Research on the contact fatigue failure of thermal sprayed coating based on infrared thermography
Source abstract
Abstract
Aiming to improve the accuracy of the contact life prediction of sprayed coatings, a series of contact fatigue tests are conducted on RM-1 tester. Five kinds of plasma sprayed Al2O3–40 wt%TiO2 composite ceramic coatings (AT40 ceramic coatings) of different quality and surface performance parameters are tested on the principle of central composite design. The passive infrared thermography is used to monitor the temperature change of the coating during the process of contact fatigue failure. The findings reveal that the infrared signal which is characteristic of non-stationary stochastic process shows a pre-warning against the failure of coatings. Both singularity detection and k-means clustering analysis come to a conclusion that the invalidating process of coating caused by contact fatigue is an interwoven result of crack initiation, crack propagation and crack instability fracture, etc. The nonstationarity of the infrared signal is further verified by non-parametric hypothesis test. Based on the results of correlation analysis between the contact point temperature range of the coating surface and the contact fatigue life, a reliable nonlinear prediction model is established.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Brake Systems and Friction Analysis · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Basic Education Department, Army Academy of Armored Forces, Beijing, China
National Key Laboratory for Remanufacturing, Army Academy of Armored Forces, Beijing, China
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Wang HD · Trans China Weld Inst · 2011 · 32 · 1
2. Linkert Gregory · Aircraft Maint Technol · 2014 · 25 · 20
3. Pang LH · J South China Univ Technol · 2014 · 42 · 55
4. 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.11.03210.1016/j.asoc.2015.11.032 ↗
5. 10.1007/s12206-016-0618-310.1007/s12206-016-0618-3 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.triboint.2013.12.01910.1016/j.triboint.2013.12.019 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.triboint.2014.01.01410.1016/j.triboint.2014.01.014 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.09.03510.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.09.035 ↗
9. Piao ZY · Tribol Int · 2010 · 44 · 1304
10. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.02610.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.026 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.triboint.2013.12.01610.1016/j.triboint.2013.12.016 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.triboint.2012.12.01010.1016/j.triboint.2012.12.010 ↗
13. Fan BN · J Vibr Shock · 2015 · 34 · 147
14. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.07.09010.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.07.090 ↗
15. Wang ZY · J Aeronaut Mater · 2012 · 32 · 91
16. Ge L · Aerosp Mater Technol · 2014 · 4 · 81
17. 10.1016/j.infrared.2016.05.02710.1016/j.infrared.2016.05.027 ↗
18. Guo W · J Acad Armored Force Eng · 2016 · 30 · 89
19. 10.1017/CBO978113917173110.1017/CBO9781139171731 ↗
20. Wang BK · China Mech Eng · 2002 · 13 · 1880
21. Ma RB · ACTA Armamentarii · 2017 · 3 · 561
22. DeGroot MH · 2012
23. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.12.00510.1016/j.ymssp.2005.12.005 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.patrec.2004.04.00710.1016/j.patrec.2004.04.007 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.01110.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.011 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.spl.2009.09.01610.1016/j.spl.2009.09.016 ↗
27. Freund RJ · 2012
28. 10.1002/047005546410.1002/0470055464 ↗
29. Fang KT · 2001
30. 10.1016/j.triboint.2016.04.00410.1016/j.triboint.2016.04.004 ↗
31. 10.1109/24.40658810.1109/24.406588 ↗
32. Mao SS · 2008
33. Wang X · 2009