Reducing false damage detections in guided ultrasonic wave monitoring systems using a denoising autoencoder
Source abstract
Abstract
Guided ultrasonic wave (GUW) monitoring systems for pipeline structures are gaining much attention in critical sectors such as the petrochemical, nuclear and energy sectors. However, the effects of environmental and operational conditions (EOCs), especially temperature, may generate substantial false damage detections. The temperature effect may interfere with different coherent noise sources and generate unwanted peaks that are falsely identified as damage. In this paper, a denoising autoencoder (DAE) is proposed to reduce the frequency of false damage detections in GUW monitoring systems. A DAE decodes high dimensional data into low-dimensional features and reconstructs the original data from these low-dimensional features. By providing signals at a reference temperature with the fewest false damage detections, this structure forces the DAE to learn the essential features hidden within complex data. A database of GUW signals is formed based on the experimental measurements using a six-metre-long stainless steel Schedule 20 pipe. Variations in temperature and damage severity are applied to develop the database to mimic a simple step change in damage growth under EOCs. The outcomes obtained from this study show that the proposed methodology can reduce false damage detections during GUW monitoring and is valuable for pipeline safety evaluations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Geophysical Methods and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
VRG Dinamik Sdn. Bhd
Curtin University
Funding
Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jmsy.2024.02.00610.1016/j.jmsy.2024.02.006 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.04.01310.1016/j.ymssp.2019.04.013 ↗
3. 10.1007/s13349-024-00761-510.1007/s13349-024-00761-5 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.10421010.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.104210 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.10828210.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108282 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.05.02210.1016/j.ymssp.2016.05.022 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.10.01210.1016/j.ymssp.2018.10.012 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.11129210.1016/j.measurement.2022.111292 ↗
9. 10.1098/rsta.2006.193510.1098/rsta.2006.1935 ↗
10. 10.5772/intechopen.8336610.5772/intechopen.83366 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ultras.2005.05.00110.1016/j.ultras.2005.05.001 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0233111010.1007/BF02331110 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.07.00710.1016/j.commatsci.2005.07.007 ↗
14. 10.1177/147592171452284610.1177/1475921714522846 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jsv.2009.01.05210.1016/j.jsv.2009.01.052 ↗
16. 10.1002/stc.177610.1002/stc.1776 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.10.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2018.10.004 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41598-024-54418-w10.1038/s41598-024-54418-w ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.05010.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.050 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.05.02210.1016/j.ymssp.2016.05.022 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.03.01010.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.03.010 ↗
22. 10.1155/2019/809721310.1155/2019/8097213 ↗
23. 10.1002/stc.223010.1002/stc.2230 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.10876110.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108761 ↗
25. 10.13140/RG.2.2.33546.8288910.13140/RG.2.2.33546.82889 ↗
26. 10.3390/inventions401001710.3390/inventions4010017 ↗
27. 10.1109/TIM.2021.309120410.1109/TIM.2021.3091204 ↗
28. 10.1177/147592171769357210.1177/1475921717693572 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.10665310.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106653 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ultras.2014.12.00510.1016/j.ultras.2014.12.005 ↗
31. 10.1109/JPROC.2015.245121810.1109/JPROC.2015.2451218 ↗
32. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/5/05503410.1088/0964-1726/25/5/055034 ↗
33. 10.1098/rspa.2016.073610.1098/rspa.2016.0736 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.10910.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.109 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.08.10410.1016/j.neucom.2015.08.104 ↗
36. 10.1177/147592172094283610.1177/1475921720942836 ↗
37. 10.1177/147592171880030610.1177/1475921718800306 ↗
38. 10.5555/175600610.5555/1756006 ↗
39. 10.1109/IJCNN.2015.728056810.1109/IJCNN.2015.7280568 ↗
40. Kingma DP, Ba J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In: 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015 - Conference Track Proceedings; San Diego. 2014. p. 1–15.
41. 10.1016/B978-0-12-811318-9.00023-510.1016/B978-0-12-811318-9.00023-5 ↗
42. 10.1177/147592172093405110.1177/1475921720934051 ↗
43. 10.1177/147592171988233010.1177/1475921719882330 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0041-624X(97)00038-310.1016/S0041-624X(97)00038-3 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ultras.2020.10611410.1016/j.ultras.2020.106114 ↗
46. 10.1784/insi.2009.51.7.37310.1784/insi.2009.51.7.373 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2011.05.01010.1016/j.ndteint.2011.05.010 ↗
48. 10.1177/146134841988618910.1177/1461348419886189 ↗
49. 10.1109/TUFFC.2019.294045110.1109/TUFFC.2019.2940451 ↗
50. 10.3390/s1923517410.3390/s19235174 ↗
51. 10.1177/147592171988710910.1177/1475921719887109 ↗
52. 10.1117/12.258298610.1117/12.2582986 ↗