journal article·2025-03-04

Correlational fractal analysis of the Kaiser effect in rock: implications for salt-cavern engineering under triaxial cyclic loading and unloading

Jingjing Dai, Jianfeng Liu, Jianxiong Yang, Lina Ran, Fujun Xue, Xin He

Publisher page

Abstract

The Kaiser effect exhibits stress-induced changes in the acoustic properties of rock, so accurately identifying the Kaiser point of rock under complex conditions is essential for understanding the damage and failure mechanisms. In this paper, triaxial loading and unloading tests were conducted on salt rock using MTS815 material testing machine and PCI-II acoustic emission (AE) system. By introducing the Kaiser point calculation approach involving AE signal optimisation, Grassberger-Procaccia (GP) algorithm, K-means clustering, and random sample consensus (RANSAC) algorithm, we achieved enhanced accuracy in analysing the Kaiser effect for salt rock. The cumulative AE energy exhibited a distinct surge point during the cycle number (N) was less than 21, closely aligned with the optimised key AE energy point. For N > 21, the cumulative energy displayed stable changes, rendering conventional method ineffective. By utilising screened AE signals (8796 samples) within the GP algorithm, the surge point of cumulative energy consistently aligned with the sudden drop point of the correlation dimension when N<21, with a maximum error of 6 s. Remarkably, the GP algorithm identified the prominent Kaiser point even when N > 21, suggesting its applicability throughout the loading cycle.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Geoscience and Mining Technology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Sichuan University

CNPC Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Underground Storage Engineering

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Scientific and technological research projects in Sichuan province

