A novel pipeline defect detection system with enhanced magnetic moment and focused probe using spatial distance algorithm
Source abstract
Abstract
Harmonic magnetic field detection for pipes has the merits of penetration and sensitivity. However, issues like the probe’s shape, limited data characterisation, and poor targeting restrict the detection distance. To address this, a novel defect detection system using targeted magnetic moment enhancement and targeted magnetic field focusing probe and its spatial distance algorithm is proposed to detect in-service steel pipe damage. The excitation coil structure is designed to increase the effective detection distance and focus the diffuse magnetic field. A full bridge balanced differential circuit control steategy, separate from the detection end, is adopted to extend datacharacterisation. Also, a spatial distance harmonic inner product correlation layer resolution matching tracking algorithm is proposed to alleviate the problem of the insufficiently targeted characterisation of detection data using harmonic signals under real acquisition conditions. Experiments on 20# steel pipes demonstratethat the system can discriminate the defect severity and achieve full wall thickness detection. It shows advantages in enhancing detection height andidentification clarity, especially useful for pipes with ultra-thick claddings or larger burial depths in extreme conditions, thus providing a new approach for practical engineering detection.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Beijing University of Technology
Beijing Institute of Technology
China Special Equipment Inspection and Research Institute
Funding
Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission, Administrative Commission of Zhongguancun Science Park
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.11324910.1016/j.measurement.2023.113249 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.specom.2016.12.00410.1016/j.specom.2016.12.004 ↗
3. Wang W, Dong H, Zhan F, et al. Development status and application prospects of non-excavation NoPig detection technology. Oil Gas Storage Transp. 2012;31(3):161–164. doi: CNKI:13-1093/TE.20111209.1106.002
4. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2011.09.00710.1016/j.ndteint.2011.09.007 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10921-015-0292-x10.1007/s10921-015-0292-x ↗
6. 10.1007/s10921-020-00730-010.1007/s10921-020-00730-0 ↗
7. 10.3390/s2008228510.3390/s20082285 ↗
8. 10.1109/77.91958810.1109/77.919588 ↗
9. 10.1002/stc.200710.1002/stc.2007 ↗
10. 10.3390/s2103081110.3390/s21030811 ↗
11. 10.3390/s1812447010.3390/s18124470 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.04.09110.1016/j.measurement.2019.04.091 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2021.10257010.1016/j.ndteint.2021.102570 ↗
14. 10.1109/TIE.2020.298970410.1109/TIE.2020.2989704 ↗
15. 10.3390/electronics803030910.3390/electronics8030309 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.11.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2009.11.004 ↗
17. 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.312342110.1109/ACCESS.2021.3123421 ↗
18. 10.3390/s1603029810.3390/s16030298 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10921-010-0083-310.1007/s10921-010-0083-3 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10785910.1016/j.measurement.2020.107859 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.07.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2012.07.004 ↗
22. 10.1109/TMAG.2015.239014410.1109/TMAG.2015.2390144 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.03.00210.1016/j.ndteint.2018.03.002 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.07.01110.1016/j.ndteint.2017.07.011 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10921-012-0137-910.1007/s10921-012-0137-9 ↗
26. 10.1109/TIE.2023.328817710.1109/TIE.2023.3288177 ↗
27. 10.1109/TIE.2023.325074710.1109/TIE.2023.3250747 ↗
28. 10.1109/TIE.2021.306395810.1109/TIE.2021.3063958 ↗
29. 10.1109/JSEN.2022.314039010.1109/JSEN.2022.3140390 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10770010.1016/j.measurement.2020.107700 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.10953410.1016/j.measurement.2021.109534 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.02.05410.1016/j.ymssp.2019.02.054 ↗
33. 10.1109/PIERS-Spring46901.2019.901775510.1109/PIERS-Spring46901.2019.9017755 ↗
34. 10.24425/mms.2021.13599210.24425/mms.2021.135992 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.11074610.1016/j.measurement.2022.110746 ↗
36. 10.1109/TIM.2018.286629910.1109/TIM.2018.2866299 ↗
37. 10.24425/mms.2019.12958710.24425/mms.2019.129587 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.sna.2005.04.00810.1016/j.sna.2005.04.008 ↗
39. 10.1109/JSEN.2010.204342910.1109/JSEN.2010.2043429 ↗
40. 10.3390/s1810319910.3390/s18103199 ↗