this paper, a method for weld defect identification from ultrasonic signals using the Gramian Angular Summation Field (GASF) and an improved deep convolutional generative adversarial network and residual network (DCGAN-ResNet) is proposed to overcome the problems of small-sample imbalance of echo signals as well as the low identification accuracy and poor efficiency of traditional convolutional neural networks (CNN). Firstly, the DCGAN model is improved based on Wasserstein distance and spectral normalisation, and the augmented dataset is used to validate its effectiveness. Then, the residual block for the ResNet model is improved using group convolution to enhance the nonlinear representation of the network and reduce the number of parameters and computations. Finally, the squeeze-and-excitation (SE) attention mechanism is introduced for feature recalibration to enhance attention to important features and recognition efficiency. Experimental results show that the improved DCGAN-ResNet method outperforms other commonly used methods in terms of feature extraction, recognition accuracy and efficiency for weld defects, and its test accuracy reaches 91.99%, which is 14.36% higher than that before dataset augmentation. Thus, the proposed method is effective and feasible for weld defect recognition from ultrasonic signals under small-sample imbalance conditions, and can also be applied to other pattern recognition fields.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Xi’an University of Science and Technology

Liverpool John Moores University

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Chi DZ, Qi CC. Research on NDT based on acoustic in welding defects testing in China. J Netshape Forming Eng. 2018;10(1):74–81.
2. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.62010.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.620 ↗
3. 10.1109/JSEN.2019.295420610.1109/JSEN.2019.2954206 ↗
4. Han XD, Li GY, Hu YN, et al. Research on time-domain ultrasonic signal recognition technology based on one-dimensional CNN. Electron Meas Technol. 2022;45(12):20–25.
5. 10.1080/10589759.2022.209437710.1080/10589759.2022.2094377 ↗
6. Xu JM, Ke LM. Characteristic feature based on wavelet packet pattern recognition for ultrasonic inspection signals from defects in FSW joints using artificial neural network. Nucl Power Eng. 2020;41(1):163–166.
7. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.05.00210.1016/j.apacoust.2014.05.002 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.08.10510.1016/j.ijleo.2017.08.105 ↗
9. Shi CL, Shi FF, Zhang BX. Defect type analysis based on deep neural network and wavelet packet transform. Acta Acoustica. 2016;41(4):499–506.
10. 10.1080/08839514.2021.197539110.1080/08839514.2021.1975391 ↗
11. 10.1080/10589759.2023.225349410.1080/10589759.2023.2253494 ↗
12. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.300545010.1109/ACCESS.2020.3005450 ↗
13. Zhi ZL, Jiang HQ, Yang DY, et al. A deep learning fusion model of wave and image data for weld defect recognition. J Xi’an Jiaotong Univ. 2021;55(5):73–82.
14. 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.09.01110.1016/j.measurement.2018.09.011 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.10302910.1016/j.ndteint.2023.103029 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.06.08110.1016/j.istruc.2021.06.081 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.patcog.2022.10905010.1016/j.patcog.2022.109050 ↗
18. 10.3390/s2210393610.3390/s22103936 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.future.2018.11.05410.1016/j.future.2018.11.054 ↗
20. Wang ZG, Oates T. Imaging time-series to improve classification and imputation. The 24th. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence July 25-31 2015 Buenos Aires, Argentina; 2015 (AAAI Press). p. 3939–3945.
21. 10.1080/10589759.2024.231926110.1080/10589759.2024.2319261 ↗
22. 10.5768/JAO202142.010700210.5768/JAO202142.0107002 ↗
23. Ding L, Wan HP, Lu QB, et al. Using deep learning to identify the depth of metal surface defects with narrowband SAW signals. 157. Optics & Laser Technology. 2023;108758.
24. 10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.01.01210.1016/j.jmsy.2021.01.012 ↗
25. Luo J, Huang JY. Generative adversarial network: an overview. Chin J Sci Instrument. 2019;40(3):74–84.
26. 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.11224510.1016/j.measurement.2022.112245 ↗
27. Liu YQ, Cai HY, Li WK, et al. Research on deep convolutional generative adversarial networks diagnosis method for bearing fault under small sample condition. J Vibr, Meas & Diagnosis. 2023;43(4):817–823+836.
28. 10.3390/s2305254210.3390/s23052542 ↗
29. 10.1109/5.72679110.1109/5.726791 ↗
30. 10.1109/MSP.2017.276520210.1109/MSP.2017.2765202 ↗
31. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.9010.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
32. 10.1109/CVPR.2018.0074510.1109/CVPR.2018.00745 ↗
33. AdlerJ,LunzS.Banach Wasserstein Gan. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, December 3-8, 2018, Montréal Canada; 2018 (Curran Associates Inc.), p. 6755–6764.
34. Miyato T, Kataoka T, Koyama M, et al. Spectral normalization for generative adversarial networks. Vancouver (BC), Canada: ICLR, Vancouver Convention Center; 2018 Apr-May 30.