journal article·2026-01-02

Prediction of characteristics of pervious concrete by machine learning technique using mix parameters and non-destructive test measurements

Navaratnarajah Sathiparan, Sathushka Heshan Wijekoon, Pratheeba Jeyananthan, Daniel Niruban Subramaniam

Publisher page

Abstract

Ensuring quality in pervious concrete poses challenges, limiting its use. This work investigates the potential of machine learning to forecast its properties, offering a novel and explicable approach. Five machine learning techniques were employed on 300 experimental data points, considering mix parameters (aggregate size, aggregate-to-cement ratio and compaction) and non-destructive measurements (ultrasonic velocity, electrical resistivity). Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) excelled, achieving the highest accuracy (R2 > 0.97) in predicting porosity and compressive strength, with root mean squared errors (RMSEs) of 0.02 and 0.5 MPa, respectively. Sensitivity analysis revealed a dominant influence of compaction energy, aggregate-to-cement ratio and ultrasonic velocity, while aggregate size and resistivity had compromised impact. Findings suggest that machine learning models, particularly ANNs, can be reliably implemented in construction quality control, facilitating real-time assessments and ensuring optimal performance of pervious concrete. This predictive capability can improve quality control processes, ultimately encouraging broader adoption in the construction sector and contributing to more sustainable infrastructure.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Urban Stormwater Management Solutions · Smart Materials for Construction · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Jaffna

