Vibroacoustic modulation method with arbitrary probe wave frequency based on machine learning algorithms
Source abstract
Abstract
The vibro-acoustic modulation (VAM) method assesses the integrity of a structure using modulation of a high-frequency probe wave and a low-frequency pump wave and measuring the modulation index. A large body of studies found that the modulation index could be used for the defection of contact-type defects in different materials. However, it was also found that the performance of this method is dependent on the probe wave frequency selection. To enhance the robustness of this method, researchers made efforts to modify the VAM method raising the complexity of the equipment and related operator skills, creating needs for extra preparation or procedures. All of these limits VAM potential for industrial application. To develop a robust, efficient, and fast VAM-based non-destructive testing method, the machine learning algorithm was employed. The algorithm utilises amplitude of the multiple sidebands of the modulation spectrum as feature variables and the structural integrity as target variables for training and testing the machine learning model. The experimental result shows that the fatigue crack could be detected with an arbitrary probe wave frequency using the applied machine learning approach.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil, Environmental & Ocean Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Kundu T, editor. Nonlinear ultrasonic and vibro-acoustical techniques for nondestructive evaluation. New York City: Springer; 2018.
2. 10.1177/1045389X980090090910.1177/1045389X9800900909 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0963-8695(00)00063-310.1016/S0963-8695(00)00063-3 ↗
4. 10.1121/1.478420810.1121/1.4784208 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.295626910.1063/1.2956269 ↗
6. 10.1007/978-1-4615-4847-8_8710.1007/978-1-4615-4847-8_87 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.07.00110.1016/j.jsv.2016.07.001 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11071-015-1976-610.1007/s11071-015-1976-6 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11423310.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114233 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.171178110.1063/1.1711781 ↗
11. 10.1177/147592171036526110.1177/1475921710365261 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.12.00110.1016/j.ymssp.2013.12.001 ↗
13. 10.1177/147592171770463810.1177/1475921717704638 ↗
14. Liu B, Gang T, Wan C, et al. Analysis of nonlinear modulation between sound and vibrations in metallic structure and its use for damage detection. Case Stud NondestrTest Eval. 2015;30(3):277–290.
15. 10.1016/j.jsv.2020.11580810.1016/j.jsv.2020.115808 ↗
16. 10.1177/147592172098288510.1177/1475921720982885 ↗
17. 10.1121/2.000083110.1121/2.0000831 ↗
18. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/6/06501710.1088/0964-1726/19/6/065017 ↗
19. Hassiotis S, Donskoy D. Detection of damage precursors in steel components for life-cycle assessments (No FHWA-NJ-2019-010). New Jersey: Dept. of Transportation; 2019.
20. 10.3390/acoustics401000510.3390/acoustics4010005 ↗