Nondestructive detection of laser-cladding coating interface defects: a deep learning-enhanced laser ultrasonics approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Laser-cladding technology is now widely used in repairing mechanical parts and creating functional coatings. However, interface defects are commonly found in laser-cladding coatings, significantly impacting the fatigue and mechanical properties of these coatings. Therefore, it is necessary to detect interface defects in laser-cladding coatings. In this study, we utilised laser ultrasonics (LU) method to test interface defects non-destructively. However, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of LU signals was poor. To address this issue, an unsupervised deep learning method was used to enhance the SNR. The results showed that the noises were suppressed by the deep learning method. Based on the deep learning-enhanced LU method, surface acoustic waves were used to present B-scan and C-scan images. The artificial defects with a 0.5 mm diameter were detected. Consequently, the deep learning-enhanced LU method proves to be a viable approach for the contactless, online, and non-destructive testing of interface defects in laser-cladding coatings.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Zhengzhou University
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.10691510.1016/j.optlastec.2021.106915 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.10661910.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106619 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.03.06110.1016/j.jmapro.2021.03.061 ↗
4. 10.2351/7.000021410.2351/7.0000214 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.10.04310.1016/j.ijleo.2015.10.043 ↗
6. 10.1007/s00339-009-5266-310.1007/s00339-009-5266-3 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.16573310.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165733 ↗
8. 10.31449/inf.v42i3.245410.31449/inf.v42i3.2454 ↗
9. 10.1088/1742-6596/1881/3/03208810.1088/1742-6596/1881/3/032088 ↗
10. 10.1080/09349847.2020.179532910.1080/09349847.2020.1795329 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matchar.2015.02.00810.1016/j.matchar.2015.02.008 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.pacs.2020.10022610.1016/j.pacs.2020.100226 ↗
13. 10.3390/met1102027510.3390/met11020275 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matchar.2020.11046510.1016/j.matchar.2020.110465 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ultras.2021.10656710.1016/j.ultras.2021.106567 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ultras.2020.10627310.1016/j.ultras.2020.106273 ↗
17. 10.1080/10589759.2021.199848910.1080/10589759.2021.1998489 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.16589310.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165893 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ultras.2018.06.00510.1016/j.ultras.2018.06.005 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2007.08.00210.1016/j.ndteint.2007.08.002 ↗
21. 10.1080/10589759.2023.229708110.1080/10589759.2023.2297081 ↗
22. 10.1080/10589759.2023.225536610.1080/10589759.2023.2255366 ↗
23. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/2/02502210.1088/0964-1726/22/2/025022 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ultras.2021.10656010.1016/j.ultras.2021.106560 ↗
25. 10.1007/s00170-018-3046-y10.1007/s00170-018-3046-y ↗
26. 10.3390/app1001036510.3390/app10010365 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.11003010.1016/j.optlastec.2023.110030 ↗
28. 10.1109/SPAWDA51471.2021.944547010.1109/SPAWDA51471.2021.9445470 ↗
29. 10.1364/AO.44967310.1364/AO.449673 ↗
30. Kohler T, Lorenz D. A comparison of denoising methods for one dimensional time series. Bremen, Germany, University of Bremen. 2005;131:950.
31. 10.1109/TGRS.2019.292677210.1109/TGRS.2019.2926772 ↗
32. 10.1093/gji/ggac29010.1093/gji/ggac290 ↗
33. 10.1190/geo2019-0468.110.1190/geo2019-0468.1 ↗
34. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 2400: 2012 - Non-destructive testing. Ultrasonic testing. Specification for calibration block No. 1.
35. 10.1121/1.38981110.1121/1.389811 ↗
36. 10.1088/0022-3727/45/17/17510310.1088/0022-3727/45/17/175103 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.10756710.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107567 ↗
38. 10.1097/00006982-199515010-0000810.1097/00006982-199515010-00008 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.12.03810.1016/j.neucom.2016.12.038 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.cma.2019.11273210.1016/j.cma.2019.112732 ↗
41. Nair V, Hinton GE Rectified linear units improve restricted Boltzmann machines[C]. Proceedings of the 27th international conference on machine learning (ICML-10) Haifa; 2010: 807–814.
42. Kingma DP, Ba J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv Preprint arXiv. 2014;1412:6980.
43. Alguri KS, Harley JB, AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP Publishing LLC Vermont; 2019, 050013.
44. 10.1109/TUFFC.2021.308794910.1109/TUFFC.2021.3087949 ↗
45. Abbate A, Nguyen N, LaBreck S, et al. Ultrasonic signal processing algorithms for the characterization of thin multilayers. J Nondestr Test. 2002;7(10):8.
46. 10.1109/TIM.2013.226747110.1109/TIM.2013.2267471 ↗
47. 10.1063/1.366387210.1063/1.3663872 ↗
48. 10.1121/1.496427510.1121/1.4964275 ↗