journal article·2022-09-03

High-resolution X-ray computed tomography simulations of synthetically-generated volume porosity in continuous carbon fibre-reinforced polymer samples

Bernhard Plank, Markus G. R. Sause, Johann Kastner

Publisher page

Abstract

The fast and correct determination of porosity in carbon fibre–reinforced polymers and other polymeric material is an important application area of X-ray computed tomography (CT). In this CT simulation study, microstructures such as individual carbon fibres, micro-voids, as well as the polymer matrix including mesoscale voids, were taken into account to generate CT data synthetically with well-known porosity. It was found that the ratio of total surface area (SA) of the voids divided by the total volume (V) of the voids is suitable to describe and differentiate individual porosity samples. Our investigations revealed that the ratio SA/V can be used to estimate a minimal necessary voxel size for proper porosity segmentation by a simple ISO50 threshold. Under certain conditions, using an adapted ISOxx threshold value at a resolution of (10 µm)3 voxel size, the porosity in a specimen can be determined with an average measurement error below 10%. As long as the CT resolution is not high enough to completely resolve all void structures, using global threshold segmentation is always a compromise between over-segmentation of the macro-voids and under-segmentation of micro-voids.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications · Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Research Group Computed Tomography, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Wels, Austria

Institute of Materials Resource Management, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany

Funding

österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Bossi RH. · Am Inst Phys Conf Proc · 2005 · 820 · 965
2. Helmus R. Out-of-Autoclave Prepregs: Stochastic Modelling of Void Formation [PhD at Technische Universität München]. 2016: pp. 159.
3. 10.1002/pc.2653810.1002/pc.26538 ↗
4. 10.1177/089270571666251410.1177/0892705716662514 ↗
5. Stamopoulos A · J Compos Mater · 2015 · 50 · 12
6. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2011.05.01210.1016/j.ndteint.2011.05.012 ↗
7. Yolken HT, Matzkanin GA, Bartel JE. Nondestructive evaluation (NDE) of advanced fiber reinforced polymer composites. Austin (TX): Nondestructive Testing Information Analysis Center; 2002. (Report no. NTIAC-TA-01-01, Contract no. SPO700-97-D-4003, Sponsored by the Department of Defense).
8. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00157-910.1016/S0266-3538(01)00157-9 ↗
9. 10.1784/insi.46.11.681.5228010.1784/insi.46.11.681.52280 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10167110.1016/j.addma.2020.101671 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10582510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105825 ↗
12. Kiefel D. Quantitative Porositätscharakterisierung von CFK-Werkstoffen mit der Mikro-Computertomografie [dissertation]. Munich (Germany): Technische Universität München; 2017: 207.
13. Plank B · 2015 · 10
14. Kastner J · 2010 · 12
15. Reiter M · 2019 · 9
16. Kiefel D · 2014 · 35
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.04.02910.1016/j.compositesa.2019.04.029 ↗
18. Reiter M · 2016 · 7
19. Gusenbauer C · 2018 · 8
20. 10.1016/j.matchar.2011.12.00410.1016/j.matchar.2011.12.004 ↗
21. ISO 15708-3. Nondestructive testing - radiation methods - computed tomography - part 3: operation and interpretation. 2017.
22. 10.1086/62429810.1086/624298 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.04.01210.1016/j.ndteint.2013.04.012 ↗
24. Plank B · 2019 · 11
25. Stelzer PS · Case Stud NondestrTest Eval · 2020 · 35 · 342
26. Savandaiah C · 2021 · 9
27. 10.1080/10589759.2020.177458210.1080/10589759.2020.1774582 ↗
28. 10.1002/pc.2668710.1002/pc.26687 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.017 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.004 ↗