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s13762-023-05440-410.1007/s13762-023-05440-4 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.05410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.054 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.13710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.137 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.15110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.151 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0076410.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00764 ↗
6. 10.1007/s42107-023-00757-410.1007/s42107-023-00757-4 ↗
7. 10.54113/j.sust.2024.00005210.54113/j.sust.2024.000052 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10524910.1016/j.jobe.2022.105249 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.11062710.1016/j.jobe.2024.110627 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e0299110.1016/j.cscm.2024.e02991 ↗
11. 10.1007/s42107-023-00790-310.1007/s42107-023-00790-3 ↗
12. Seeni B, Madasamy M. A review of factors influencing performance of pervious concrete. Gradevinar. 2021;10:1007–1030.
13. 10.1063/5.004459110.1063/5.0044591 ↗
14. 10.1080/10298436.2022.205502210.1080/10298436.2022.2055022 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00966-310.1016/S0008-8846(02)00966-3 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11926010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119260 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.04010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.040 ↗
18. Chindaprasirt P, Hatanaka S, Mishima N, et al. Effects of binder strength and aggregate size on the compressive strength and void ratio of porous concrete. Int J Miner, Metall Mater. 2009;16(6):714–719.
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.05110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.051 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.13510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.135 ↗
21. 10.1080/10298436.2018.155421710.1080/10298436.2018.1554217 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.08610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.086 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2009)21:12(764)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2009)21:12(764) ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.05710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.057 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.09.01010.1016/j.cemconres.2016.09.010 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.03910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.039 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.03910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.039 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41598-021-00447-810.1038/s41598-021-00447-8 ↗
29. 10.31436/iiumej.v19i2.91910.31436/iiumej.v19i2.919 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.07710.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.077 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.08.00310.1016/j.ijprt.2016.08.003 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.04310.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.043 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.08210.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.082 ↗
34. 10.1080/10589759.2024.239372110.1080/10589759.2024.2393721 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.corsci.2015.05.06310.1016/j.corsci.2015.05.063 ↗
36. 10.1680/macr.15.0007610.1680/macr.15.00076 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.11110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.111 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12395910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123959 ↗
39. 10.1007/s11709-019-0597-410.1007/s11709-019-0597-4 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12058110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120581 ↗
41. Neithalath N Weiss J Olek J. editors. Predicting the permeability of pervious concrete (Enhanced porosity concrete) from non-destructive electrical measurements. 2006.
42. 10.3141/2113-1610.3141/2113-16 ↗
43. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000226810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002268 ↗
44. 10.1590/s1983-4195202000030000310.1590/s1983-41952020000300003 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0084010.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00840 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12028610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120286 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12610310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126103 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12502110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125021 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11700010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117000 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.clema.2022.10013210.1016/j.clema.2022.100132 ↗
51. 10.1007/s00366-018-0601-y10.1007/s00366-018-0601-y ↗
52. 10.1080/10589759.2024.243163410.1080/10589759.2024.2431634 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.04410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.044 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11977610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119776 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.02.00910.1016/j.asoc.2016.02.009 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10630710.1016/j.jobe.2023.106307 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.11710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.117 ↗
58. Sudhir Kumar B, Srikanth K, Eeshwar T. Implementation of soft computing techniques in forecasting compressive strength and permeability of pervious concrete blended with ground granulated blast-furnace slag. J Soft Comput Civ Eng. 2024;8(2):19–45.
59. 10.1007/s12205-022-1918-z10.1007/s12205-022-1918-z ↗
60. 10.1007/s42107-023-00811-110.1007/s42107-023-00811-1 ↗
61. 10.1080/10298436.2023.228714610.1080/10298436.2023.2287146 ↗
62. 10.1007/s42107-023-00956-z10.1007/s42107-023-00956-z ↗
63. 10.1016/j.asej.2020.02.00910.1016/j.asej.2020.02.009 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10647010.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106470 ↗
65. 10.3390/buildings1102004410.3390/buildings11020044 ↗
66. 10.3390/app919405310.3390/app9194053 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11923810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119238 ↗
68. Tahwia Ahmed M, Heniegal A, Elgamal Mohamed S, et al. The prediction of compressive strength and non-destructive tests of sustainable concrete by using artificial neural networks. Comput Concr. 2021;27(1):21–28.
69. 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.11400610.1016/j.measurement.2023.114006 ↗
70. 10.1080/10589759.2023.224094010.1080/10589759.2023.2240940 ↗
71. 10.1080/10589759.2024.230425710.1080/10589759.2024.2304257 ↗
72. BS-EN:1097–6. Tests for mechanical and physical properties of aggregates - Determination of particle density and water absorption. British Standards Institution (UK).
73. BS-EN:933–3. Tests for geometrical properties of aggregates - Determination of particle shape. Flakiness index. British Standards Institution (UK).
74. BS-EN:1097–2. Tests for mechanical and physical properties of aggregates - Methods for the determination of resistance to fragmentation. British Standards Institution (UK).
75. ASTM C131/C131M. Standard test method for resistance to degradation of small-size coarse aggregate by abrasion and impact in the los angeles machine. ASTM International West Conshohocken (PA).
76. BS-EN:12350–2. Testing fresh concrete - Slump-test. British Standards Institution (UK).
77. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12108410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121084 ↗
78. 10.3390/buildings1409293510.3390/buildings14092935 ↗
79. 10.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.2410.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.24 ↗
80. 10.1007/s42947-023-00377-w10.1007/s42947-023-00377-w ↗
81. 10.1080/10298436.2024.238052310.1080/10298436.2024.2380523 ↗
82. 10.1080/10298436.2022.205502210.1080/10298436.2022.2055022 ↗
83. 10.1007/s13369-022-06737-110.1007/s13369-022-06737-1 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.08810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.088 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.02210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.022 ↗
86. Tennis PD Leming ML Akers DJ. Pervious concrete pavements (No.Pcaserialno. 2828). Skokie (IL): Portland Cement Association; 2004.
87. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.09.02410.1016/j.msea.2010.09.024 ↗
88. BS-1377-2. Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes - Classification tests and determination of geotechnical properties. British Standards Institution (BSI) London.
89. 10.1186/s43065-021-00033-210.1186/s43065-021-00033-2 ↗
90. ASTM-C109. Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (using 2-in. Or [50 mm] cube specimens). ASTM International West Conshohocken (PA).
91. ASTM-C597. Standard test method for pulse velocity through concrete. ASTM International West Conshohocken (PA).
92. ASTM-C1876. Standard test method for bulk electrical resistivity or bulk conductivity of concrete. ASTM International West Conshohocken (PA).
93. 10.1371/journal.pone.026584610.1371/journal.pone.0265846 ↗
94. 10.1016/j.jmva.2013.08.01410.1016/j.jmva.2013.08.014 ↗
95. 10.1371/journal.pone.024537610.1371/journal.pone.0245376 ↗
96. 10.1080/10589759.2024.237556510.1080/10589759.2024.2375565 ↗
97. 10.1016/j.jweia.2021.10486010.1016/j.jweia.2021.104860 ↗
98. 10.1080/10589759.2024.238108310.1080/10589759.2024.2381083 ↗
99. 10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00173-710.1016/B978-008045405-4.00173-7 ↗
100. 10.1080/10589759.2024.243114310.1080/10589759.2024.2431143 ↗