References (81)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11440-022-01617-210.1007/s11440-022-01617-2 ↗
2. 10.3390/su1503281610.3390/su15032816 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.10.00510.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.10.005 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.16513910.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165139 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2023.10538810.1016/j.ijrmms.2023.105388 ↗
6. 10.1155/2021/665108810.1155/2021/6651088 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jngse.2021.10434110.1016/j.jngse.2021.104341 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11430-020-9646-x10.1007/s11430-020-9646-x ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.10567610.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.105676 ↗
10. 10.1007/s11440-013-0277-910.1007/s11440-013-0277-9 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11440-013-0236-510.1007/s11440-013-0236-5 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijmst.2023.11.00810.1016/j.ijmst.2023.11.008 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0148-9062(99)00017-010.1016/S0148-9062(99)00017-0 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.01.00210.1016/j.enggeo.2010.01.002 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.03.01510.1016/j.jrmge.2023.03.015 ↗
16. Yoshikawa S, Mogi K. Experimental studies on the effect of stress history on acoustic emission activity―a possibility for estimation of rock stress. J Acoust Emiss. 1989;8(4):113–123.
17. 10.12989/gae.2018.14.2.20310.12989/gae.2018.14.2.203 ↗
18. 10.1029/GL006i001p0000910.1029/GL006i001p00009 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00603-022-03123-z10.1007/s00603-022-03123-z ↗
20. 10.1073/pnas.231003912110.1073/pnas.2310039121 ↗
21. 10.1007/s11223-023-00508-510.1007/s11223-023-00508-5 ↗
22. 10.1111/j.1475-1305.2002.00022.x10.1111/j.1475-1305.2002.00022.x ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2019.03.00210.1016/j.ijrmms.2019.03.002 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.01.04610.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.01.046 ↗
25. 10.1007/s11771-022-5213-410.1007/s11771-022-5213-4 ↗
26. 10.2113/2021/765714310.2113/2021/7657143 ↗
27. 10.1007/s00603-017-1178-210.1007/s00603-017-1178-2 ↗
28. 10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00138-710.1016/S1365-1609(02)00138-7 ↗
29. 10.1130/0016-7606(1963)74[487:SNDCOR]2.0.CO;210.1130/0016-7606(1963)74[487:SNDCOR]2.0.CO;2 ↗
30. Wang X, Ge H, Song L, et al. Experimental study of two types of rock sample acoustic emission events and Kaiser effect point recognition approach. Chin J Roc Mech Eng. 2011;30(3):580–588.
31. Zhang D, Bai X, Qi X, et al. Acoustic emission characteristics and in-situ stresses of bedding rock based on Kaiser effect. Chin J Roc Mech Eng. 2016;35(1):87–97.
32. Peng G, Ming X, Xie Q, et al. Pseudo Kaiser point rectification of rock acoustic emission based on energy principle. J China Coal Soc. 2017;42(5):1165–1172.
33. Zhao K, Deng F, Jin J, et al. Wavelet analysis of Kaiser signal of rock acoustic emission and its application. Chin J Roc Mech Eng. 2006;25(2):3854–3858.
34. Wang G, Zhang Y, Zhao K. Research on identification characteristics of Kaiser signal of sandstone. Rock Soil Mech. 2010;31(6):1913–1918.
35. Chen Y, Wei Z, Zhang Q. Experimental study on Felicity effect of acoustic emission in rock under cyclic loading and tiered cyclic loading. J China Coal Soc. 2012;37(2):226–230.
36. 10.1007/s00603017000210.1007/s006030170002 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.epsl.2023.11851510.1016/j.epsl.2023.118515 ↗
38. Takens F. Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. Dynamical systems and turbulence Warwick 1980. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 1981. p. 366–381.10.1007/BFb0091924 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.71210.1103/PhysRevLett.45.712 ↗
40. Zhang Y, Liang P, Liu X, et al. Experimental study on precursor of rock burst based on acoustic emission signal dominant-frequency and entropy. Chin J Roc Mech Eng. 2015;34:2959–2967.
41. Ji H, Lu X. Characteristics of acoustic emission and rock fracture precursors of granite under conventional triaxial compression. Chin J Roc Mech Eng. 2015;34(4):694–702.
42. Li Z, Liu J, Bian Y, et al. Characteristic analysis on rock salt account emission evaluation in the triaxial loading and unloading process. Chinese J Underground Space Eng. 2017;6:1566–1572.
43. Zhang R, Xie H, Liu J, et al. Experimental study on acoustic emission characteristics of rock failure under uniaxial multilevel loadings. Chin J Roc Mech Eng. 2006;25(12):2584–2588.
44. Li Y, Liu J, Zhao X, et al. Study on b-value and fractal dimension of acoustic emission during rock failure process. Rock Soil Mech. 2009;30(9):2559–2539.
45. 10.1016/j.ijmst.2021.06.00710.1016/j.ijmst.2021.06.007 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.10735310.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107353 ↗
47. 10.1007/s00603-022-03185-z10.1007/s00603-022-03185-z ↗
48. 10.3390/en1302030510.3390/en13020305 ↗
49. 10.1007/s10462-021-09967-110.1007/s10462-021-09967-1 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2023.12.01110.1016/j.enganabound.2023.12.011 ↗
51. 10.1007/s11223-017-9831-210.1007/s11223-017-9831-2 ↗
52. Mandelbrot BB. The fractal geometry of nature. New York: WH freeman; 1982.
53. 10.1201/978100307762610.1201/9781003077626 ↗
54. Council CE. Code for rock tests of hydroelectric and water conservancy engineering. Beijing: China Electric Power Press; 2007.
55. 10.1007/s10921-012-0132-110.1007/s10921-012-0132-1 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.02.01510.1016/j.compstruc.2007.02.015 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.02.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2005.02.002 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.06.27910.1016/j.jmrt.2023.06.279 ↗
59. Yao X, Zhang Y, Liu X, et al. Optimization method for key characteristic signal of acoustic emission in rock fracture. Rock Soil Mech. 2018;39(1):375–384.
60. 10.1016/0167-2789(83)90298-110.1016/0167-2789(83)90298-1 ↗
61. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.34610.1103/PhysRevLett.50.346 ↗
62. 10.1007/s00477-010-0425-910.1007/s00477-010-0425-9 ↗
63. 10.1007/s11434-010-4180-610.1007/s11434-010-4180-6 ↗
64. Xiao C, Feng D, Feng X. Fast RANSAC algorithm with resample optimization. J Comput Aided Des Comput Grap. 2016;28(4):606–613.
65. 10.1007/s11223-021-00344-510.1007/s11223-021-00344-5 ↗
66. 10.1007/s11223-023-00489-510.1007/s11223-023-00489-5 ↗
67. 10.1007/s11223-022-00465-510.1007/s11223-022-00465-5 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.10458410.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104584 ↗
69. 10.1007/s00603-020-02152-w10.1007/s00603-020-02152-w ↗
70. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.10487310.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104873 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.10663310.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106633 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.10667310.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106673 ↗
73. Liu J, Bian Y, Zheng D, et al. Discussion on strength analysis of salt rock under triaxial compressive stress. Rock Soil Mech. 2014;35(4):919–925.
74. 10.1016/j.est.2022.10614510.1016/j.est.2022.106145 ↗
75. Zhao K, Yan D, Zhong C, et al. Comprehensive analysis method and experimental vertification for in-situ stress measurement by acoustic emission tests. Chinese J Geotech Eng. 2012;34(8):1403–1411.
76. Chen Y, Zhang Y. Influence of loading rate on the Kaiser effect for different lithological rocks. J China Coal Soc. 2018;43(4):62–69.
77. Li H, Yang C, Li B, et al. Damage evolution and characteristics of ultrasonic velocity and acoustic emission for salt rock under triaxial multilevel loading test. Chin J Roc Mech Eng. 2016;35(4):682–691.
78. Li N, Wang E, Zhao E, et al. Experiment on acoustic emission of rock damage and fracture under cyclic loading and multi-stage loading. J China Coal Soc. 2010;35(7):1099–1103.
79. 10.1007/s00603-024-03891-w10.1007/s00603-024-03891-w ↗
80. 10.1080/10589759.2024.231925710.1080/10589759.2024.2319257 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.powtec.2024.11975110.1016/j.powtec.2024.119751 ↗