Detection of defects in a welded joint by scanning contact potentiometry
Source abstract
Abstract
Scanning contact potentiometry (SCP) is a nondestructive method used for defects detection, and for determining the location coordinates of defects in welded joints. This paper evaluates the accuracy of SCP method in detecting defects and localising them in welded steel plates. The effectiveness of the SCP method was evaluated using sample of steel 321 H plates (Chromium–Nickel–titanium stainless steel), where sample plates were welded by means of manual arc welding, dimension of each 200 × 110 × 13.5 mm. After welding, welded sample was inspected using an X-ray radiographic testing system. In order to investigate SCP capabilities, plotted potentiograms were compared with the corresponding X-ray radiograph image. Furthermore, SCP signals were analysed using discrete Fourier transform. Experimental outcomes proved that defects can be detected by SCP technique more accurate comparative to X-ray. Also it is considered an inexpensive comparable to X-ray and ultrasound non-destructive testing methods. As a result, SCP may substitute some destructive or non-destructive testing methods.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrical Contact Performance and Analysis · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Moscow, Russia
Gamma irradiation facility, Jordan Atomic Energy commission, Amman, Jordan
Tekhnoskan Company, Volgodonsk, Russia
Volgodonsk Engineering Technical Institute-MEPhI, Volgodonsk, Russia
Funding
Russian Foundation for Basic Research
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Levitin VV · Vacuum · 2001 · 66 · 36710.1016/S0042-207X(01)00215-9 ↗
2. Rahemi R · Scriptamaterialia · 2015 · 99 · 41
3. Kittel C · 2005
4. Kelvin L · London, Edinburgh, Dublin Philos Mag J Sci · 1898 · 46 · 8210.1080/14786449808621172 ↗
5. Nazarov A · Electrochimicaacta · 2007 · 52 · 768910.1016/j.electacta.2007.05.077 ↗
6. Muster TH · J Electrochem Soc · 2006 · 153 · B47410.1149/1.2349356 ↗
7. Eitzen DG · J Res National Bur Stand · 1984 · 89 · 7510.6028/jres.089.008 ↗
8. Wadley HNG · Int Met Rev · 1980 · 2 · 41
9. Ryabikovskaya E · Energy Procedia · 2017 · 127 · 310.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.085 ↗
10. Surin VI · Nucl Eng Int · 2018 · 63 · 30
11. Arefinkina SE · Modern Prob Theory Machines – North Charleston · 2016 · 4 · 177
12. Surin VI · Russ J Nondestr Test · 2019 · 55 · 5910.1134/S106183091901011X ↗
13. Ferrante J · Phys Rev B · 1985 · 31 · 342710.1103/PhysRevB.31.3427 ↗
14. Greenwood JA · Proc Royal Soc London Ser A Math Phys Sci · 1966 · 295 · 300
15. Greenwood JA · Br J Appl Phys · 1966 · 17 · 162110.1088/0508-3443/17/12/310 ↗
16. Mallat SA · 1999
17. Ryabikovskaya E · 2015