Three-dimensional reconstruction of transverse hole defect in plate based on TOFD inspection
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, aluminium plate specimens with circular transverse hole defect was prepared, and the specimen was subjected to ultrasonic non-destructive testing using the TOFD (Time-of-Flight Diffraction) inspection method. Simultaneously, addressing the issue of three-dimensional reconstruction of defect within the field of ultrasonic non-destructive testing, a method combining the least squares approach and volumetric rendering was proposed to process the B-scan images obtained from TOFD inspection. This method was used to reconstruct the three-dimensional shape of transverse hole defect. The result shows that processing defect information acquired through TOFD inspection using the integrated approach of least squares and volumetric rendering leads to clear three-dimensional reconstruction images. This research offers an efficient method for the three-dimensional visualisation of transverse hole defect in plate.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Optical measurement and interference techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Anhui University of Science and Technology
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/BF0326649110.1007/BF03266491 ↗
2. 10.1784/insi.2010.52.11.59710.1784/insi.2010.52.11.597 ↗
3. 10.1007/s10921-018-0465-510.1007/s10921-018-0465-5 ↗
4. 10.3390/machines1010083910.3390/machines10100839 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ultras.2017.11.00110.1016/j.ultras.2017.11.001 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.10.00710.1016/j.ndteint.2009.10.007 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ultras.2020.10610610.1016/j.ultras.2020.106106 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2022.10273210.1016/j.ndteint.2022.102732 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.phpro.2015.08.29210.1016/j.phpro.2015.08.292 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.157020910.1063/1.1570209 ↗
11. 10.1088/1742-6596/2467/1/01200510.1088/1742-6596/2467/1/012005 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.10848510.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108485 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cirp.2022.04.03310.1016/j.cirp.2022.04.033 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.10446910.1016/j.autcon.2022.104469 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.10382910.1016/j.autcon.2021.103829 ↗
16. 10.1080/10589759.2019.168448910.1080/10589759.2019.1684489 ↗
17. 10.1088/1742-6596/1631/1/01205010.1088/1742-6596/1631/1/012050 ↗
18. Pei Y, Xie G, Ma C, et al. Application of comparison test block for TOFD testing of continuous sharp angle artificial defects. Nondestr Test. 2022;44(2):65–72.