Monitoring of breathing cracks of RC beams based on nonlinear vibro-acoustic modulation technique
Source abstract
Abstract
For challenges of early microcrack monitoring of reinforced concrete (RC) structures, a nonlinear vibro-acoustic modulation (VAM) based study was carried out, aiming at investigating the influence law between the excitation signal form and the nonlinear effect of sensing signals through both finite element analysis (FEA) and experimental validation. The mechanism of the nonlinearity in sensing signals coming from microcrack surface vibration collisions due to the breathing effect was found which is the theoretical basis of the VAM-based damage detection. The results show that the nonlinear modulation effect is the highest at the resonant frequency of the structure. The side frequency (SF) amplitude of VAM-based sensing signal in the RC beams with microcracks (damage degree between 0% and 70%) is obvious, but when the cracks continue developing, the effective contact area decreases sharply during the crack opening and closing process due to the nonlinear contact between interfacial crack surfaces. As the width of microcrack is altered from 0 nm to 100 nm, the normalised nonlinear coefficient β is reduced from 0.4 to 0.06 in the approximate form of power function, which can be used to characterise the damage development of the early cracks in RC structures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil Engineering, Shenyang Jianzhu University, Shenyang, China
Nanjing TICA Climate Solutions Co. Ltd, Nanjing, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.apm.2020.02.01610.1016/j.apm.2020.02.016 ↗
2. 10.1177/147592172093099010.1177/1475921720930990 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.12.01910.1016/j.ymssp.2018.12.019 ↗
4. 10.1177/107754632096031210.1177/1077546320960312 ↗
5. 10.1177/147592171983695310.1177/1475921719836953 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.10797910.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107979 ↗
7. 10.1143/JJAP.39.553810.1143/JJAP.39.5538 ↗
8. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/9/09505510.1088/0964-1726/25/9/095055 ↗
9. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.413-414.3910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.413-414.39 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.10212810.1016/j.ndteint.2019.102128 ↗
11. 10.3390/s1805130710.3390/s18051307 ↗
12. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/3/03300110.1088/0964-1726/23/3/033001 ↗
13. 10.3390/s1807225110.3390/s18072251 ↗
14. 10.1177/147592171036541910.1177/1475921710365419 ↗
15. 10.1088/0964-1726/17/3/03300110.1088/0964-1726/17/3/033001 ↗
16. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/11/11502010.1088/0964-1726/24/11/115020 ↗
17. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/4/04700110.1088/0964-1726/18/4/047001 ↗
18. Fedele R, Praticò FG Monitoring infrastructure asset through its acoustic signatures. Proceedings of 48th International Congress of Exposition of Noise Control Engineering, Noise Control for Better Environment; 2019 June 16-19; Madrid, Spain.
19. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11277810.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112778 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00329-X10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00329-X ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.09.00810.1016/j.cemconres.2003.09.008 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.11.01410.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.11.014 ↗
23. 10.3901/JME.2011.08.00210.3901/JME.2011.08.002 ↗
24. Andrei DD, Donskoy D, Chudnovsky A. Micro and macroscale damage detection using the nonlinear acoustic vibro-modulation technique. Res Nondestruct Eval. 2009;19(2):104–128.
25. 10.1088/0964-1726/15/4/02510.1088/0964-1726/15/4/025 ↗
26. 10.1098/rspa.2005.162010.1098/rspa.2005.1620 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2007.09.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2007.09.004 ↗
28. 10.1121/1.344802410.1121/1.3448024 ↗
29. Stauffer JD, Woodward CB, White KR. Nonlinear ultrasonic testing with resonant and pulse velocity parameters for early damage in concrete. ACI Mater J. 2005;102(2):118–121.
30. 10.1080/10589759.2015.103471810.1080/10589759.2015.1034718 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2015.12.00310.1016/j.ndteint.2015.12.003 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.05.01410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.05.014 ↗
33. 10.1070/PU1971v013n06ABEH00428110.1070/PU1971v013n06ABEH004281 ↗
34. Zagrai A, Donskoy D, Chudnovsky A Nonlinear acoustic structural health monitoring. Proceedings of 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference; 2006 May 1-4; Newport, RI. Published by the AIAA, Inc.
35. Jiao JP, Li HP, Lv HT, et al. [Numerical simulation of nonlinear interaction between ultrasonic wave and microcracks in different directions]. J Univ Sci Tech B. 2018;44(05):708–715.
36. 10.1177/147592171668938510.1177/1475921716689385 ↗
37. Qi BX, Zhang Y, Li JR, et al. [Numerical simulation of concrete damage detection based on piezoelectric sensor]. Piezoelectrics and Acoustooptics. 2018;40(03):442–447. Chinese.
38. 10.1016/j.jsv.2008.04.03910.1016/j.jsv.2008.04.039 ↗
39. Qiao S, Zhu JX, Lv BL, et al. [Numerical simulation of ultrasonic nonlinear evaluation of microcrack group damage]. Nondestr Test. 2020;42(04):50–44. (Chinese).
40. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.05.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2019.05.004 ↗
41. 10.1016/S0963-8695(00)00063-310.1016/S0963-8695(00)00063-3 ↗
42. Zagrai A, Donskoy D, Lottiaux JL. N-Scan®: new vibro-modulation system for crack detection, monitoring and characterization. In: Thompson D, and Chimenti D, editors. Review of Quantitative Nondestructive EvaluationVol. 23, Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics; 2004. p. 1414–1421.